accessibility, the tiberi terminal was designed to meet the current accessibility codes. we work very closely with the mayor's office of disability, as well as the dpw disability access coordinator, and white house for the blind. that has been operating well. we have not had any accessibility issues reported. finally, on operations, link facilities. the facility manager is working closely with tjpa as well as ac transit and greyhound to maintain the temporary terminal operations and security. we also have the transit rider of restrooms. link is seeing roughly about 50 passengers a day use the rest rooms, with no reported incidents. finally, the temporary terminal serves approximately 20,000 passengers a day, and it has recently completed one year of operation, and we think it is operating very well. that is the end of my report. any questions? >> that is the para transit service, i believe? >> yes. >> you have accessibility issues than on moving these things, and you are aware of those? continuous path, accessible paths? >> yes. >> i am sure kaiser permanente has some of

tiberi of ohio. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. tiberi: i want to see folks in south korea driving fords, chevys and chryslers, i want to see more products sold in -- to the rest of the world stamped made in america. i support the president's effort. our chairman's effort in crafting these three agreements before us today. in fact i asked ambassador kirk earlier this year in our fl committee, how many jobs did he think would be created? his estimate was 250,000 u.s. jobs that would be supported through these three agreements. in ohio, madam speaker, agriculture is still the number one industry. we believe, the trade ambassador agrees that we should see an increase in exports to south korea and the three other countries of 55 million per year. this is about jobs, madam speaker. this is about exports. this is about leveling the playing field. i urge my colleagues to support the agreement. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from michigan, mr. levin. mr. levin: it's now my pleasure to yield a minut

tiberi of ohio. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. tiberi: i want to see folks in south korea driving fords, chevys and chryslers, i want to see more products sold in -- to the rest of the world stamped made in america. i support the president's effort. our chairman's effort in crafting these three agreements before us today. in fact i asked ambassador kirk earlier this year in our full committee, how many jobs did he think would be created? his estimate was 250,000 u.s. jobs that would be supported through these three agreements. in ohio, madam speaker, agriculture is still the number one industry. we believe, the trade ambassador agrees that we should see an increase in exports to south korea and the three other countries of 55 million per year. this is about jobs, madam speaker. this is about exports. this is about leveling the playing field. i urge my colleagues to support the agreement. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from michigan, mr. levin. mr. levin: it's now my pleasure to yield a min

tiberi is recognized. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i want to be to the committee of the record a quote. this is the quote. if americans can buy key is an hyundais i want to see folks in south korea driving force in chevys and chrysler's. i want to see more product sold around the world stand with these three proud words, made in america. that's what we need to get done. i know you couldn't agree more, mr. chairman, i couldn't agree more. what was said last month by a president, barack obama. i would like to submit for the record a letter from ambassador kirk which outlines detail of ustr's intend related to provision of trade remedies, the trade remedies chapter in the south korean agreements. and it's something i think everybody on this committee wants to make sure is part of the record. >> without objection. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i yield back. >> thank you. mr. mcdermott is recognized. >> mr. pascrell. >> thank you, mr. chairman. before i get into my line of questioning, i want to say that this legislation is very much better

nextgen, so my question is, your people at the faa, surely they have done an analysis concerning tiberivarious proposals in congress. there are proposals in congress that would cut faa anywhere from five to 10% in the capital and operating budgets including accounts for nextgen. so, regardless of where we are and how much should be cut and how much shouldn't because i think we have the responsibility in the agency has a responsibility to tell us how various proposals will affect the implementation of nextgen. i said in my opening statement that throwing money at this issue or any issue is not the only answer. there are other things that have to be done in order to make sure that nextgen is implemented in an efficient and effective way, but obviously you have to have the funding to move forward. so my question to you is, there are proposals in the congress now to reduce your operating budget, which will in fact affect nextgen. have you done an analysis from a budgetary standpoint as to what a 1%, what a 5%, what a 10% cut would do as far as the progress that the agency is making with the