thwe have to compare this, as we have been hearing in the discussion this morning on the floor of the house and senate, to the alternatives. reality that iran haseen a nuclear capable country since 2006-2007, and what could happen in the absence of this agreement, and is there a better agreement. our view is that there is not a better agreement available, given the diplomatic situation. without this deal being implement it, we would be in a very difficult situation because iran could rapidly increase its enrichment program, and put them in a position to produce enough material, in just a few weeks. host: take us to the backside of 2025-2030. is a nuclear iran assured at that point? guest: first of all, the basics are that iran or any other country can theoretically produce nuclear weapons with orhly enriched uranium plutonium. this agreement cuts and half its enrichment capacity and reduces the stockpile to very small ofunt so that for a period 10-15 years, it would take iran 12 months to put together enough material for just one nuclear weapon. they would have to do other things after two weaponize it. blockedonium path is because the reactor