but that is not the overall view of the security council and ambassador thomas greenfield. when she spoke in the counsel singled out 2 countries, she said that we're enabling north korea, that we're protecting north korea in her words. now she didn't name those 2 countries, but i can tell you it's obvious from speaking to diplomat. she was referring to, to permanent members of the security council, china and russia at that. do not want to pursue any more sanctions against at north courier at this time. in fact, both of those countries were critical of the u. s. they were critical of south korea. they were critical of japan, the recent military drills. they said that all of what was happening was not just the response, a response to all the fault of north korea. it was because of a confrontation and mistrust is going on between north korea and the united states . it's pretty clear, even though things are getting tensor and tensor on the korean peninsula, the security council on this issue. and, and it's also obviously on other issues with ukraine. but on this issue hopelessl

is that about the thomas greenfield and those around her. and you can see the japanese and the south korean ambassador are to one side of her as well as other members of the security council . they're all in agreement of where things are and the need for tough action against north korea. but that is not the overall view of the security council and ambassador thomas greenfield. when she spoke in the counsel singled out 2 countries, she said that were enabling north korea that were protecting north korea in her words. now she didn't name those 2 countries, but i can tell you it's obvious from speaking to diplomat. she was referring to, to permanent members of the security council, china and russia at that. do not want to pursue any more sanctions against at north courier at this time. in fact, both of those countries were critical of the u. s. they were critical of south korea. they were critical of japan, the recent military drills. they said that all of what was happening was not just the response, a response to all the fault of north korea.

but that is not the overall view of the security council and ambassador thomas greenfield. when she spoke in the counsel singled out 2 countries, she said that we're enabling north korea, that we're protecting north korea in her words. now she didn't name those 2 countries, but i can tell you it's obvious from speaking to diplomats. she was referring to, to permanent members of the security council, china and russia at that. do not want to pursue any more sanctions against at north courier at this time. in fact, both of those countries were critical of the u. s. they were critical of south korea. they were critical of japan for recent military drills. they said that all of what was happening was not just the response, a response to all the fault of north korea. it was because of a confrontation and mistrust is going on between north korea and the united states is pretty clear. even though things are getting tensor and tensor on the korean peninsula, the security council on this issue and, and it's also obviously on other issues with ukraine, but on this issue hopelessly div

but that is not the overall view of the security council and ambassador thomas greenfield. when she spoke in the counsel singled out 2 countries, she said that we're enabling north korea, that we're protecting north korea in her words. now she didn't name those 2 countries, but i can tell you it's obvious from speaking to diplomat. she was referring to 2 permanent members of the security council, china and russia at that. do not want to pursue any more sanctions against at north courier at this time. in fact, both of those countries were critical of the u. s. they were critical of south korea. they were critical of japan, the recent military drills. they said that all of what was happening was not just the response, a response to all the vault of north korea. it was because of a confrontation and mistrust is going on between north korea and the united states . it's pretty clear, even though things are getting tensor and tensor on the korean peninsula, the security council on this issue. and, and it's also obviously on other issues with ukraine. but on this issue hopelessly

moscow that the papers on accession were signed, nevertheless, the american ambassador, linda thomas greenfield decided that time had not yet been lost. we are sitting in this room, and at this moment putin is blatantly trampling on our common values, it is time to protect them, therefore, the united states, together with albania, submitted this resolution. let's demonstrate to putin the determination of the security council, complete determination. however, russia, as a permanent member of the security council, failed to demonstrate. there is a right, a veto, and no chance of passing a vote. russian diplomats did not have such a resolution; they proposed to amend the document, but they were rejected. it was proposed to fix the call of the council to all the parties involved to intensify the train of the diplomatic way of resolving conflicts. shouldn't that be the goal of our joint efforts. it turns out that our former western partners once again signed that they really do not want peace in ukraine, they dream of the defeat of russia, and this is in the light of bitter hostility. the west put b

. >> linda thomas greenfield says u.n. delegates won't tolerate the destruction of their charter.ast month, pro russian officials held referendums in donetsk, they say the residents chose in favor of joining russia overwhelmingly. russia's ambassador said the votes were held in full accordance with the principles of international law. >> translator: expressions of commitment to the protection of international law that you heard today from representatives of the u.s. and other nato member states are a vivid example of hypocrisy and double standards. >> the readiness of u.s. leaders to use force to protect taiwan, which he said is a part of china. he says those in nato countries only support what suits their interests. 143 countries supported wednesday's resolution. that's the largest number for a resolution against russia since the invasion began. about 50 countries oppose or abstained from voting. >>> the next g20 summit in indonesia is about one month away, an opportunity for world leaders to talk policy and more. ♪ but u.s. president joe biden has no intention of meeting with on

