i thk u would choose thee ckn: .-- justice gorsuci gus i'm struggling to understand what -- what -'s at stake here given the questions because, as i understand justice kagan's hypotheticals, which are -- are rdnes, that one option would be to say it's ambiguouan erefore, the agency always wins. that -- that's what i underoo chevron to mean at least coming in here today. an provide special weight under skidmore to a coeql anch of goventou tnk we would do anyway, and that they would have -- have -- be considered great weight in arvi at the best answer and that that's what a court would do if -- if there were no teretive principles advaedy the exutbe some sort of rule or addication. is that -- is that correct? tnkhat's correct. and i think the difference between the skidmore approach at you just laid out and the chevron approach is just, at the end of the day, once you've considered all the expertise and all the information the agency has to bear -- justice gorsuch: who decides? martinez: who decides? who -- is the judg

general prelogar: thk it conceivably could. now i wanto ld open and acknowledge that the court has said there are certain types of statuty estions that don't fit within the chevron framework because there are kind of stutspecific reasons to think congress wasn't giving is question to the agency. i think the major questions doctrine is a species of that. i'd int to the adams fruit case as well where it was a judicial rieprovision and the court said this wasn't sothing for the agency to do. but i thin ithe mine run case, yes, and -- and to the extent you're sayin wl, it feels odd for it to depend on comma or to turn on the meaning of the word "a," still i think the inference holds becaus ithat context, congress, if it, in fact, has left the ambiguity or the gap, recognizes that the agency is going to have to come up with an aner. justice barrett: except a lot of times congress doesn't intentionally leave the ambiguity or the gap, right? it's stimits of language, limits of foresight. general prelogar: yes. so i tnk court ultimatel

we do not thk there should be a system of as applied challenges. i think what we know that congress is entitled make categorical judgments of dangerousness based on history and tradition even if there are really edge sewhere that predictive judgment was t nessary to guard against the danger. of whatyoare suggesting is there might be estate t there that is ordering judges to enter this prohibition without any basis to think that physical force is likely, i think that person would a strong due process lenge. the law would likely be invalidated on the separate basis that it does not provide due process and is requir courts to enter relief that fax not support. >> there seems tobe a fair bit of disi and confusion about what bruin means and reques similar records. i am wondering ifyou think there is any useful guidance in additi to resolving this case. any useful guidance we can give to lower courtsabt the methodology that bruin requires be used and how that applieto cases even outside of this one? >> yes. i think there are three fundamental errors in m

thk you. thank you. this concludes our fireside chat.please remain in your seats for panel two or proceed to the air force one pavilion for panel three during our break. don't forget to the hospitality tent and media center. i've got a few ideas, but it's good it's

commissioner: thk you to our witnesses. i will begin the questions by regnizing commissner patty cisneros prevo. commissionerms. french, thank you for your testimony. congress gave safesport risdiction over abuse cases in 2017, the year before you couragusly came forward as a survivor. in your testimony, you said that safesport did not protect you. you also described trauma-informed practices recognizing both the impact of trauma, and preventing re- traumatization. the believe safesport employees trauma-informed practices, and if not, how can safesport or implement such practices? witness: the short answer is no, i do not believe they employ trauma-informed practices because of the experiences i have heard from survivors who are currently going throh the procs. i myself did not rort to safe sport. i think there is opportunity f them to continue to support athletes who come forward no matter what. that said, survivors have talked about feeling like safesport was not able to communicate when theyere moving their case forward.

i thk the apa reinforces that. the socitor general ies to rescue or reconceptualize chevron by taking su with our argument that under chevron if the court thinks the best interpretation is asked and sometimes it's going to have apply y because th agency told . that is exactly what chevron says. it tellthcourt that it has applied interpretation that the court resolve -- itself would not choose. interpretation that the court itself does nothk is best. the solicitor general also described chevron aspping in the formulation that hurt a lot, applying at the en didn't resolve the question, an innocuous raising. what is reallymet by that is chevron applies in cases of ambiguity. ambiguity has always been understood asa situation where reasonable people can disagree out the law means. i just broadens the scope of deference. ambiguities are all over th place. course resolve them all the time, that is core to the interpretive function. therisno reason to think just because congress is accidentallyle an ambiguity in the statu

ant thk that a lot of christians kind of close attention to that text in that way. so it's something that i think we kind of do uniquely. it's i shouldn't even say uniquely. it's not like this is a new theology it's not like this is something that we invented this this goes back eons and christian history. it's just we've forgotten about it. so in a sense, is any earthly ruler illegitimate on some level? yes. we believe that basically whenever somebody tries to institutionalize force and claim upon the claim upon a territory, a monopoly of force, that that is illegitimate, that the only way that we are that we are permitted scripturally to interact with each other is not on the basis of the use of force, but on the basis of persuasion and peaceful interaction. so those who don't do that, that's illegitimate. so the non-aggression pact, the nape that you talk about. yeah. yeah. so. exactly. so we kind of analogize this that it's kind of the other half of the coin of the golden rule where jesus says, you know, do unto others as you wou hthem do. the other half of that

