so, what am i going to do? they ended up -- i said, do not paint over it. it's got to be power washed. you have to use -- that can be really expensive. they went and painted over it. and now it looks worse than the graffiti. i see it all over the city that a tag is painted over with brown paint, with whatever is available. and then it becomes a real problem because it's really hard to remove it then. so, i think that -- my thought about it, i know dpw doesn't have the financial resources, but realistically i think sidewalks even though they're kind of that nebulous gray area where technically they're owned by the property owner, but they really are public property. and i think that's something that dpw should somehow find the funding to take care of that property because private property owners are not going to hire somebody with a power washer to come out there and do it. i just know it. i mean, i see very, very few examples of that. >> larry. >> i would agree. but as always, it's an issue of funding. we do have approved product listses on our website. so,

you tell them in the materials what to do, how to speak up? >> we do. that is thanks again to the advisors and worked with stephanie who is one of the folks instrumental in crafting the stop bullying. goff program and at the time we started it was the only program i could find with longitudinal research that demonstrated efficacy and we offer kids tactics they could use and one is who is the trusted adult? one is -- i'm not -- i'm preaching to the choir here. one is when the bullying is over and go up to the kids targetd and say "nice jacket". you don't have to say "sit with me at lunch" but do some gesture and if you can say "i'm sorry that happened to you" and if you are comfortable enough during the bullying and say "this is not what we do here and take the target and walk away with them and we crafted the program with those in schools and we were gratified. to a point that cape up earlier and research this spring and the thing that hit me and we launched in 2010 so we're going on the third school year with this material and i had this horrible feelin

he was going to do everything that he can and it is great to see the commissioners here aboard. and i think that commissioner walker, pointed out very important, when we are talking about it earlier, as commissioners we have strong ties into the different communities. we need to get people's support here. not everybody is going to be happy with every aspect of this but we have to do the right thing for the city and as san franciscoan and so we look forward to working with you pat and micca i want to acknowledge you down there who is hidden in the back and the number two man there to do everything, and he needs support to get this to the necessary time frame that you need it done and the thanks to corn field for all of his work on this and everybody involved. so with that i would second commissioner walker's motion. >> all the count. >> we have the motion and a second. a roll call vote? >> president mccarthy? >> aye. >> mar? >> yes. >> commissioner clinch? >> yes. >> commissioner lee. >> yes. >> commissioner melgar. >> yes. >> and commissioner walker. >> yes. >> and the motion ca

you've got to maintain them. these houses do not maintain themselves. and much of the work that we see coming in for small permit work in the department of building inspection are things that are related to maintenance. people want to rebuild a deck or they need to fix the bathroom and put new materials and tile and so on and a lot of that work is work that could be -- extend the life of what you have if it had been properly maintained. not to say we don't like you to do bork in your homes, we -- to do work in your homes, but maintenance will help home repair. i have some slides here. let's take a quick peak here -- peek here. we'll look at the outside buildings first and inside buildings next. outside buildings are typical maintenance issues. a whole plethora of maintenance issues. the siding, the windows, the doors, the stairs, the sidewalk, the landscape. so let's just look at a couple different kinds of buildings and the typical problems they might have. so, for example, here's a building with final siding. what kind of maintenance do we need with th

not everybody wants to do that. we have to make it -- again, obama is doing a great way -- they have people crying up there and babies and women, they are all going to do -- to die because we cut 14 cents. we have to do it more on a emotional level to get people to want to understand what is going on. >> there is a way to do it. i feel a little bit of hope. i think the sequestration has been fantastic in terms of narrowing down this discussion and focusing. the white house tours question was brilliant. the obama administration walked into it. earlier this week, representative andy harris, a doctor from maryland -- [applause] >> right? i just moved here and i'm from california. i feel right at home in maryland. you have to watch out. he was on the appropriation committee and he had the president of the disease control center in front of him. you sent out this pamphlet and you're cutting because of the sequestration and 250,000 children in maryland would go without immunization and i have the obama budget in front of m

