lemon. it's the weakest of a cases springing up like tim's and we. others -- week. d. i hold no brief for the conduct of this president or any president. what i do care about is the future of the judiciary and whether we should be asserting an authority with such a slight and unprecedented foundation, as is continued here. >> i agree. i think that under cheney, it would make a mockery of respect, which must be considered at every stage. >> no president has done this. essentially, what you're saying, as i understand, we have an emoluments clause. that's the law. but a president can violated in inry incidents -- violate it every instance. you could have interest in dignitaries openly to come in and take 500 rooms of mar-a-lago. you can do all of these things. at the end of the day, you're saying there's nothing you can saidout a president if you -- because this is in light most favorable -- violated it in every instance. but you're saying nothing can be done. is that correct? my question is, is that correct? nothing can be done to remedy a president who openly, without a