board -- nothing against the tida board, but conceptionualy that the tida board then has land use controls apart from the planning commission. and there are various smaller things in here that have to do with the number of days, but those are minor objections of mine. and then the d for d, i have some minor comments here. it seems to me the marina is adjacent to the large promenade area that has no parking. i'm not a sailor but i have gone sailing with people and they bring a lot of stuff with them and if you're serious about staying out on the bay, bring coolers and other things and it would seem that it would seem that people would want to drive right to the slip to unload all of the stuff. it does not seem like that kind of provision has been made. this is chapter 04 0.1 0.4. this is mentioned in the eir work. previews of the historical buildings would be done by the title board. the city has something called proposition j, which affected the charter. it would be interesting to me, not tonight, but i believe this is in the past. at some point, we could examine the relationship with prop

the navy at somewhat in time will convey treasure island in parcels to tida. when they do that, we have to have another agreement on how they provide utility services, on an ongoing operation to the island. right now, we're just doing cost recovery with the navy, operating their facilities. as i mentioned, we will provide design criteria to be constructed by the developer, a process for accepting the utilities. after the utilities are actually built, there is a process we go through for you to except those utilities. once you accept those utilities, it has certain responsibilities and obligations on your part. you would then own, operate, and maintain those facilities, so it is very important that you understand that they are a process for you to go through and look at that. we also have construction inspection services. i think this is important, that all the facilities that will be built, we will have city construction inspectors on site overseeing the work done by the developer to insure that it is done to our specifications. so what is the developer for wr

process has been extensive, and on the april 9 meeting, we took action on the recommendation to the tida board approvals of the final transaction and recommendation entitlement documents, including the items on your agenda today. of the current 24 members, 21 were present, and 20 voted for it and one against. in addition, the four residents of -- for residents of treasure island who sit on the cab voted in favor of the recommendation. i hope you look forward to -- you move forward to the full board with you're a busy at the recommendation is very exciting project and additional neighborhood to san francisco. thank you for this time. >> i guess good afternoon, supervisors. i represent spur, san francisco planning and urban research association. spur has been following this and supporting it for all the years it has been going on, and we urge you to approve the items on the agenda and move it forward. we have a different out what somewhat than our other speakers in that we are interested in the physical planning of the project and want to point out that this is really the only opportunity

we have been working with the city and tida to renovate housing originally when it was turned over from the navy in, and we have been managing it ever since. while we are not a paid consultant, we have been working with the developers for the past six years on the proposed project plan, including the housing transition plan. wearing my various hats, i find the plan to be an ambitious, well thought out, and well balanced development proposal that will generate very significant public benefits for san francisco and the bay area, including affordable and market rate housing, jobs, tax revenues, retail activity, new park space, so i urge your support of the proposal and a yes vote today. thank you very much. supervisor chu: thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i am president of the treasure island museum association. i would like you to get a picture in your mind but taking the ferry boat over from the embarcadero, and you come to the island and you go in through the dock. you get up and walk over to building one, and after you have gone through building one, you see the opportunity f

so it sets forth a process that includes the process for tida to review projects in the public trust areas and the ability to comment on those and provide comment as part of their review. so i went through that process. i guess with that it concludes our presentation. we are happy to answer any questions. >> i am wondering if any staff were go to report on the transportation? >> here is a resource to help with issues or clarifications i can offer. i know we had questions about the reduction from 30 fors 25%. i know questions were raise body it. we have the director of the mayor's office of housing. if you can give us more specifics of the work at the state level and even as concrete as possible what we are doing to insure we will raise the 25% base to 30% if the money comes in from the state. >> i'm sorry if i missed the previous questions, i was outside. it is disappoint to get to this stage and lose this percentage as a core baseline. i think a couple of things are at work in the document. one, the ability in the event that we are successful with state legislation whether i.f.c. le

the way the mechanism works and tihdi doesn't become a redevelopment agency, the proposal for the tida board to retain all land use decision making i think is not a good policy for the city and the comparison chart that was given to us by staff had the former way, the redevelopment scenario approvals worked and the way the s.u.d. approval structure works and it's a concern to me that the street scape master plan, for example, that's listed here, the parks and open space master plan, are all approved by tida board and not the commission. i would think t

have done to bring this project to fruition and want to thank in particular tihdi staff and board, tida, and good neighbors for the work you have done, and continually advocating with my office over the last couple of weeks. affordable housing is one of our main priorities, something we have identified as being a continued need for the city of san francisco. we want to house people. we want people to be able to afford to live in the city. it is good policy and important for our environment. the jobs are here. we need to make sure people can afford to live here and do not have to choose between higher rental and housing costs or high transportation costs. i think treasure island is an important part of that. i will just say -- the last thing i will say is that i do host office hours in district 6, and i will be on treasure island on may 23 from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. at boys and girls clock. please come see me in my office. we would love to hear from residents about concerns or things that are going well on treasure island. i do have some questions about some of the items in front of us and a

we have a separate agreement between tida and the treasure island homeless development initiative. a primary component of that plan is a housing component, but it also has a job training component and economic opportunities, so that is a policy goal that we would fill 25% of all jobs through our partnership with them, but we would also work with the office of work force development arm to bring folks -- formerly homeless folks to the job portion. and and maybe i'm not hearing clearly, but you are saying 25% of all the jobs? >> right. then let it just seems like pie in the sky. dam it to expect that work force is available and trained and ready to be accessed. but that is the goal. >> ok. commissioner courtney. commissioner courtney: i agree. perhaps we should try to develop on what disadvantaged -- >> we can provide some specifics and bring this information back to you to lay out a little bit more broadly what the components of the job program are, just so you have a fuller understanding. i personally have not worked on that plan. there are others in our office that have, and we ca

, there is a dedicated 46 acres that the puc would own, or in a long-term lease with haida -- with tida. we could use that if it were not on the actual building. so there are options that we have there. >> thank you. than anything else? then adjust the oversight. >> great. thank you very much. >> i have a question. homeless or disadvantaged persons fell 25% -- fell 25% of all jobs. >> back into the additional slides in there. >> do you happen to have a slide number? >> sustainability assets, right? >> down and in the left-hand corner. >> right, so one of the other documents that would

the way the mechanism works and tihdi doesn't become a redevelopment agency, the proposal for the tida board to retain all land use decision making i think is not a good policy for the city and the comparison chart that was given to us by staff had the former way,

mechanism which will be put in place as well as an adaptive management strategy and reporting program that tida would report on every five years. it would look at science and local conditions with respect to actual sea level rise, and then make recommendations for the types of improvements that would be made in the coming five years as well as funds collected in order to make those improvements. given that, we feel that we have a plan in place that provides protection both with respect to seismic risks, tsunami risks, and potential future sea level rise. supervisor mirkarimi: this comports with bcdc's standards as well? >> absolutely. they have held us up as a model in the bay area for how you address potential future sea level rise. supervisor mirkarimi: i am aware that they are grappling with trying to have a regional definition of sea level rise right now, trying to get input from both public and private sector on that particular definition. ok, very good. i appreciate the answer to the question. just curious, what is the sinkage rate of treasure island right now? >> that is a technical answ