the main dispute between uber and tif is full london transport, which is basically the public transport regulator in the city. however, i agree with the doctor. that we should not deal with these as a transport operator in principle, but in the definition of the market, we should not forget that these are substitute goods. the alternative is that that system also provides public transportation, which means that if something happens now, we can go and see it, for example with a campaign with an advertising program of linear taxis in tehran, they decide to halve the price , assuming that it is impossible, but it is not impossible, then it is likely that my internet will be reduced from these taxi services, or if a subway line passes near my house, which was not there before. and now if a very good metro service comes to me, the probability of me using this taxi service will decrease, that is, although i agree with mr. doctor that this is what we call police market, it is a separate market space, but the products that are substitutes for this product are in the market spaces. they are now