and the volcker rule needs to be fixed. >> do they need to be fixed or used? thought both dodd frank and volcker had pretty well put into place the tools that regulators need. >> well, i think they do too. you know, the statute could have been more prescriptive. instead, it delegated authority to the regulators to fix it, and the regulators wanted it that way. the fed and treasury didn't want a lot of prescriptive rules in the statute itself. they wanted the authority to do it themselves. they got what they wanted, but the record has not been as good as it should be. the volcker rule is still not finalized. what's been proposed is very weak. it needs to be strengthened. what's been put out there is pretty weak. >> so for the stranger who came to me in the dallas airport where i was reading this book and looked at it and said, you know, i don't understand it. i don't even know why i should care. >> yeah, he should care, or she. >> why? >> well, look, when this crisis hit, first of all, there were a lot of bad loans made by large institutions that should have kno

going to do their best to deal with it at station level. but it's just not something that's reported on the internet or counter reports or patrol officers. >> just to follow-up what marty talked about. unless there is a report, we're not going to know about it. we're not going to be able to address that issue. in terms of graffiti on concrete, the majority of the ones i've seen so far have been along the lines of the stencil graffiti. those create a little bit more of a challenge for us in terms of prosecution. it is definitely something marty and i stay in contact about. everything is coming up. there's always changes. so, it is something we're trying to address as it's coming up. >> i'll add one thing to that, too. the stencils that are going on the sidewalks, and if they have permission by the property owner to do them. we have goldfish all up and down haight street. but permission by the property owners. so, that goes into it also. >> there will be a yellow brick road somewhere, too. we're going to go -- do you want to respond to this?

so you can see it's a very stringent requirement when you are looking for people to do what you want to have done. this is particularly important when you are initially deciding who wants to be a police officer, we want to get them through the academy, get them through probation and make them successful officers. but it's just as important when becoming a member of a specialty unit. the iplt is really big. there are probably people in this room saying i got graffiti when somebody else wanted it, and that's hard. and there's people like me and the officers i have hired into my units that just love the job and see the value in it, see the value for the community. so you've got to have that interest or else, again, you are going to have not as successful an officer. now you found the officer, you got him figured out, i talk a lot about officers but the same applies to civilians, anybody sitting out in this audience. because my concept is anybody can be a graffiti expert and a lot of that comes down to training. where do you find this training? first it's police officers, we get a lot of

i said, this is what i want to do. i wanted to compile everything that i can get off of facebook, everything that i can get off of the graffiti tracker program and try to nail the subject with the graffiti that they've done just by using those two things basically. let's try it. first guy we did was ultra here. he didn't have a lot. it was more for these slap tags. but he did about 125 incidences in the city of phoenix. not a big one, but it's just enough to start me out to try to get something. he was an adult and he served 36 days in jail doing city. i didn't get enough to get a felony count on that, but that was my first attempt at getting a felony. i heard some people in here, san francisco, $450 is the damage limit for a felony, 400? phoenix or arizona it's a thousand. okay. it used to be 250 years ago and they moved it up to a thousand. so, it's a little bit harder for us to get -- if i got him down to $97 0 in damage, i almost got him. [laughter] >> but this is the way we started, though. ultra was my very first

that's what we set out to do, so we defined our mission what we wanted to do. anything that didn't pertain to that was sort of superfluous. the we defined our mission, and then we cleaned up the organization. gm had a matrix management group, which meant a person or individual had several bosses. we fixed that because when you have several bosses, you really don't have a boss at all. so we sort of streamlined the management and maybe more direct line reporting. that was very important. we organize, had an organization chart one could understand. we streamlined, we preached design build and sell to everybody in that company from the very start. we spent a lot of time on the us and the plant. i did, the senior management it. and i think the most important thing is we made people responsible for the job. and we gave him the authority to do it and we held them accountable. and only then did we start to make her progress, but that didn't take long. that was really key. >> host: basin your experiences there in talking to employees and to the management team, how was i

>> the message is you're not going to do much to solving our financial problems with the debt, until you deal, make some adjustments -- no one is talking about doing away with social security, medicaid or medicare, until some adjustments are made and accepting that 70 is the new 30 in this country with the actuarial tables. until they come to grips with that, the rest is smoke and mirrors. >> just to back up this concern, look at this right now, medicare and medicaid are 5% of the g.d.p., of the overall competent. they're growing 10%, 9.6% by 2037. this is a reality. we're skipping it. how are we going to deal with the debt problem if we skip the main causes of it? >> american doesn't have a deficit problem. it has a health care problem. it has to face the reality that you raise revenue by something like 30% in order to pay for the social contract as it exists today for retirees and retirees, present or future, richer or poorer are going to have their services slashed or the final thing you can do. you can try to bring down health care costs. half of the rise of american health care s