so it is exciting to me to thk of how far we've come in a latively short period. but how it opens the horizons to a lot more thinking and a lot more imagination. that is the only thing that is going to keep us as a leading nation. >> has there been someone in your life who has influenced you to keep achieving, to keep becoming the first? did you have a mentor or a parent who shaped you this way? >> i guess it started with my parents. i'm om a mixed background family. i have seen what it is like to be in that situation. my great-grandmother was scotch irish and married first to a white man and then two black men. wome and gir to be educated as best as they can be prepared. on that side of my family, it was very clear that i was not going to be able to rest on my laurels, that i would be moved to move ahead. and i know that it helped. it did not keep me from knowing who i was in the dierences which i had to face, but it also let me know that they were things you had to make possible by doing. i attribute a lot of that to a fairly assertive great-grandmother who push

thk, get deference gets you to footnote 11 land in a junior varsity way. i think that would be unfortunate. >> idre means if we think you are right we will tell you u are right. the idea that skidreis going to be a backuponce you get rid of chevron , that skidmore means anything other than nothing. re has always been nothing. >> justice jackson, the earlier one would beg to diff wh you on that score. he thoug was quite important. i think if you look at the idmore case itself, it took into account the view of waiting time. ironically enough in that ca said you can't have a bright line test one way or the the en has looked at this and it's going to be more fact depeen we can take that into account. in some of the situat you are going to be able to look at the agency's expertise and make a judgment that this is in their favor and they have made some really good points. in other contacts with the the agency wants you to defer to his own viewwhich in this case is we ran out of money. it sure would be nice if we can impose a fine and continue to monitor these pe

we don't just stop it -- >> i don't thk it is being met. >> the joint action between the private party and the state, where you are lookat, this is facilitatingstate service , you think it would not apply? >> just think a wealthy person in the city said, i want to make i more easy for people to call and get access to g government and sets up a page. that is not joinaction that is independent. >> thank u. >> thank you, counsel. >> mr. jersey. >> weagree with the petitioner that du d authority is the right way to figu out what capacity a public defendant is a acng. we think they should focus on a subset of cases regarding a denial of accesstoproperty. in those cases if the defean is exercising and offici duty to provide access li sting an official school board meeting, of course the state action, it does nomatter where it happens. for othekis of duties and where it's ambiouis the kind of thing where a private citizen can do but also with a broad descriptioofthe official responsibilitie, think the nature of the prer should beall dispositive. if the defendant denies access to government pr

i do want be clear that we certainly thk at would not lie under the numbers on civil allegory if you are focusing on law-abiding in particular, for his and tradition there's a at the conclusion that you can si those who have committed serious crimes are not just any kind of conduct at is an offense with all five. are you making a misdemeanor/felony diinction >> that is the line history an adion reflect area and i think that is the lent category with respect to law- abing citizen's. we are t direct invoking the law-abiding aspect of the danceable because mr. rahimi did not have the kind of tein record that would stify disarmament on the basis our armes are instead direct did at those not responsible foitpayment responsibility is a very broad theft. not taking your recycling to the urban first days. is a serious problem, it's irresponsible. by setting about it sample, you know, by yelling at a st ball game in particular way rad teams that problem with's ability is that it is extremely broad with interest on civil or irresponsible to so might seem like not a big deal to others or so wha

we think yourere is a direct and under the respsie listens danceable to danger and thk the disarmament provision i am defending here clearly satisfies that link becausofours individualized findings of dangerousness and a legislative consensus that individus resent the level of danger. >> think there would be ttle dispute of someone who is guilty or have a restraining order. someone poses a risk of domestic violence is dangerous. how does the government know about showing whether certain behavior qualifies as dangerous? you can imagine more marginal cases. you've invoked the consensus among that states. i don't inyou'll get a lot shback because this is violence. what about more marginalcas? >> effect as we think courts could apply in this context, and i should emphasize this is obje aningful judicial review, with hollow into a couple of different categories. at the outset, would take the class is that require didualized findings of danger and say those fall in the heartland as you suggested you have a judicial order here at specifically found that mr. rahimi's conduct was dangerous to h

private tizen could do but also within a broad descriptio the officials responsibilities, there we thk e nature of the property should be all that is dispositive. if the government denies access of property, and if it is her own personal property, she is probably acting in r own capacity as a private prerty owner, not as an agent of th state. and that framework insofaas it provides a default rule for cases we think is more tent with the purposes of the state action do, would resolve these cases today and otrslike them and would avoid the need for this court to set forth a one-size-fits- all, broader duty and auy test of broader applicability. >> what exactly is the - property? the contract talks about terms of services i gus,i'm not a facebook person but i assume they would not consider this service property. at exactly is the property ? >> i think it is form of virtual property but it isthe account, you can post speech, have conversations, you can open it up to yone or just a friend, it is a form of virtual property, it is like a virtual, i hate to use the worm -- word forum, but it i

