what did tndc get? they got a subpoena for all their records. that's why they are not here and for the planning commission. the planning commission was told that but somehow it escapes their attention. they were told to let go. this lawyer keeps writing back and completely unresponsive. the size, it is certainly over 5,000 square feet. the way condos and coop's including the deck belonging to that 1 unit. >> thank you, would the variance holder care to speak under rebuttal? okay, there is three 3 minutes for the zoning administrator. >> thank you scott sanchez planning department. i will be brief. first there were no valid ceqa or conditional use operations. it was unanimously approved by the planning commission. there have been substantial changes made over time. the planning commission did deny this project twice before approving it. in regards to mr. fung's question about whether or not we received code compliance, in regards to the department's design goals we would prefer to have the department in the corners here and require at least a rea

tndc wants to buy it's and the mayor's office says that all cities should consider low income housing. >> okay. we can hear from the variance holder now. is anyone here speaking on behalf of the variance holder? >> good evening. i am the principal in pacific properties. council for the methodist church. the zoning administrator is going to defend the decision tonight. i don't think they have anything to add to that. i would just make a couple corrections. also the art project director is here. there is no 5,000 square foot penthouse. i don't know what she's talking about. there are a lot of disparate comments. if there is something bothering you, i can correct the facts if you have specific questions, otherwise i would prefer to have the zoning administrator explain to you his decision. >> good evening members. i'm gordon, the attorney for nevada state. we have owned the property since 2010. the zoning administrator granted three variances and this is an appeal of those variances. the appellant has said she's only appealing two of them if you read the appeal. three things i would like

. >> we have brian from the neighborhood tndc and today davis from parent pack and other groups and a few others that i have mentioned we are going to close public comment in a moment. >> thank you, my name is margaret fisher with the department of public health. i came this morning in my scrubs because i came directly from a screening of our preschoolers in our state subjectssidized preschools. many children have experienced decay. some low income families are especially susceptible. so 39 percent of our state is subsidized children of preschool already have decay. soda consumption nearly doubles the risk and increases likelihood in adults. the cost of sugar based drinks, the cost of sugar and dental decay is a cost. the cost for 3-year-old is about $10,000. by seeing children earlier preventative dental services saves money. safety net dental clinics like the dph dental services provide critical preventative treatment. unfortunately access to a preventative dental treatment continue to be a major obstacle to having healthy teeth. i include nutritional guidance. clinics are under sta