by focusing on zero thruput at a specific intersection, we can better focus litigation's on the projects, which ultimately serve transit. we find using l.o.ws.l today can be in feasible and in contradiction to our broader priorities and policies. many of these are long-standing. 40 years ago it was adopted. what we find is as we are solving for speed of automobile throughput, litigation may be to expand roadway capacity, adelaide of traffic coming and that can be in contradiction to our other goals. for example, establishing a safe and secure biked network or insuring pedestrian safety. -- bike network or insuring pedestrian safety. we also find the last project that comes in that tips the scale from accessible to an acceptable in terms of how quickly the automobiles are moving through the area and of being with 15 years of activity. so by establishing this program we feel we will be able to provide a more equitable approach to achieving the necessary medications to growth as we move forward. so in terms of what this means or what the program would need for development projects, all proj