i thk we've heard that before. i would finish the wall, but i would tell you honestly, we are going to pay for it. mexico is not. that's the job of the president. >> thank you for cominhere. >> my pleasure. >> i'm really nervous about the economy and when we look at the fuel situation and all the different costs, everything related to the economy. what i have in my hands are two bills that lks similarly but they a different. i'm not goi to do a magic trick. i'm going to read the inscription on one of them. one dollar in silver, payable t the bearer on demand. this is a silver certifite. one dollar in lver today is abt four and a hf cents. the dollar is at risk. we havcentral bank digital currency looming. and then we have brazil, russia, india, china, saudi arabia - i'm sorry, south afra. forgive me. and a bunch of otr countries undermining the u.s. dollar as thinternional currency. the only brand that i want involved in the u.s. dollar being promoted or changed is the one that is i hope the soon to be senior senat

around the regions of we are not underwriting that and not putting our troops in harm'say -- if you thk the iranians have this great military capability which i think has been overstated. there has been reports of drones and cruise missiles d the iranians are part of that. i think their military power over all is not that impressive but they have a decent missile capability. ifou think th's the case, you shldn't stick u.s. force into syria and iraq in range o at least their proxies who have various missiles and rockets and mortars they can firu.s. troops. in service of missions that are largely accomplished in terms of the antisis thing. even if you are eager to have some sort of conflict with iran which i'm not, you might want to think about whether we are doing it in the right are with you contingents of u. forces that are relatively vulnerable tre. these different attacks on u.s. forces have not killed anyone because of the weapons possessed by the forces firing at the u.s. atur troops. they are limited in accacy and explosive punch. that's temporary good news that might not last. gu

thk you for sharing your expertise and experience with us today. next, i will introduce our second witness, who is accompanied by his mher. ryan wor with several organizations, including quality trust and public action to advocate for guardianship reform . he w in a guardianship for 13 years before becominthe first person in washington, d.c., to have their guardianship terminated in favor of supported decision-making. thank you for being with us today and sharing your story and expertise with the committee. i will turn to the ranking member to introduce our third witness. >> i will introduce nick parker, the staff attorney for indiana's adult guardianship office. nick oversees indiana's volunteer for seniors program, the guardianship registry, and the adult guardianship symposium. he engages with partition nurse, experts, and stakeholders to approve indiana's ardianship system and spearheads efforts across the hoosier state to promote alternatives like supported decision-making. nick is a graduate of iu's lower school of law and previously worked f

i thk we are startg off from a stronglace. we came on the ship at they called the mayflower.e come in and we sing an americ tune. host: from steve in california. hello. caller: i am pretty optimistic. inly have 12 more months and then ts guy is out of there. but personallyi would like to see -- the only one in the senate that knows the issues. i have seen him a few times talking about global warming. and a w other things. a pleasant change to see something change, bui do not think that will happen i'm still optimistic for the reasons said before. host: the editorial takes a look at four things to be optistic about. one of the categories is the candidates for botharties. they are entitled to ask. president joe biden and donald trump are egregiously flad candidates and should not be allowed near power. indisputably helping his son take money from foreign adversaries. if that is not corruption, wha is? many oer points to be made. if youant toheck it out, you can filter those things inith your view of being optimistic or pessimistic. allen in florida, heo. caller: thank youor hav

these prized french bulldogs snatched from owners and sold on thk market in 2021, lady gaga's two frenchies were taken after her dog walker was shot. and last november, thieves stole a dozen puppies worth $100,000 from an l.a. pet store french bulldogs the number one dog breed in america cost between $3,000 to $9,000 some even more were you aware that people often target these dogs when you got it >> yes, but i never thought it >> reporter: onyx now a statistic, with zacharias still praying he'll be returned. liz kreutz, nbc news, los angeles. >> one tough lady. hope she gets him back >>> still to come, d.c. names a new woman of tomorrow. and britney spears' life may have been so protected that she'oged that she's apologizing. [clanking] [gasping] nooo... only bounty absorbs spills like a sponge. and bounty is 2x more absorbent so you can use less and get the job done with one. you've got a bit of your face on your face. bounty, the quicker picker upper. and get four rolls in one with the bounty mega roll. our longest lastng roll. oh... stuffed up again? so congested! you need sinex saline

so his 50-hour journey comes just in the nick of time before a cold front will move into the area thksan end overnight. a live report as the investigation unfolds after a neighborhood is put on edge.

