>> on tida. some familiarity. >> stakeholder that we can bring in. >> there may be some opportunities for some real collaboration there. >> yeah. >> i would like to move the item. >> i'll second. >> president caen: public comments on this item. all those in favor? opposed? certainly had quite a bit of input. next item, please. >> item 15, approve a form allowing cleanpowersf customers to receive supergreen 100% renewable energy service under a multi-year service agreement. >> utility specialist with cleanpowersf, here to request your approval of a form agreement to allow cleanpowersf customers to enter multi-year green service. primary goal enable large commercial customers to enter into the agreement, but anticipate the agreement could be used more broadly for my customer who wants to demonstrate a commitment through green power and cleanpowersf. a little background. lead as you probably know is a widely used building certification system for green buildings. administered by the green building c

so we cannot use our rate payers. >> we are a contractor out there to tida, and tida has the relationship with the u.s. navy and we are not accepting their infrastructure. >> and we never will. >> we never will. the permit is actually still held by the u.s. navy. so we are literally just a contractor there. that's for all the utilities, water, wastewater and power. >> they could not issue the contract to somebody else, right? >> we have actually, the contract to operate on the island? i mean, tida could, but we have been out there since the island was turned over to the city for development. what we were expecting was a very short time frame before the developer would develop the island. it's now been 18 years, something around there. >> been a long time. >> been a long time. so, they are out there now, they are on yerba buena island, they are moving down into treasure island fairly soon, and we just, we see the long sort of like build-out, it's going to take some time. the treatment plant is key to the development of the island because the existing plant takes too many resources from us

so with these five projects, tida's replacement unit obligation will be met. and the unfunded gap for these five projects is $170 million. this is, again, before project-generated funds are applied,but after tax credits, and one state source per project. and two parcels will be available in major sub subphase one, that could be developed as soon as funding is available. so the ability to provide 800 units on treasure island would actually be a significant impact for the affordable housing crisis in san francisco if funds can be achieved. and there is the pretty picture. >> thank you very much for that excellent presentation. so we have five minutes. commissioner shan and the other commissioners can respond for five minutes of questions. >> thank you very much for that very comprehensive overview of the affordable housing program. i think it is great for us to be reminded of our initiative and, actually, our obligation to build affordable housing on treasure island. the rising construction costs, of course, are just having an impact on not only affordable housi

>> pier one has transferred to tida. so we own it. we have a commercial lease with bay ship and yacht. and they do -- so they're doing some vessel maintenance, with third parties out there. but that is -- has been transferred to tida and it's under our management. >> commissioner dunlop: great. and back to the project on hand, i mean, boy, that does sound wonderful. and we can get more -- just more public space and something so beautiful, giving a very expansive view of the bay. is there any potential costs to us on that? or is it pretty much -- >> at this time caltran is retaining ownership, so they have the long-term responsibility. for the facility and bata is agreeing to reimburse us for the maintenance costs. so right now there's no cost exposure under the proposed agreements. >> commissioner dunlop:. >> commissioner richardson: quick question, mr. beck, with regards to the pedestrian access and some of these are really very steep areas, you know, around mccollum road and you're going to be having vehicular access. have a special

you still have not received the full fiscal analysis that you requested from tida. this is particularly disturbing because the state of california has found that this project represents a significant risk of

so the structure of our agreement on treasure island is that tida takes all of our commercial revenues, and we use that to support not only island operations, but development-related activities, like the costs of p.u.c. and public works. that would have otherwise been borne directly by ticd. in the later years of the program where our revenues no longer cover expenses, then ticd is obligated to make up that delta. but it probably would be a useful exercise -- and we've had some, you know, internal conversations about -- for instance, we have many storage companies on the island, and at certain point we're going to need space for construction staging and contractor staging, and we may need to shed some of those commercial tenants. >>> so we've looked at how that might occur over time. but we haven't necessarily translated that into the revenue picture. and we could go through that exercise, looking at how our particularily commercial revenues would be expected to decrease over time. >> i think it would be helpful, mr. beck, since we have some new board members as well, to do an overview

