bob beck with tjpa. tjpa will be responsible for the administration and maintenance of the park. we will be contacting for those services. we have also had conversations with recreation and park about potentially participating in that in some form, but in terms of the funding for the maintenance of the park, we are looking at a number of strategies. there is a cbd that has been developed in rincon hill. the redevelopment agency is having conversations with them about expanding that to encompass the redevelopment zone and potentially even extending it as far center or r settingcbd that is more focused -- setting up a separate cbd. -- setting up a separate cbd. in terms of the total operation,

in terms of high school students, we are starting to have summer interns report to tjpa, program management team, turner, and web core. a total of 11 interns' this summer. it withey also met with city college, and representatives of the san francisco unified. they are having a follow-up with city college on the teaching facilities and instructor resources there, as well as sfpuc will have a list of items for their program and john o'connell that contractors may be able to help meet with materials or supplies. in terms of veterans, i degree of mentioned before, we will have -- we will be participating in our reach date of the uss hornet. this is a big event that is scheduled to help us. webcore has been talking to travis air force base about engaging in the transition program, which is the process that discharging veterans go through as they leave this service. it is a multi-day session preparing the chance for transition out of the service and engaging in that process to inform them about trades and how to sign up for the various trade union. we have also discussed that with the trade union

. >> i am outside counsel for the tjpa. good morning. this is a contract to extend the time of performance for appraisal services. it does not involve an appropriation of any additional money. the appraiser is providing ongoing consultation of this to attempt to settle and require right of way for the project and to appraise parties such as a portion of the 201 mission property, to complete the assemblage of part 5 for development. and potentially deposition and trial testimony for those cases that were unable to settle. chair kim: thank you. i see that this is a contract extension for an additional three months, and carneghi has completed 60% of the contract amount. do we expect that they will wind down the remaining -- am i speaking on the wrong item? >> no, it is five years. chair kim: i think i misread that. >> the previous amendment was for three months. chair kim: ok. i am serri, the first amendment. my apologies. the second amendment is for an additional three years? >> five years. chair kim: 5 years. 3, with the option to extend

our partner agencies at tjpa and the former redevelopment agency. this concludes my presentation on the matter, and unless commissioners have questions, and suggest you consider certification. commissioner fong: thank you. commissioner antonini: thank you for your presentation. there were a couple of questions asked about revisions to the draft. it talks about some changes -- for example, the ratio of commercial to residential hotel changes from 3 to 1 to two to one, which would be less of an impact for the same and that, and they talk about the shorter building than was originally proposed and loading dock changes and a variety of other things. it would seem like that answers the question that was raised earlier, and then the other question was raised. i know you had mentioned talking about section 295 as we analyze each building for collectively the impact of all the buildings, and it would seem like all the alternatives are in there. there was one comment made about every possible project that could be analyzed has to be in complete conformity wi

answer your question more particularly, we looked very carefully at the word that we have done for the tjpa in terms of land values and property values, and this study parallels the kinds of premiums we have been anticipating as part of the residential and office premiums that have been assumed in the prior work that we have done. and the other part of the that we did is we looked at, for example, the millers -- melarus community, and there are special taxes that would be levied in would be compared to our value adjustments to the marginal increase anticipated as part of that word. again, it is within those ranges. the would say that the mechanisms of the melarus special tax, as well as the land of value capture and the ultimate build out of the new development and the property tax increment that would be generated are actually really reflecting these enhanced values. >> ok, so there's not more than we thought? >> to be clear, the reason i said and beyond is because it went beyond the properties that we were looking at, that we're not in control of. so we were showing what was happening wit