i want to thk our team for working together with this because office to put this togeer. i want to thank the members that ve allraveled to get here. two days after the holidays. we could all be doing different things. but, we are united in making sure house republicans' top priority is securing the border. it shows bias ing here. by the way, two eks agohere were 12,000 peop coming over illegally. under that bridge right down the street. there werehousands of people in the firefly facilitwe visited earlier today that has a max capacity of 1000 people. there were 6000 people. there were 4000 people getting released. we were at the brink of massive catch and release. that happens, our communities get turned upside wn. it may start here in eagle pass. then, it quick reaches san antonio. then, it quickly reaches out of the country. guess what? today that stops. it may have to do with the fact of the speaker and 60 plus members showing up. but, it stopped. the biggest part is 1400 border patrol agent, today, are not processing migrants that have come into our country illegally.

thk it is a logical follow-on of chevron, and here is why.the court has found at step one that congress spoke to the issue, there's no room under anx for the agency to reverse the court or somehow change the uering meaning of the statute. instead, the statuteaseen interpreted at step one and what congress says goes. it's only in the category of step two cases where brand x comes into play, and in that circumstance, it's because the court in the prior case has understood the statute to leave a gap or an ambiguity for the agcy to fill, considering a so, in that circumstance too, the meaning of the statute don't change. it remains a gap for the agency to fill at time o,nd if the agency is running through all of the procedural hoo, ich can be quite burdensome in this context, to change its regulatory approach, it is still acting consistently with the -- justice gorsuch: or not. general prelogar: -- wh e discretion. justice gorsuch: or not if i-- if it issues an interpretive rule without notice and comment or issues an adjudication. itayr may not

also will guarantee recognition of israel from all the arab states and their[3 security, but here i thk there is a lot of obstacles also down the road. >> well, let's be clear. we have a part of the world. we have with a few million of israelis and the american of palestinians. they cannot liquidate each other. they need to be able to live together in their territory. and i think that the progressive relaxation of the interest of the international community led to a situation in which hope started to be lost. what has happened was horrible. horrible first of all, the barbaric attacks of hamas. horrible what's happening out in gaza. but this shows that something drastic needs to be done to make sure that these two communities can live together and it only refer these two committees to live together in peace and street is that each one of them has a state. so i believe that the present situation has demonstrated that the two-state solution is an absolutely essential way to solve this problem and an absolutely essential way to preserve a minimum of peace and stability in the region. alread

christian: it is not a very good line, so we will leave it there, but thk you very much for your thoughtme in the studio is international editor jeremy bowen. a lot of angry rhetoric today, but i would imagine that is usually in this case, they will take it back and considerate. will it change the way that israel executes the war? jeremy: that is what the court hopes. the court has said very clearly that israel -- it did not ask for a cease-fire, which isn't surprising, because estate have a right to self-defense. israel was attacked on the seventh of october, they are fighting back. the issue is how they fight. the court wants them to fight in a very different way, and it as it said come back to us in a month from now and show us what you are doing. will israel change the way it is fighting? well, we will have to see. the americans have been onto them for what seems like months to try to fight in a more targeted way. don't just drop a big bombs on the area you want to hit. be more surgical, is what the americans -- the way they put it in the hope of reducing the number of civilians who

thank■j [applause] >> thk you very welcome mr. president. but that was before theore.ies of the seventh of october. the terror attack thatit. so it may be, let's start with mr. president with you sharing who is the feelings now among israel? >> our world was shattered on the seventh of october. i can say that we were celebratg a jew holiday the feast of the bible and we were awakened into a h■u■;ug we did not comprehend fully what we we havenot comprehend asatio it was 6:30 a.m. in the morning. sirens all of a sudden blew up in the silence of the morning of h vacation. little did we imagine we would see such terrible horrors that we would see something generations. we'llte see something that made israel and the numbers of jews being killed since the holocaust. these are the facts beating atr, rape,, chopping of heads, burnings of families. on one of the houses burned wired around a whole block of ashes of five people on most of all the hostages. this is clear today with year ts birth exactly a year ago he was born to his parents to his mother and his brother. and his w

use the world -- word ministerial. >> picking thjury based on [ indiscernible ] whatever johnson did thk it was the very same statutbrght against the united states that isbere us today. >> the distinction in those cases is between the judicial case johnson,sorry, legislative, i'm sorry legislative case johnson between legislacts and non-legislative acts. the distinction in expe virginia is between judicial acts and nonjudicial acts in here the distinction is between presidential acts and nonpresidential acts. and everything mentioned in the indictment is a presidential act. >> may i? there are a number of cases in which the supreme urhas reviewed actions by the president. the supreme court reviewed harry truman's seizure of the steel mills during e korean war. there is also the case of where little versus bream were chief justice marshall review the tion of president adams when he sees certain vessel trump versus hawaii was reviewing presidt ump's order restricting entrceinto united states from nationals fr rtain foreign countries. how does that square with yo position that judiciary can

