tend to have a negative economic dynamism which translates into low growth for many years and timothy geitner said it's an excellent study although in some ways understates the risks so here are guys setting economic policy they have a whole team of hundreds of economists that work at the treasury why did he ever even think to look at the data and test it himself because they wanted this outcome anyway this is they fit the facts around what they wanted. ideologically right well there's a double tragedy at play here because of course people like paul krugman and the money printers will say you see steroids bad we need to print lots of money but of course they have an academic agenda as well they're not paul krugman doesn't have a real job the summer had a real job he doesn't having experience in the market or finance he has an ideological objective as well he'll use this to make errors on the other side of the debate by over stimulating by flooding the economy with money and has even milton friedman said there's no connection between monetary policy deployment but of course with a site that ev

tend to have a negative economic dynamism which translates into low growth for many years and timothy geitner said it's an excellent study although in some ways understates the risks so here are guys setting economic policy they have a whole team of hundreds of economists that work at the treasury why didn't he ever even think to look at the data and test it himself because they wanted this outcome anyway this is they fit the facts around what they wanted. ideologically right well there's a double tragedy at play here because of course people like paul krugman and the money printers will say you see steroids bad we need to print lots of money but of course they have an academic agenda as well they're not paul krugman doesn't have a real job he's summer had a real job he doesn't have anything experience in the market or finance he has an ideological objective as well he'll use this to make errors on the other side of the debate by over stimulating by flooding the economy with money and as even milton friedman said there's no connection between monetary policy to employment but of course with a

tend to have a negative economic dynamism which translates into low growth for many years and timothy geitner said it's an excellent study although in some ways understates the risks so here are guys setting economic policy they have a whole team of hundreds of economists that work at the treasury why didn't he ever even think to look at the data and test it himself because they wanted this outcome anyway this is they fit the facts around what they wanted i. ideologically right well there's a double tragedy at play here because of course people like paul krugman and the money printers will say you see steroids bad we need to print lots of money but of course they have an academic agenda as well they're not paul krugman doesn't have a real job he's summer had a real job he doesn't have anything experience in the market or finance he has an ideological objective as well he'll use this to make errors on the other side of the debate by over stimulating by flooding the economy with money and as even milton friedman said there's no connection between monetary policy to employment but of course with