all theseking at options as we speak, he will have a bit more to say. tweet -- areas -- any number of just the construction alone was estimated to be 20,000 jobs on the keystone xl pipeline. work, a lot of trenching that would have to be done. is an immediate benefit on the direct side. all the folks who are providing the best aerials -- providing the materials, all are going to be very much impacted as well. number ofan enormous jobs. this issue has caught up in politics. has become ideological. the state report says if we build this pipeline that it will not have an impact on carbon emissions because this soil is going to go somewhere. i would arsenal that i would also argue that transporting this oil by truck and rail is not a very energy efficient way to move all this. host: is the xl pipeline done for the year? i would prefer harry reid simply allow for a vote on the keystone xl pipeline. i don't know why this is so complicated. i know there are many in the senate's who would like to see this move forward. just allow a straight up or down vote. why

all theseking at options as we speak, he will have a bit more to say. tweet --

all theseking at options as we speak, he will have a bit more to say.et -- areas -- any number of just the construction alone was estimated to be 20,000 jobs on the keystone xl pipeline. work, a lot of trenching that would have to be done. is an immediate benefit on the direct side. all the folks who are providing the best aerials -- providing the materials, all are going to be very much impacted as well. number ofan enormous jobs. this issue has caught up in politics. has become ideological. the state report says if we build this pipeline that it will not have an impact on carbon emissions because this soil is going to go somewhere. i would arsenal that i would also argue that transporting this oil by truck and rail is not a very energy efficient way to move all this. host: is the xl pipeline done for the year? i would prefer harry reid simply allow for a vote on the keystone xl pipeline. i don't know why this is so complicated. i know there are many in the senate's who would like to see this move forward. just allow a straight up or down vote. why doe