craig:i thk it matters ia very human and personal sense. matter as much as what kennedy dias president? probably not. but you want to know methinabout kennedy, the human being, it is a wonderful chance to see what his values were, what he was willing to do, and how he treed other people. d sorenson is the pers who did mo of thwork on the book. and one thing that kennedy did write was the practice and the acknowledgements. inhe preface and the acknowledgments, kendy wrote it and didn't en mention sorenson's name. sorenson said maybe you should meion me so kennedy added that mention ck in. and then when the scandal came about, sorenson d kenny both would refer to the acknledgments and say, everything is above board with this boo we mentioned that ted did a litt bit of work, but that th is is kennedy's book. but that credit only existed because sorens had tremind kennedy maybe yoshould give the person who actually wrote the book the credit. that's not a cub missile crisis in terms of historical import, but it ia human being who decided that th

here is another thing to thk about in terms of kaiser.ead the court's decision in addition to the fact that we kn it doesn't directly speak to chevron, i also read it as all this at the unit a special justification. i think we've offered special justificio in droves. special justification yo thdecision. i do not know of a case where you would der when the relevant decision did not cite the lent statue at all. if chevron went in and russell with 706 is that despital textural indication it forecloses review of stut i suppose i would have to be here making every single starry decisis argument. that is not what chevron did. it did not mention the relevant patch you. i do not want to be seen as ruing away from the starry decisis factors. i am happy to lkthrough al of them. i think all of them cut in our vo the decision is tremendously unworkable. nodyknows what ambiguity is. even my learned frndon the other side says there is no formula. that is an elaboration of what the government said the last time, which is nobody kns what ambiguity means.

i thk that is what our presidents should do in their books.hat is what i have tried to do in my book, is show the personal side and if more presidents look to coolidge as a literary model, i think we would be better off as readers. host: the ok is called "autho in chief," craig fehrn's first book. thank you for spending an hour with c-span. guest: it has been a pleasure. ♪ [captions copyright nation cable satellite corp. 2023] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy, visit ncicap.org] >> all q&a programs are avlable on our website or as a podcast at c-span.org. ♪

wei want to say first of all thk you. did not expect steve to do this it couple days ago but he and i have been talking about this issue and what it means for our constitution. from steve kg to many people not named steve here today who have had the passion for what is right in this country and our that's why i am in this race. to stand up for truth. to stand up for our constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. the question comes up why is a presidential candidate talking about an issue that is specific to the state of i. the answer is this. the next u.s. president absolutely has the power to put an end to the use of private domain for this pipeline and that's what i'm here to tell you about what i will do for you as your next president. thank you for the warm welcome. the heart of this issueé/ starts with a climate change agenda that absolutely is a hoax because it is h■ostile to the sovereignty of the united states of america. that's what's on the table today, the sovereignty of our nation. our sovereignty as citizens of th

by then i had wife and two babies and h he said i do, i thk at that something you this when you change america maybe even change the world i don't know it. that r study. i need to be relieved of all household duties, no diapers, no trash, , no yardwork, she bought into it. for 70 years and made a deep dive into direct marketing trick mail and if this is microvote of the country back in the states conservative message with end up against a blockage "new york times" abc nbc et cetera. we could get a message out. eve. i can make a case that ronald reagan would not have gotten the nomination in 1980 without direct mail, because when john connally and george h.w. bush were getting the thousand contributions, he was getting hundreds of thousands of ten, 15, $25 contributions funded campaign made all the difference. mr. viguerie what makes an effective direct mail letter? talk about one that you've written. well direct mail is used to be, until recently, the second largest form of advertising in the country. television number one now is number three, because the internet, internet's number on

just a couple other people we want to thk.ug brinkley, the historian, did a kicff event at the library of congress in september. we have had a core staff. paul has been the executive producer. jen garrett shoa lot of the video that you see and has been a oducer on the 10-week series, and shot a lot of video thatou hav seen over the 10 wes from all over the country. matt has been our production assistant throughout. he has done a lot of the graphics and the work that goes on behind the sces. he is the one who has been answering the phone calls, too. i'm sure he'been veryolite. maurice haynes has been our director. he is a long time c-span ployee30 plus years, and is a terrific partner in this. i am goi to miss some names. but benyon has been here for the entire 10-week series. merry cements he is on audio. and eric is the floor director here. those are just a few of the nas. dozens of c-span peopleorked on this. a education department,ur website department, our promotions department. we appreate yr beinwith us. have a good even

thk we've offered special justifications in droves. specia justification beyond the decision. i do not kn a case where you would deferwhen the reva decisiondid not cite the relevant statue at al this would be a differen i suppose that i would have t be here making every ng story decide argument but that is not what chevron did. it didn't mention the relative stute. i don't want to be seen as running away from t srry this isis factors. i'm happtoalk the wall of themecause they are in our favor. the decision is tremendously unworkable. nobody knows what ambiguity is. ev my learned friend on the other side says there is no formula ford and that' s an elaborationat the government said the last time which is nobody knows what ambiguity means but that is rkability. let's talk authe brand x problems which are serious problems. i love the brand x case because it provides a perfect example of the flip-flop tt n happen but its not my only example. amicus briefs brief talk about thnaonal labor relatio board flip-flopping on everything. asked the little sisters about stability and relianc