evening, the papers on accession were signed, however, american permanent representative linda thomas greenfield decided that time had not yet been lost. let's demonstrate to putin the determination of the security council, complete determination. however, russia, as a permanent member of the security council, has not been able to demonstrate that it has the right of the century and no chance of such a resolution being voted on. there was no our former western partners once again signed that they really do not want peace in ukraine, they dream of the defeat of russia e 10 countries supported the resolution russia against four of them brazil and china abstained and judging by the statements, they did not quite abstain, supporting american position. the crisis in ukraine is the result of a whole mass of conflicts and tensions over a long time, the facts show that the political isolation of sanctions and pressure only fuels tensions, does not lead to peace after the security council moved on to the discussion of sabotage on pipelines nord stream 1.2. this meeting was initiated by russia, which cons

nuclear weapons and the size of the army, said the ukrainian diplomat, representative shalinda thomas greenfieldemphasized that the un was built on the idea that no country will be allowed to seize the territory of another by force after knowing peace will never be achieved if silence is the only way to bring peace stop this aggression demand responsibility together insist on condemnation show that we will not tolerate it so let's send a clear signal today the united nations will not tolerate the trials of illegal annexation we will never admit it this un will not allow the forceful seizure of a neighbor's territory we will resist this un will not allow the destruction of its charter we will defend it, as the secretary general of the organization said, russia's actions have no place in our modern world, today russia invaded ukraine, but tomorrow it could be another nation whose borders violated, you can be the next, what would you expect from this institution today, ukraine received a billion 300 million dollars from the international monetary fund, and the president of the world bank, david mal

at the band, the permanent representative of the united states to the united nations, linda thomas greenfield, called this meeting another waste of time. well, none the less we can invite representatives of the who, the specialized institute of nan of ukraine to come and check whether we have mosquitoes here, according to this logic, it can simply be spread all over the front line, everyone deserves some comment, but we see that this is the mechanism of their behavior in relation to each release, it is constantly calculated, the series with the dirty bomb has just ended, at least the first one, how do they move to the series with biological weapons and winter mosquitoes, this is just know-how, it is very cool a mosquito in winter or in the cold is and you know, they make it possible so that our analytics, er, even on our air, come down to this, we were just joking and smiling at each other, because it in no way deserves any serious evaluations but nevertheless, we have what we have, in any case, mr. sergey, i would like to understand the same way, despite all the fake bluffs and so on, what c

tried to ask a question about whether us troops were going to haiti to the us ambassador linda thomas greenfield. and she said, absolutely nothing and ignore my question as she walked into the security council. but i think one thing will be very sobering for the security council, and that's what's happening as they are meeting right now in new york was happening on the street support a prince because in the haitian capital, they're all protest taking place right now. angry protests that in places have been dispersed by tear gas. now the protest as that are saying, they do not want international forces back in haiti. in fact, a one point the protest is, had a coffin that they were carrying, and it may clear that the coffin represented canadian us or french troops if they were going to be sent to haiti. james bay. thank you very much indeed. heritage nigeria struggling to get relief supplies to hundreds of thousands of people displaced by severe floods. want 600 people have died and 1300000 people have been displaced by the worst plot. the country seen in a decade. 33 of nigeria is 36 states have

this is linda thomas greenfield, the u.s.tative to the united nations. >> the united nations will not tolerate attempts at illegal annexation. we will never recognize it. these united nations will not tolerate seizing a neighbor's land i force. we will stand up to it. these united nations will not tolerate the destruction of the u.n. charter. amy: 35 nations, including china and india, abstained from the u.n. vote condemning russia's annexation. this is gene shuang, china's deputy u.n. ambassador. >> we have always believed any action taken by the general a similar should be conducive to the de-escalation of the situation, should be conducive to the early resumption of dialogue and should be conducive to the promotion of a political solution to this crisis. the draft resolution submitted will not help achieve the above-mentioned objectives. therefore, the chinese delegation will abstain. amy: to talk more about the war in ukraine, we are joined by two guests. arshak makichyan is an exiled russian anti-war, human rights and cl

linda thomas greenfield without naming russia and china clearly said it's two countries that sit on the.n. security council who have given consistent cover for north korean actions. the big fear as we see these continued ballistic missile launches, the u.s. has said for months now it is north korea preparing for another nuclear test. >> thank you for the latest from the pentagon. >>> 33 days out from the midterm elections, republicans are making impeachment plans if they win control of the house. maybe not against who you think. they're zeroing in on secretary alejandro mayorkas. >>> the fallout continues for herschel walker. there's new details on this abortion scandal the gop senate candidate is fighting. you go by lots of titles. veteran, dad, hair stylist. so adding a student title might feel daunting. national university is here to support all your titles. national university. supporting the whole you. all across the country, people are working hard to build a better future. so we're hard at work, helping them achieve financial freedom. we're investing for our clients in the projec

