. >> pennsylvania republican congressman tim murphy with me. you heard what the president's got to say, we're producing more than in the last eight years and he wants to expand production even more. do you buy that? >> i don't believe it. four or five years ago when i supposed to bill to drill off the coast, the atlantic, gulf and pacific, let's use that money to create jobs and rebuild our infrastructure, from that time on under speaker pelosi, she said it would take five to ten years to get to our pumps. think of the words he said during the state of the union. an all of the above energy policy. i don't know what that means unless he wants all pumps in america to be above $5 a gallon. if we're not producing oil -- by the way, they get tied up in lawsuits. we end up with huge problems when countries like iran and opec countries have political troubles. we're not a major player as much as we can. you don't drill for oil, you don't produce enough gasoline, prices go up. >> we're in a spike. there's been a surge just in the laos few days -- last

i know yesterday in opening statements my good friend tim murphy, we sit on the steel caucus together was touting the wonderful effects of jobs created in our country in the steel industry. i share that concern with tim. we work very hard to help u.s. steel manufacturers. i reached out to the permit applicant trans canada and several other sources to try to get some clarifying information on where 75% of the steel used in the keystone pipeline domestically sourced from north america would be. unfortunately the best answer i could get seems to be there's a single pipe manufacturer in little rock, arkansas, providing most of the steel for this pipeline. the trouble with that is the manufacturer doesn't actually use u.s. or north american steel to make their pipe. in fact, the little rock plant very clearly told me they make their pipe out of foreign steel. in fact, they have already imported 148 miles of ready made pipe from india. so that's sitting on their block right now. the rest of the steel from which they will make pipe is sitting there in slab in the rock comes from foreign sour

dan murphy, tim colin. >> commissioners, i'm dan murphy.ç of the eastern neighborhood c.e.c.mittees with a special focus on the east side. two weeks i was here and i raised the topic of implementation impediments and i promised to come back and given the lack of time i'm just going to focus on one and it relates directly to the plans -- if you recall, the plan is expected to produce about 10,000 housing units and depending on which document you look at up to approximately 13,000 new jobs over the life of the plan. i want to specifically talk about impediments related to job production. linda,ç can i have the overhea please? i thought it might be helpful to highlight a real life example. currently i control a 3.3 acre parcel on showplace square which is surrounded by the california collegeç of arts and it's two blocks north of the daddaga triangle, which i worked with this commission on. in august of last year it was fully approved and we expect it will be under construction here in the next few months. the concept that i'm working to call it a model early version of the ame

tim murphy served as governor romney secretary of health and human services. >> the difference has falltegories. one is how it was financed. massachusetts didn't raise a tax, use its own resources, redirect existing money to change the pay in which healthcare was financed and delivered and covered within the state. the federal law went and raised a bunch of taxes to be able to do that. so i would argue that they is a dig sant distinction -- significant distinction between the plans. massachusetts did a deregulation of insurance market to enable a number of people who buy health insurance on their own. the federal government is a big regulatory scheme they have now put in place across the state. in some ways the most breathtaking urseption of what has been the state regulatory authority and bring to washington. we didn't touch anything on that in massachusetts. we liberated the insurance companies to have more creative consumer directed plans. i think that is a significant distinction between the plans. so, in those regards, regulatory and financing, they are fundamental very, very diffe