a tim anderson says people in australia, certainly summer concerned a conflict between the us and china could break out. it's really a terrible ha development, which is scaring a lot of people in australia, no matter what they political persuasion, because they know that china, which is non threatening to australia and which is australia's largest trading partner, has been for some time. ah, it's an impossible task. to step into a conflict with a power that big and for no real reason. and unfortunately, it's being done simply because of the dependence of successive governments in australia, on the, their role to play a supporting role to the u. s. at which the u. s. as in launched itself on to this aggression against china because of extreme jealousy at st. so unfortunately, add the pendant politics is really creating a huge dilemma in there. at the moment the china is clearly going to defend itself . it's going to defend including b. what you might call an unincorporated terror korean taiwan, which had been a stable relationship. this, that, that is called for the stable most of the pe

we heard from tim anderson, director of the center for counter hedge, a monic studies from sid me, who says the us military funded institute simply says what washington wants. the thing about i is that it is not even reveal in the meeting here in australia, and they have funded by destroyed in the military and by the u. s. military and my weapons manufacturers. and they also have tied journalists in the, in the stores use like media. and also the people that those hide journalists interview are also often paid boy sources linked to the u. s. military. and so there's, unfortunately a very strong loop here. it's just a straight propaganda channel for the u. s. military saying what the u. s. military wants. unfortunately, he has started the media to so badly compromise and doesn't recognize the conflicts of interest. but people are being fooled by that. i mean the, the abc, the, the, you're struggling to study media does not even acknowledge that the people that live interviewing with s b is funded by and destroyed in and the u. s. military. and of course, a u. s. military on these try in

we heard earlier from tim anderson direct service center, if accounts i had demonic studies from sydney. he says that the u. s. miniature funded institute simply amplifies the views of washington. the thing about e, i s p i is that it is not even reveal in the media here in australia that they have funded by you started the military and by the u. s. military and my weapons manufacturers. and i also have tied journalists in the, in the stores and slate media, and also the people that those high journalists interview are also often tied boy sources linked to the u. s. military. and so there's unfortunately a very strong loop in, it's just a straight propaganda channel for the u. s. military saying what the u. s. military once. unfortunately, you started in mid years, so badly compromise and doesn't recognize the conflicts of interest that people are being fooled by that. i mean the, the i, b, c, the, the, you're struggling to state media does not even acknowledge that the people that they're interviewing with s b is funded by and destroyed in and the u. s. military and of course, u. s. mi

it doesn't quite lend itself to be that we spoke to tim anderson, head of the sydney based center for counter hedge, a monic studies that says australia and the west at large uses human rights as a tool to intervene and other countries affairs, while not holding themselves to account very well known these systematic crimes. and when, when it comes to time for some outside scrutiny, they can't deal with it. they simply cannot deal with something that really they need to be reminded of that these are people, after all, who are preaching human rights all around the world. the foreign policy following that washington is full of these claims about human rights, but they don't want it to them. there is a general patent minutes. we're talking about a strike, but there is a general patent that, of course, the us itself does not allow the international criminal court to look at any of its actions around the world. israel is the same, but of course they use it as a tool. they use human rights these days as a tool against independent countries that they want to discipline. some of the worst form

while the director of the center, if a counter hedge, a monic studies a tim anderson says people in australia, certainly some of concerned a conflict between the u. s. and china could break out. it's really a terrible ha development, which is scaring a lot of people who stride it, no matter what they political persuasion, because they know that china, which is non threatening to australia and which is the straight as largest trading partner, has been for some time. it's an impossible task to step into a conflict with a pow that big and for no real reason. and unfortunately it's being done simply because.