back to what was your response -- irresponsible in the common-law text we kea poll and see if people thk it is irresponsible to get into fist fight at a sports event where tempers were ruing high, or what? >> i want to be really here that we are not using the term not just on civito describe colloquially anyone you might just drive is demonstrating nearest's ability in ma of those contacts that you just described in your hypotheticals. instead, in particular, the articulationofthat in civil tracking that language of the order here. responsibility been intrinsically tied it to the danger you would resent if you have a list offirearms that i would draw a furlough here to the principles articulated with respect to dangerous places unuaweapons in each of these categories >> just to hear, you are using responsible for the folder to dangerous for the sp the use of firearms or its correct. that is how we understand his and tradioin this context. the reason we use the term not responsible is beusthe standard of this ordinance so arcuted in haller d donald, repeated again and brewing. the reason

thk you r the opportunity to collaborate. i'm excited about the impact we will have working together. thank you. thank you, susan. i'd like to thank all of our sponsors for making this event possible. i hope that over the next three days you will walk away with fresh ideas, new solutions and examples of how to implement them on the ground. i encourage you to move beyond your traditional areas owork to explore new areas and potentially form new partnerships and collaborative efforts. thank you very much and i hope you enjoy the conference. and you fully acknowledge the participation of the following organization whose generous support makes this conference possible. we thank the following media partner for their participation at this event. we thank the milken institute strategic partners for their year round support of our work around the world. please welcome the panel to discuss closing gaps in health and health care moderated by cn medical correspondent maggie terrell. l right. well, hi, everybody. excited to get started.

i think it's also important, something people let's thk about when theyy talk about osi, it's not just what's out there. it's also what isn't out there that's important. so tracking, for example, what's being censored in a country is a really good sign of what those leaders consider to be their vulnerabilities. just a couple of the things one less thing i guess i would say, or maybe mac. one is that open source also helps analysts to check their own thinking. so there is a lot of amazing work out there as a mission whether it be academia or think tanks are others. one of the most important questions that intelligence analysts can ask themselves is how might i be wrong? and that requires humility and openness to others ideas, and you can find a lot of those other ideas to test yourself in open-source. and one less thing what a think about it going back to the video for a second. it highlighted the need for collaboration with the private sector and the intelligence community. i think that's really important. i couldn't agree more. one thing a kind of wish have been highlighted a little b

thk you. [applause] host: thank you those remarks, secretary yellen. we all appreciate you. we have a bit of time to do a little q&a before we go -- let you go to your next commitment. in your remark talked about how the economy is improving, we got a great gdp report, inflation has slowed down, market rates -- mortgage rates are falling, inflation has slowed down, but for many americans, specifically voters, they tell us the economy feels like it is headed in the wrong direction. how do we wrap ourw minds around the disconnect between very strong economic numbers but an absolute level of sentiment that one might think would be stronger given those results? sec. yellen: let me first mission, we have seen some turnaround in the sentiment in recent months. the university of michigan consumer sentiment index has moved up quite a lot. inflation is now a near-term, close to the lowest levels we have seen in that survey. so i think americans do believe inflation is under control. recently, i think it was last week, the axios survey showed that when people are asked about how they

thk you. "squawk box" is coming up next. have a great day.small businesses to thrive, they need to be smart, efficient, savvy. making the most of every opportunity. that's why comcast business is introducing the small business bonus. for a limited time you can get up to $1000 prepaid card with qualifying internet. yup, $1000. so switch to business internet from the company with the largest fastest reliable network. give your business a head start in 2024 with this great offer. plus, ask how to get up to $1000 prepaid card with qualifying internet. >>> good morning. welcome to earnings season. the next to wo hours, we hear fm blackrock and delta airlines and citigroup. we will get a new read on inflation and the ppi which is due out at 8:30 a.m. >>> and breaking overnight. the u.s. and uk launching air strikes on houthi rebels in yemen. the price of crude jumping 4%. it is friday, january 12th, 2024. "squawk box" begins right now. >>> good morning. welcome to "squawk box" here on cnbc. we are live from the nasdaq market site in times square. i

thk you so much. i could take some questions if anyone has any. thank you.o you have any questions? is it time to take some questions? do you have a question? all right. >> there areoo many families that don't have a father,. >> i think the root of the question was the fatherlessness crisis, have nuclear families have been diavored by a lot of government policies and how a successful company -- country is going to be rooted in strong families. i will tell you what we have done in florida, number one, my wife spearheaded this, she created something called hope florida. it recognizes that if someone is not only a single mother -- just give a government check and do that a create that kind of dependency. what she did was create and i know kim is working on this in wa. the care portal allows community stakeholders to be involved. charities are plugged in. individual volunteers are plugged in. does mom need suppo. in terms of putting your faith in the government bureaucracy, guess what happens? the churches will spring into action. charities will spring into acti

