under the dda, tida has the mission but not the requirement to improdevelop these properti. if they don't, they are supposed to put them out as an auction for a development opportunity. and in terms of opportunity for building one and hangar two, it's within ten years of major phase approval. again, as a reminder for folks, major phase approval occurred in 2015, so we -- it would be within ten years of that or by 2025 to be entered no a bdda or auctioned off those sites, and for hangar three, it's an additional five years by 2030. the development of the mixed-use blocks, m 1 a and m 2 a, there's not a time constraint; however, there is -- that is the retail main street that connects building one to hangar two. on the noncritical commercial lots, it provides that ticd shall enter into an auction for the rights to the vertical development opportunities for here. this includes as i mentioned, both hotel sites on treasure island and yerba buena island as well as for the buildings kpriezing the strategic -- the senior officers' quarters district. and the timeline for the ybi hote

>> hearing none, next item. >> item number four, communications from and received by tida. were several residential advisories, news publications and media publications among others. >> any public comment? i would just like to note in the communications that we got there's a very good newsletter which was put together by a working group of residents. it's a community newsletter, the treasure island news, and i that you s thought it was an excellent description of what was going on on treasure island, various meetings, ymca. so i would urge people who are interested in that to sign up for that community newsletter. it's tinnews@outlook.com is where you can subscribe. item five, please. >> item five is ongoing business by board of directors. >> are there any ongoing business by any directors? seeing none, next item, please. >> there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the authority board so requests, in approximate which event the matter shall be removed from the consent agenda and considered as a separate item. 6-a, approving the minutes of the f

. >> and that would protect tida and the community itself. >> of course. >> okay. can we have public comment? is there anybody who would like to address the board on this issue before we take action? if you could come up. >> okay. i found out that there was a skate park there, and it didn't have approval from the board, right? so there's something existing already on the island that doesn't have approval from the board, and it looks like it was done by do-it-yourselfers, you know, that people were just trying to help the community, not hurt the community. i mean, unless you put explosives underneath them, we should all be fine. so i hope that you consider having a skate park somewhere safe on the island where we know it's all clear, and we know that there's, like, people that get paid to say this is actually safe for young men and women. so any ways, i do think this is a great idea. however, we should probably see what's going on and who's doing it. thank you. >> thanks. anybody else from the public? hearing none, the -- we've got a motion and a second. all those i

frame for that, but looking back on the records of the public meetings and the presentation of the tida board, the presentation was around that potential five to eight years following the execution of the dda, and even when you consider the roughly three-plus year delay that we had for the ceqa litigation, we're entering the front end of that window. when you take out that, we're about to leave the back end of that window. so i think we may be recommending that sometime in the near future, potentially next fiscal year, we make an early offer to households that won't be able to stay through the development of a replaceme replacement unit, but subject to further conversation. on the affordable housing options, you know, there's -- there's a lot to cover with the residents on what it takes to be qualified, but one thing that is kind of clear in the way that the thr and r's were drafted, they--they're drafted with the assumption that if someone could potentially qualify for an affordable unit, they would certainly pursue it. and those -- so that under the thr and r's, the default for failin

. >> well, i would like to see in the last tida meeting, when that temporary housing on the island, i think we need to bring that back for further discussion so we can understand the rules for engagement. we're going to have temporary housing on the island, what is the definition of temporary housing? that land in terms of geology, infrastructure, waste water, and what are the agreements? so we still need to, you know, have some dialogue in that. and of course, with the legal counsel, also. so you know -- and the top parties. so we're all trying to protect top parties and others can understand, you know, what our obligations are and all the parties before we get to the next level. i think at this onset, we all need to formulate all these agreements before we get in there because at that department meeting, there will still be assessments and construction of that soil. again, geology applications, waste water, because if you're constructing temporary on an island that we know that the land, geologically, i know, we already have distributed -- we're still trying to develop the infrastru