they regulate tnc. they put out a router in april the underlying finding is the overall effect of tncs on bmt is ambiguous and additional studies are necessary. that is the latest literature available to date. >> i don't want to take too much time. i am struggling to understand how the impact of the vehicle of additional checks coming to a neighborhood and emitting, you know, the toxic chemicals and how they impact air quality is studied under sequa. what i hear is because it is the metric you use is based on population, not based on reality of commuting patterns and the type of transportation that is actually used in the city that we really don't know. we don't know. i guess, okay, my final question is understanding the impact requireds or the method you use? does my question make sense? >> it does. it requires that we study the environmental effects based on substantial evidence. what we are seeing we do not have substantial evidence to support that tncs are having a significant impact on the emt. >>

recognize that tncs may increase bmt.there is not enough data right now to be able to analyze the impacts of plan or specific project increase in tnc use and increase in bmt. the e.i.r. made a good faith effort to disclose that tncs could increase the bmt but in terms of the threshold that is whether or not it reduce us the levels to 10% below 2005 regional averages and as liz mentioned in her presentation the impact would be well below those thresholds. >> many members of the public have spoken about the jobs housing and balance within the central soma plan. it is important to reiterate to look at it from city wide perspective not within the central soma plan. this is downtown area and we are going to have a jobs imbalance. it is correct four the members of the public to say there will be pressure to build more house you go to make up. we should be building more housing, affordable house you go to mitigate the impacts of increased jobs within this plan. what is the response to planning in terms of studying a higher housi

you're a tentative, nonconfirmation, a tnc, that tells the employer there is something wrong here than that is on the employee to go deal with the social security administration, deal with the federal agencies responsible for clearing up their record to clear up whatever discrepancy there is so they can be approved. or if they are using stolen identification, and many cases, that person goes to another company or if we're talking about unscrupulous employers, they will find another identification for that person to use. host: from kentucky, ron, go ahead. caller: i have used e-verify for years and i wanted to bring out a couple of points. blamed e-verify for the incident but if theed, employer had used a valid drivers license which has a photo id and makes sure that person was who it said it was on the valid drivers license, you cannot blame e-verify when the couldoyed -- employer of been able to make sure the person in the drivers license valid id photo matched up with the person sitting in front of them. that was one thing. i am not sure how we tied in tidbits of the tragic death int

you could get up tnc 3s locally. i think it's more like 1 to 2.erate rain through manassas, even up to frederick. this is monday, tuesday. areas of moderate possible. we couldave a few thunderstorms in the mix. for the d.c. metro, we're looking at showers and coastal flooding and that's theame dealor our friends in southern maryland. anybody ong the potomac river. that where we see coastal flooding from now until tuesday. by the time we get toes wey, thursday, friday, it's so nice. temperatures are going to be in the midos0s for the part. next chance of rain saturday. that's the first day of fall.e we have m news right after this. . i put criminals in prison during the day i'm jennifer wexton, and as a prosecutor, and changed diapers at night. later, when i had a law practice, i volunteered to help moms collect child support. then, as state senator, i worked across party lines to target sexual offenders and take guns away from domestic abusers. in congress, i'll stand up to president trump. i approve this message because, like every working mom, w

tnc, i'll say that. people can use their imaginations for it. >> or google it. >> yes, i don't want to be banned on msnbc going potty mouth. i think they're in a position to champion women's causes. they have the story line working in their favor at this point. to your point, carol, i think it's interesting how the president has reacted. he's stunned the people in the white house and his aides when he came out and said her story deserves to be told. which says something where we are politically. >> but they know the risk that if they don't like they're even willing to hear, that would be a huge risk. >> and there's risk on both sides of overdoing it. and it goes for the democrats, too. and if you look at the white house, though, what they're saying and what they're doing to kavanaugh it's almost the way they spin -- you know, you'll hear sarah sanders say, well, the president said this. >> you know when they're distancing. >> and they're really leaning on him and his situation. the poll, you know, the an

i am still not satisfied on the response around the impact of tncs on any of the decisions that come before us. i don't think that we have sufficient data and we can't discuss this issue, it is sufficient for me. it doesn't cut it. if we are looking for substantial evidence of impact on air quality, then probably a per population measure is not right to do that. clearly more people are going to result in more vehicle miles traveled. if that is the ratio that we are constantly looking at, there would never be a significant impact on air quality. that is not the case that is not what is happening in san francisco. i serve on the air quality management district, and thi ths an area of concern for the district because of the air pollution in the neighborhood. you i think there is data out there. i think we can't hide behind should method that we used in the path to determine impact on air quality we need new methods that show what the impact on the air quality is. i am going to be pushing for that more in the future. i would like to see a different analysis out you have the planning depa