and i do think that you well to quote sir thomas moore. and i would just note that the law is a protection, but you have to follow it. and you have a rht and keep and bear arms. the judge should give that protection to people. and the right to other issues that you're entitled to have should be plainly interpreted. as we deal with the confirmation to the supreme court, i thought about it, a lot of people have discussed the role of the senate. it's pretty clear that the senate, along with the president, he nominates, are empowered by the constitution to constitute the supreme court. to put the nominees there. and the president that does get the nominating, any nominator should be given some deference. but it ultimately is an executive/legislative diussion about who should be confirmed to e court. constitutional responsibility to provide advice and consent to nominees to the supreme court is one of our most significant. it's not a coronation, but a confirmation. we owe it to the american people, to carefully examine any nominee, who may serv

and i do think that you well to quote sir thomas moore. and i would just note that the law is a protection, but you have to follow it. and you have a right and keep and bear arms. the judge should give that protection to people. and the right to other issues that you're entitled to have should be plainly interpreted. as we deal with the confirmation to the supreme court, i thought about it, a lot of people have discussed the role of the senate. it's pretty clear that the senate, along with the president, he nominates, are empowered by the constitution to constitute the supreme court. to put the nominees there. and the president that does get the nominating, any nominator should be given some deference. but it ultimately is an executive/legislative discussion about who should be confirmed to the court. constitutional responsibility to provide advice and consent to nominees to the supreme court is one of our most significant. it's not a coronation, but a confirmation. we owe it to the american people, to carefully examine any nominee, who ma

and thomas moore is a retired colonel and vietnam veteran. he flew 85 combat missions in vietnam and they were over north vet yam where he spent over five years and was released with operation homecoming in 1973. he received his ba from capital university and from the university of notre dame. please go ahead, colonel. >> thank you, chairman leahy and senator sessions and members of the committee for the opportunity to testify before this committee. i would like toec press my concern regarding the nomination of miss kagan to the supreme court for the following reasons. some of them are referring back to some of the reasons my colleagues have mentioned as well. chief among them is that she has demonstrated a strong bias against the military, particularly while dean of the hafb art law school, largely over policies concerning the eligibility of homosexuals to serve in the military. as we heard in 1993 congress passed and president clinton signed section 654, among other things, the law provided that the administration could omit ret choirment t

and thomas moore is a retired colonel and vietnam teran. he flew 85 combat missions in vietnam and they were over north vet yam where he spent over five years and was released with operation homecoming in 1973. he received his ba from capital university and from the unersity of notre dame. please go ahead, colonel. >> thank you, chairman leahy and senator sessions and members of the comttee for the opportunity to testify before this committee. i would like toec press my concern regarding t nomination of miss kagan to the supreme court for the following reasons. some of them are referring ba to some of the reasonsy colleagues have mentioned as wl. chief among them is that she has demonstrated a strong bias against the military, parcularly while deanof the hafb ar law school, largely over policies concerning the eligibility of homosexls to serve in the military. as we heard in 1993 congress passed and president clinton signed section 654, among other things, the law provided th the administration could omit ret choirment at persons joining th

choice between a tour defair with sweet sweet nancy pelosi and helen thomas than he might be for same sex marriage. when i see steve moore say if he has a bad day he thinks at least he's not mr. pelosi. i mean and she has a -- >> that is outrageous. >> that's unacceptable and we shouldn't, it happens on both sides. hillary clinton was attacked to. sarah palin, that is not acceptable. but there is enough meat on the bone here for republicans to go after nancy pelosi and her policies. and the stimulus package which was $787 billion we've lost 2.4 million and the job, lack of jobs in this country, that's what is going to sink the democrats. >> i do want to go to this new new deal as i'm calling it any anyway am will it work for or against the democrats in november, congresswoman norton. >> if, to be sure, if you look at the intense intensity of the tea party, you will say well, that's going to spread. those people were there all along. when members get home, and here's where nancy pell os syso wise. and relate what they did in congress to their own election, those of you who are calling the election, here in august, are goi