the keyboard warrior moniker is used for the very online people who justy online, you know, thk they'reou to take good people down. i get accused of it because, you know guess ultimately my active twitter is at least part of my demise. but i as i said, i was doing all these other things. i was attending every school board meetin school board recall in san francisco, which successful i led rallies. so i was a real life warrior to do y sll tweet from at jennifer sey? i do and what do you tweet about life covered. i treat a tweet i well i don't really have any rules for myself anymore. so i get to tweet about whatever i nt i definitely talk a lot about the impact to children. i don't want anyone to forget about this. it cannot happen again. our kids are suffering. this has impacted a generation of children. i tweet about issues of, you know, censorship, other various illiberaling right now in country. i don't know anything that teres me in the news with the benefit of a little bit of hindsight and time, would you change anything that you did during this period? no no, i think i did the rig

i think what they were, and this isxp what they explain and i thk i accept their explanation on thisthey are trying to develop a vaccine for the virus that represents a lot of different strains. they were trying to create this into they did have a contract erbut i don't think it was, i don't think there's any evidence that i've seen that electorally was. i don't think there was a sequence. that would be huge. cii think they had a contract to make the vaccine and people then say look they already knew before. there were hundreds of viruses she never revealed. she also took down the website that used to list all the sequences. there's also satellite pictures that show the hospital's full of cars unusually full of cars in november. there's also cell phone data and some private company had at the cell phone data. you look at the institute and for the week in october there's no cell phone traffic. only they can do that which is a little bit scary but if you had a leak we were cleaning the place out and all of a sudden there would be no cell phones. others evidence pointing toward somethin

heog: first of all, i don't thk we are carrying out any indiscriminate bombing. all of our plans are followed closely by legal counsel. i think we are one of the armies which has more lawyers in each unit in proportion than any other army. we check all targets, we alert people in advance, we send millions of leaflets, we send millions of text messages, we call people, give them hours to prepare. if it is questionable, we prefer not to carry out the attack. unfortunately, in such intense areas, there could be damages that are very tragic. we know it. but according to international law, we treat people very cautiously so there is no indiscriminate bombing. we seek advice, exchange opinions and views with our partners. one thing is clear. the people of gaza are not our enemy. the enemy is only hamas. we are fighting hamas and its partners. mary: i hear you saying that israel is taking ery precaution it can to alert people, send out leaflets to tell peoe where to go, to get ople hours to prepare. how should we square that, sir, with last week, one ofhe deadliest stke

i don't thinh thk we should be g along here but these continued's resolutions, which is what they arsoeking about if we don'th secure our own border. i've been really clear about this. which by the way, highlights whr we need individual appropriation bills. vethis honorable stuff, the peoe are tired of it.know i advocated for this and the debate should be syria miked separate.th this role should be separateamer from ukraine and we can isolate and deal with it and theyo american people can hold us tore account as opposed to come up at the stroke of midnight wassa something people haven't read anand say, "you either support this or we will shut down the government." we have to have a secure borderu >> i vt is no way to run the country. senator thank you for your time. it is easy to see why people ar. clamoring to come to the united states here illegally. they know can easily walk across the border, no razor wire, without dealing with all of the red tape if yoanu try to do it legally. and then they are told to show up at some court and as thet ye senator mentioned in a few yearm or seven o

a lot of people thk this is the original entrance. this isn't. this is wing b and was added by theodore weston who is a civil engineer. this is really the only building he ever did. this faces south towards where the city was. it is now part of the petri sculpture gallery which is wing y which was added in the '90s by kevin roach. i hope you are keeping track of the wings. there will be a test after it. this is an archival shot. that's an old image. to get your bearings you see cleopatra's needle, installed when central park was completed in 1880. another archival image, wing d, the original entrance. this is before the flanking wings were later added. just to get an idea of scale, you can see those carriages at the front. also look at the steps. they're bigger than original steps of the building which were treacherously steep and they were replaced and you see the wings that were added. you come into the great hall of the metropolitan museum, 166 feet long, 48 wide, three stories tall. you have to remember when this was built, there was not a sp

amas>> w >> we are talking about one of the top leaders in hamas designated as a terrorist by thk united during the trump administration, we announced $5 million bounty on his head foorr information leading to his arrest. he was a very important figure in hamas in terms of its political leadership, but he was also a key figure in terms of. planning attacks. back in 2014, he oversaw aon kidnapping operation which three israeli teenagers were captured ine iswere the west bank and uli ontie was a dual american citiz, which explains this guy under the radar screen in the united states. in a timely we are able tohe remove somebody like this from the battlefield,upt this will disrupt the terrorist organization to raise money, plot attacks, shed blood. we will wait and see what this means in terms of hamas' ability to retaliate and in terms of ability to carry out war against israel. y for israeliod da citizens and american citizens too. >> trey: i will switch gears with the ambassador and isisisis claims detonated killing a hundred people at a service for solomonic. how does that help isis to