you still have not received the full fiscal analysis that you requested from tida. this is particularly disturbing because the state of california has found that this project represents a significant risk of default. as a result there's a significant risk that the city of san francisco is going to end up with a half-built marina that will block access to the rest of clipper cove. the environmental analysis on the eel grass bed says continued to be punted, which is a seqa violation because the city cannot defer environmental analysis to another agency. there's a division about moving forward so i can only speak for myself personally at this moment. i think that both leases should move forward, but the board should work to ensure that fiscal analysis and environmental review is done before the body leaves the board entirely. >> president fewer: thank you very much. any other speakers to speak on item 7 or 8 i 8? seeing none, public comment is closed. yes, supervisor stefanie. >> supervisor stefani: thank you, chair, fewer. i have a few questions. what happens if the t

and tida also needs to demonstrate that we've done everything to accommodate the residents. so it is a major item that this commission will need at some point to stand up to, to explain how they conducted that. so let's revisit everything we can with regards to the outreach, and every meeting, even with the general meeting for the board, i thank the commissioners should continue to ask about -- ask questions about the outreach, as we've been doing all along. no other commissions' suggestions. please, for the next thing on the agenda. >> meeting adjourned. >> okay. thank you very muc adjourned. >> shop & dine in the 49 promotes local businesses and challenges residents to do their shop & dine in the 49 with within the 49 square miles of san francisco by supporting local services within the neighborhood we help san francisco remain unique successful and vibrant so where will you shop & dine in the 49 my name is jim woods i'm the founder of woods beer company and the proprietor of woods copy k open 2 henry adams what makes us unique is that we're reintegrated brooeg the beer an

and issues regarding water transportation in general, i think for 2019, tida would like to be involved in the overall discussion so we might be ringing this back for further discussions. anything as you would like to put on the agenda for consideration? okay. >> two quick things. to matt and the pole -- timma and the pole got a lot of things excited. perhaps that can be a citywide cause because it is a citywide benefits. just looking towards the future, secondly, the issue about the testing, and so if we could have some information as soon as it's available, we don't know about treasure island, but certainly there has been some conversation about the company over hunters point. we do have some information, and certainly not before. >> thank you so much. thank you for joining us for your time. thank you to all of our guests and the staff today. this concludes the, is that correct, meeting. see you next time. thank you. [♪] >> we start with the pledge of allegiance. will everyone please rise and join us in the pledge of allegiance. [pledge of allegiance] >> president stansbury: roll call

right now sfpuc and the wastewater enterprise provides service out there under a contract to tida and the reason for that, the facilities out there today were built over many years by the united states navy. they are not owned by the p.u.c., and so we maintain and operate those facilities under this o and m contract. that typically gets renewed each year and i think the last renewal was just in front of the commission in the last couple of months, and that gets again renewed each year. so, some of the challenges we have out there right now is that this is a system that again is depending on what part you are looking at, from 50 to 75 years old. it was not built and maintained to what you call p.u.c. utility standards. partly because of that, it has a relatively excessive amount of permit violations, and by permit violations, we mean overflows in the collection systems or improper water quality discharges from the old treatment plant. one of the challenges for the p.u.c. at the moment is that maintaining the treasure island facilities under this current contract requires the resources

and they are presenting at the april tida board meeting. you'll hear directly from them about their project. >> and how many stories max? >> it's still 10 stories. >> okay. >> and they actually have a different height limit than parcel c3.1. and along avenue c, it's a little bit shorter. >> lastly on the replacement, again a little clarification here. are we matching -- i mean, we are providing affordable housing, we're not necessarily matching four bedrooms before and now you're going to be getting four bedrooms. that's not -- we're matching approximately to what you can get. because, yeah, is that -- >> i mean, we have to -- per the d.d.a., there's a certain number of households that have replacement unit benefits. and those units need to be matched based on the unit sizes. but moving forward, once everybody receives their benefit, it's more typical to both the market and what's typically seen in affordable housing. >> commissioner richardson: city wide. city policies that guarantee one