thomas welch designed many buildings for the archdiocese. it was enlarged with the addition of a sanctuary that was part of the original design. you can see the article that shows that alteration. the city was largely destroyed, but the church or escaped destruction and it remained open providing spiritual and physical sustenance. the church was basically finished which included the windows, the altars, and the painting of jesus. i have a couple of slides. like the majority of other catholic churches, her heart was designed with the revival style. not to go into details of the style, but the origins date back to the earliest christian architecture. during the course of my resrch -- [chime] i discovered that the design source is probably not this but likely the memorial church in new york city. i'm just wanted to wrap up by saying it is a landmark of the most fundamental way. welch designed it from the heart of teh c -- the city. that concludes my presentation. >> would still be possible to land market? >> -- would it still be possible to lan

the building was constructed between 1896 and 1907, it was designed by thomas welch.those were installed in the 1909, -- to the windows were installed in 1909. they were shortly thereafter put into the building. the department issued a violation for removal of features without benefit of permit and for not going to the ceqa, the california environmental quality act process. it would have to be followed regardless of what is going on. ceqa needs to happen first. in 1993, the advisory board had recommended approval

the building was constructed between 1896 and 1907, it was designed by thomas welch.those were installed in the 1909, -- to the windows were installed in 1909. they were shortly thereafter put into the building. the department issued a violation for removal of features without benefit of permit and for not going to the ceqa, the california environmental quality act process. it would have to be followed regardless of what is going on. ceqa needs to happen first. in 1993, the advisory board had recommended approval of the landmark designation of this church. there is a designation report that was done at that time, and for some reason, that designation did not go through to the board of supervisors. it had been on the radar as being eligible has an individual landmark. we had been working with dbi to make sure that there was no make sure that there was no other work going on without them