. >> reporter: also at the united nations, ambassador linda thomas greenfield without naming russia and china saying the two countries on the security council were protecting and giving cover for north korea. erica. >> orren lieberman, appreciate it. thank you. >>> in ukraine, russia hitting zaporizhzhia with several missile strikes. one woman was kill and seven more people are trapped in the rubble. all of this happening as vladimir putin is now claiming the nuclear plant of the same name, which is just southwest of that town, as a russian federal asset prompting a trip to kyiv from the head of the nuclear watch dog agency. we are live into kyiv this morning. so prompting that big visit, what will come of it now, fred. >> reporter: well it is a very difficult situation at the iaea is with all of this going and at ukrainians and the russians are saying that power plant is theirs. they are the ones who own that power plant. of course the ukrainians are saying that is not the case. and it was quite interesting because the head of the ukrainian ato theic energy agency is said he is the bos

ambassador to the united nations linda thomas greenfield warned the other nations in the room ahead of that vote that some day they could be next. >> colleagues, the facts are clear. a u.n. member state, one a permanent seat on the security council, has attempted to annex territory from his neighbor by force. this u.n. member state has not only put its neighbor in its cross hairs, but also put a bulls eye in this institution's core principle. one country cannot take the territory of another by force. today it is russia invading ukraine. but tomorrow, it could be another nation's whose territory is violated. it could be you. you could be next. >> president biden also released a statement on the vote to condemn russia which reads in part, quote, nearly eight months into this war the world has just demonstrated it is more united and more determined than ever to hold russia accountable for the violations. together with the u.n. general assembly, we will not tolerate illegal attempts at annexation or the theft of a neighbor's land by force. a senior nato official confirmed that a russian nu

ambassador to the united nations linda thomas-greenfield pushed for the u.n.ty council to authorize a non-u.n. international security mission to go to haiti. >> the second resolution we are working on would authorize a non-u.n. international mission to help improve the security situation and enable the flow of desperately needed humanitarian aid. amy: but in the streets of haiti, many protesters have condemned the united states for pushing to intervene again in haiti. protesters are committing the resignation of ariel henry who has ruled since the assassination of moÏse in july 2021. this is jean-charles moÏse. >> freedom. we're not in the state of the united states. we are not pvinces of the united states. we are a country, a republic. they cannot give us orders. we do not need them. ariel henry does not resign and bank officials don't change their mind, we will revolution in the country. amy: we're joined now by guerline jozef, co-founder and executive director of haitian bridge alliance. it's an immigrant-advocacy organization that provides humanitarian ass

ambassador to the united nations, linda thomas greenfield is expected to speak in front of the body and preparing a resolution to condemn the russia annexation of the four regions in ukraine but what will another resolution against russia accomplish? what will that reveal here? >> it ril reveal the level of support in the general assembly. an earlier vote to condemn the russians was 141-5. and so the question will be what kind of support, if it has gone up or down on that. but you're exactly right. the u.n. resolution is not going to do it. what is going to make a difference is if the beyond statements by the u.n., beyond statements by president biden and secretary blinken, beyond statements, the ukrainians need weapons. they need more weapons to defend themselves against these kind of attacks. they need more weapons to push the russians out of their country. let's be clear. this is an unprovoked war. this is a -- there is no reason for this war. and ukrainians are defending their own territory. and they need weapons from us to be able to push the russians back. that's what's going to e

linda thomas greenfield says the wagner group is using resources from molly sedan and the central african republic to fund moscow's operations. the wagner group 1st came to public attention in 2014, during the annexation of crimea. since then, it's been accused of a number of atrocities including the mass killing of more than $300.00 civilians in money. 7 months ago, rushes dismissed the comments as anti russian rage. it's also denied any link to the wagner room. well, let's bring in a reader, leah morrila in washington dc. he's a senior fellow at the policy center for the new south vega to happy with a sir on al jazeera. and what little we know about the wagner group seems to describe them predominantly as armed fighters, some c mercenaries. what do we know about how they could be involved in moving money or resources from places like northern africa, for example, in order to be able to fund rushes fight in ukraine? thank you for having me here. it is very difficult to establish the real link between the wagner group are and the russian government, specially when it comes to finances and

ambassador to the united nations, linda thomas-greenfield warned the other nations in the room aheadts are clear, a u.n. member state, one with a permanent seat on the security council has attempted to annex territory from its neighbor by force. this u.n. member state has not only put its neighbor in its cross hairs, but also put a bull's eye in this institution's core principle, one country cannot take the territory of another by force. today it's russia invading ukraine, but tomorrow it could be another nation whose territory is violated. it could be you. you could be next! so with us, we have former cia officer, mark pollymoropolis, and editor at "the new york times" ed luce. >> he's going to get us up to date on cricket matches. >> jonathan lemire is with us along with joe, willie and me. i want to ask you, ed, let's talk about the saudis because there are international organizations, economists across the globe who are saying the saudi's vote, not the vote yesterday, but the saudis vote to cut oil production is exactly what one middle east politician told me after it happened. s