>> tina tam for the planning department once again. yes, the buildings will not touch the sufficient side of the buildings from the south. there is any evident that would demonstrate there will be material impairment to these adjacent buildings to where they wouldn't be considered resources any more. >> and that's what i had the understanding, that the standard is that it would make those adjacent buildings, one or both of them, no longer potential historic resources. is that right? >> that is correct. >> okay. and it's the department's view that this vertical addition would not cause the two surrounding -- two adjacent properties to be converted into non-potential historic resources? >> tina tam for the planning department once again. yes. the adjacent buildings that move forward if they want to be survived and consider them historic resource doesn't affect other resource without assessing what is going on at 61 1 buena vista west because there is no impact, direct impact or indirect impact to those building's eligibility for left on

my name is tina tam, i'm a senior preservation planner for the san francisco planning department.espite the issues and concerns raised by the appellant in both the appeal letter dated february the 22nd and in the letter submitted today, the planning department still believes that the proposed project meets the requirement of c-e-q-a guidelines and will not have a significant impact to historic resources or to the public views, privacy and shadow. the proposed project is appropriately exempt from further environmental review. during discretionary review hearing on september 6, 2012, the planning commission requested additional three feet for a total of 5 feet setback from the front building wall. this condition was crafted to allow greater visibility of the corner turret of the adjacent building to the south at 601 buena vista west. while this is a condition of approval for the building permit, it was not a c-e-q-a mitigation to address for any impacts to nearby historic or visual resources. the subject building does not now nor will it after the proposed addition is constructed to

tam, slam, thank you, ma'am. next up, tina.h, hey, tina, little tip: you're a super fast talker, so talk really slow. thanks, tammy. whoa! that's still way too fast. mr. grant, i'm here because i have a nose for news. great. now about that green jacket... i'm tina with... (whispers): tina. ...with... the... (screams) paranormal activity! (screams) oh, my god, i'm anchor! yes! yes! ♪ yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah ♪ (sings guitar riff) whoo! i am anchor! i'm staff intern? but i already had a sign-off. "good-bye, audience." well, maybe you could change it to "does anyone need juice?" does anyone need juice? hmm. maybe it'll work better when you have some juice. ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] a truly unlimited life needs truly unlimited data from sprint. and now, get $100 off samsung galaxy phones at sprint stores and sprint.com. only three dollars? crazy! [ male announcer ] yeah, crazy awesome. the oven roasted chicken $3 six-inch select, try it with melty cheese or banana peppers, still $3! now that's a great deal! subway. eat fresh. change! we