for ten years, detectives rick gregory and thomas smith continued to work the case following potentialds. >> there were two banker boxes full of leads. so, there was in excess of 400 leads. >> and the satterfield family never gave up either. >> i had people come up to me, ask me, have they caught him yet, have they heard anything? and i'm like, i know that they're still working on the case, but i don't think they're going to catch him, because i really didn't think they would. >> ashley satterfield was 8 years old when her mother was killed. now she was 18, in college and trying to move on with her life. one day, ashley took her car in for repairs and those repairs changed the course of the investigation. >> this girl came in with a little red honda and she got an oil change, and i was like, man, she was just in here a couple of weeks ago. and they were like, yeah, that's ashley satterfield. you know dana satterfield that was murdered. and they said, that's her daughter. and i said, i didn't know she had kids. >> this man is an automatic mechanic and knew something about dana satterfie

adam smith would tell us that laissez isn't fair. i think thomas jefferson would have said the more speech, the better. the sage of monticello never equated operations with citizens. he warned future generations not to embrace aristocracy. this nightmare vision sounds like a citizens united aero. the majority of americans are appalled. 74% of voters in colorado and montana voted to call for this amendment. 79% of the people favor limits on campaign money. this amendment protects our power to set such limits. billionaires will always have greater resources, but it is shores the rich will inhabit the same polity as nurses, businesses, and small people. it is one thing to tell middle-class citizens that the scale is 50-1. a regime like that fits plutocracy, not democracy. i think the amendment should empower the people to wall off campaigns from corporate treasury wealth. citizens united does not increase the rights of citizens to express views. all it did was confirm our on ceos to write checks without a vote of the shareholders and without notice to

just heard dr thomas politan about how the same people who got it wrong before the crises continue to be the ones off we advise and commentary throughout the crisis and today no with smith on bloomberg. comfortable truth the reason we don't really know why recessions happen or how to fight is that we don't have the tools to study them properly this is the situation biologists were and when they were trying to fight disease before they had any microscopes not only did they not have the right tools they didn't even have any way of knowing what the right tools would be so. that's a very interesting and provocative way of looking at this kind of will use this as a jumping off point for thinking about economics do we have the right tools do we have the right frameworks for understanding the economy well and perhaps more important question is does it matter we were treating bacterial infections with moldy bread penicillin for a thousand years before eventually when hook was able to look through a microscope we may have imperfect tools to predict recessions or depressions but we know that from the george washington illustration until nine hundred thirty two united states never

just heard dr thomas politan about how the same people who got it wrong before the crises continue to be the ones off we advise and commentary throughout the crisis and today no with smith on bloomberg writes the comfortable truth is the reason we don't really know why recessions happen or how to fight is that we don't have the tools to study them properly this is the situation biologists were and when they were trying to fight disease before they had any microscopes not only did they not have the right tools they didn't even have any way of knowing what the right tools would be so. that's a very interesting and provocative way of looking at this kind of will use this as a jumping off point for thinking about economics do we have the right tools do we have the right frameworks for understanding the economy well and perhaps more important question is does it matter we were treating bacterial infections with moldy bread penicillin for a thousand years before eventually when hook was able to look through a microscope we may have imperfect tools to predict recessions or depressions but we know that from the george washington illustration until nine hundred thirty two united

thomas muller. they doubled their advantage with a powerful ed hadder from defender matt smith.ontroversy struck shortly before avenue time when pepe was sent off for an aggressive gesture. germany took advantage and would score again before halftime. muller completed the hat trick before the 4-0 win. now usa made history with dempsey scoring the attorney many's fastest ever goal after just 29 seconds. sustained pressure finally paid off in the 82nd minute with andre smashing the ball past tim howard. the usa's john brooks headed in a dramatic late winner for 81 wins. you can see it there. there we go. now, today's big game is at 9:00 and the host, brazil, gets to build on a strong start as they face mexico. belgium takes on algeria at 1800 ceo. timely, russia will take on south korea in the day's final match. i'm not sure if the host can ov overcome its game today. real really? the turtle has given his prediction. he sig foyed a draw. he then went on to eat the fish under the sought korean flag. or maybe he should just really hungry, maybe. >>> still to come on the show, the br

you just heard dr thomas politan about how the same people who got it wrong before the crises continue to be the ones off we advise and commentary throughout the crisis and today no smith on bloomberg writes the comfortable truth the reason we don't really know why recessions happen or how to fight is that we don't have the tools to study them properly this is the situation biologists were and when they were trying to fight disease before they had any microscopes not only did they not have the right tools they didn't even have any way of knowing what the right tools would be so. that's a very interesting and provocative way of looking at this kind of will use this as a jumping off point for thinking about economics do we have the right tools do we have the right framework for understanding the economy well and perhaps more important question is does it matter we were treating bacterial infections with moldy bread penicillin for a thousand years before eventually when hook was able to look through a microscope we may have imperfect tools to predict recessions or depressions but we know that from the george washington illustration until nine hundred thirty two united sta

. >> senator smith, i want to read from justice scalia's dissent. scalia, breyer, thomas, dissent. on remand, justice scalia writes, one of the first questions the lower courts will face is whether areo's record function which allows subscri subscribers to save a program while it is airing and watch it later infringes the network's public performance right. >> yeah, that's certainly something yet for the courts to decide, and it will be remanded, but what was upheld today was the fundamental constitutional principle that you can't take someone else's copyrighted intellectual property and resell it without dealing with the owner of that copyright, so, you know, however future cases develop, that principle was decisively established and settled by the supreme court today. >> that was a portion of this week's "communicators" program with gordon smith, head of the n.a.b. you can see the complete show on saturday at 6:30 p.m. eastern on our companion network, c-span. >>> what i have right here is a partially processed plant that i've cut down into sections that are the right length for

. >> host: senator smith i want to read from justice scalia's dissent scalia breyer thomas dissent. on remand is justice scalia writes one of the first questions the lower courts will face is whether aereo's record function which allows subscribers to save a program while it is airing an watch it later infringes the network's public performance right. >> guest: yeah i mean that's certainly something for the courts to decide and it will be remanded but what was upheld today was the fundamental constitutional principle that you can't take someone else's copyright of intellectual property and resell it without dealing with the owner of that copyright. so however future cases develop that principle was decisively established and settled by the supreme court today. >> the supreme court ruled in favor of digital privacy wednesday in a unanimous decision stating that police need a warrant before searching a cell phone or personal electronic device of a person may rest. "the new york times" reports chief justice john roberts writing for for the court says the vast amount of data contained o

adam smith favored honest competition would tell us that in campaign finance, less isn't fair. when justice scalia went on cnn, he invoked everyone's favorite founder. thomas jefferson would have said, the more speech the better, he opined. he voiced dread at the prospect of plow took kracy. -- founded on banking institutions, riding and ruling over the plow men. this nightmare vision sounds a lot like the citizen's united era. the vast majority of americans are appalled. 89% oppose citizens united. 794% of voters in colorado and montana voted to call for this amendment. in 79% of the people favor limits on campaign money. this amendment protects our power to set such limits, not by creating perfect equality. billionaires will have greater resources but by ensuring that the rich will inhabit the same as the nurses, small business leaders and middle class people. it's one thing to say that their 100,000 dollars contribution is to go up against a 5,000 dollar contribution, but not up against a $50 million contribution. i do think the amendment should more clearly empower the people to wall off campaigns from corporate treasury wealth which has been seen as a