the houthi strikes conif you thk of it, it's a motorcycle gang and a state that's run out of water andobal inflation. so the strikes are not working. iran continually replenish the stocks there in yemen as they did, as they have been for almost a decade when the saudis were bombing the houthis, so this tit-for-tat back and forth is going to continue. gillian: to that point, take a listen to national security council spokesman john kirby yesterday in the white house briefing. >> this morning, u.s. forces conducted three successful self-defense strikes against houthi targets in yemen. this is the fourth p preemptive action that prevent houthi attacks in this case anti-ship missiles. centcom, central command will have more details later, but as you know the u.s. navy ships in the red seas and international shipping. the actions, i want to emphasize, they were done in self-defense. gillian: when it comes to houthi operatives the common refrain out of the white house, these are defensive moves, going to great lengths to emphasize that in press briefings, but then they also describe these st

effective way that we can counter and deter the chinese in their malign influence in e indo pacif, and i thk that is incredibly important and important to us too to make sure that the supplemental that is coming up, the 3.4 billion dollars in the pplemeal for the submarine indurial base gets through. that helps us, the united states partner with dollars that australia has commted to make sure we build the submarine industrial base, we build number of suppliers. we've been working out with australians building the submare industrial base there. we need know more in the united states. i think historically will look back on this and see that this is the tuing point where weill be able to with joint capalities amongst the three countries have that turning pointo deter encounter chinese aggressionn the indo pacific. >> let me just china in -- chime in. i agree with my republan colleague, and wwere chatting before about how the armed services committee is one the last bastions of bipartisanship on capitol hil i think this is a complety bipartisan positn, so we are very supportive of it. i want to

returning the favor' butt she didn't have any documents, wasn't sure of her real birthdate andso didn't thk she had ever even had a birth certificate so gary had no idea where to turn. i jumped on this case with extreme fervor. i really wanted to get our first id but was also made it clear that her life depended on it. if i met her now. it would still be a real challenge but we would be able to help her. we know so much more now than we did back then about getting id. at the time we did everything we could. a volunteer went to her house in rural georgia, found old insurance policies and newspaper clippings we might have used as proof of life or delayed birth certificate. incredibly, her elementary school still had her transcripts. in some states youle can use t birth record of a family bible is aas birth certificate substitute but only if the preacher who wrote the record was still alive to sign an affidavit. himself a's childhood minister was not. we didn't know then that we could submit a freedom of information act request to the social security administration through an obscure document

e cot exchange regiment but they are not what we thk of. these guys are mostly employees the exchange. they do not know what ey are itis so bad that the 26-year- old quaker businessman by the name of arthur fark war gets in his carriage and sets out to find his college roommate. he cannot find him but he had found both of them if you come to new york don't earn my factory because he is supplying steel plows to the lee family among other people. he rides out trying to find lee but instead he finds john gordon on route 30. he says, all right. i will sorrento -- surrender york. i'm here on behalf of the women and children. he pulls out a map and the pennsylvania editor works. recognize this place? yes. it's my factory. i will tell you, we will come into your town tomorrow morning. by the way, jim worley will be -- jubal early will be coming in also. we will want cash, supplies, shoes and boots. we will want whatever else my commander tells you that we want. now leave. this poor, frightened 26-year- old sets a speed record with the buggy going

meanwhile, the media is like an in-kind conjuration to the democrats because they have a 24/7 attace thkause you have the oldest, most unpopular sitting president who is just sitting back and prosecuting his arrival whileria he's just laying back in an easy chair in delaware, and the media is colluding with the deep state to hatch this disinformation campaign, censorship campaign,di and now the baby boomeroo establishment inme washington, d.c., is basically, like, lettinshing everybody up n orgy of tyranny and corruption anuptid pretending they're savig democracy. e sameanwhile thvinge rest of te country is watching football and netflix and complain about the weather. this is the weirdest election ever. [laughter] >> judge jeanine: it's true. are you watching -- no. >> harold: what happened to jason kelce? speed when he retired. you will have to see my "one more thing." >> judge jeanine: let's go back to you. is thi s money going to do him any good? himhe's at 33%. >> harold: he's got a problem. a couple things, i like your confidence, but you said it best, you have ti lio have polif you

there's less money available for when the crisis hits to have a sense of how much i pull it out in thk the book with almost 100 trillion and i should not get the numbers wrong, but i was shocked and i remember looking into that at at some point. yeah. let me ask you about, the contemporary business model. á]'ve said a few things are reliant on government bailouts, innovation in the industry has gone left towards building supersonic jets or faster or more convenient and to trying to figure out how to shrink seats and, squeeze more of them into an airplane that's been like but also write about the quote from your book that airlines have from wall street that finance can be more profitable than industry and that now operate like banks. here's what you meant by that. yes. if anybody, a airline credit card in a way, you know what i mean? these card programs are longer like your local shop or sandwich shop, where you buy ten sandwiches and get the 11th one free. they're not frequent flier programs really anymore. they're actually a credit card spending programs where it's really about how mu