the answer can't be to do nothing. so as police officers here in san francisco there is a myriad of options that officers go through whether it's 51/50 where people are danger to themselves or to others, door alleys, i know there are some mental health professionals who work closely with our program. we are trying not to get folks into custody. dr. mcglaegen, when we like restaurants, it's no fun arresting a drunk. there is a huge range. but again, with the city of san francisco, you have to do something. when you have people that is certain unimaginable. they can't make the call. they would help themselves if they could but they can't. so in talking about the san diego sip program which i know our mayor is in favor of and we are going to try to do it in this city and we have talked to them about the work they do with dr. mcglaegen, if we can get it going and have them stop this. if you can't, you get 30 days, but you have to pick it or it gets picked for you if you can't pick. on the high side, jail is not something we

i am very cognizant of what we have to do. and it's not easy to do. it does take investment. it does take a lot of talk with funding associations. it does take prioritization. as often my agencies tell me, when the budget time comes up. we have to prioritize this. we know the budget games we have to play to balance it out. it all comes together with this very important topic with our transitional age youth. we are very willing in our city to prioritize ourselves, and make sure we don't keep the generations of kids going with the same type of habits. that's why in addition to these programs we authored ipo, interrupt predictive analysis and organizing effort to deal with public safety issues involving our youth. we have to do more to interrupt those patterns out there. we have to do more to use data to predict and analyze where the high-crime rates are to get people in a safe environment. once they are there, we have to be consistent with continuum of support to give and support people transition out of those dangerous habits and not go back. this will take a lot of time and a

we had to do it and do it well to make that happen. >> rose: do you, once you get to the court, and you're sitting on the court and you get to play the role of a swing justice. >> now, i don't watch -- >> rose: you do. >> i do not. i mean it sounds like you don't care what it is, you're just swinging away. >> rose: you don't like that at all. sounds like the person you're there for sometimes rules with the conservative and sometimes rules with the liberals and whatever decision she makes will be the determining factor in te decision of the court on that particular case. it gives you immense power and you knew you had it. >> setimes. >> rose: and you cared to exercise it. >> sometimes that's correct. the court was divided in such a way that a single vote could turn it from an affirm to a reverse. and i found myself in that situation. >> rose: why, just because you saw both sides of many cases. >> i don't know. i mean any other justice could say the same as i. they could say i could change my vote. >> rose: but they pretty much voted in a certain way and you would go from left to right. >> n

to do his homework. i'm gonna show you what to say specifically, and i'm gonna show you what to do about that and it'll all be geared toward getting that kid to take responsibility for himself. we want to stop-- i want to stop the fighting in your house. i want to stop the yelling i want to stop the screaming. i'm gonna show you how to stop that stuff and to start a program where kids are taking more responsibility and solving their own problems appropriately. you're gonna be the person who helps them solve their problem. you're not gonna be the person that takes that problem on your shoulders and then you have to live with it. it's their job to learn how to solve problems. i'm gonna show you exactly how to get them to do that. you know, the parents that i work with find the total transformation program to be a very exciting experience for them because they stop asking themselves, "what am i doing wrong?" you know, a lot of parents blame themselves or blame each other-- it can have a lot of pressure on a

you going to do that, that's cool. y to tell me that i'm dishonorable because i choose not to do it anymore. >> being interviewed, as you are now, video and whatnot, is that going to have an effect on your safety? >> my safety is pretty much -- it wouldn't have any other effect than it already does. you know, you're going to get got in any way. and any way they can get you, they're going to get you. now, whether i do this or not, it doesn't matter. you know, so -- and it's my choice. and i look at it like this. i mean, everyone's got to go sometime. if that does happen. so i'm not really sweating it. >> the fact that he chose to debrief is going to give us a wealth of information that is going to benefit us, not only in this facility but throughout the state. the eme has their hands in every institution as well as various neighborhoods out in the streets. by him coming forward, actually he's putting his life and safety in jeopardy. but he's well aware of that. this is a good, good debrief. >> it's sny for you? >> oh, ye

and that was one opportunity that we were able to do that. quick net also participated with us, allowed us to be able to have civil social interaction with the military and have us be able to interchange with them and knowing what type of response we had. intelligence carry on program and deployable joint command and control are two of the systems that were used by the military to collect information and organize it appropriately so that we were able to respond and interact with the civilian agencies. so for the take aways, it provided us an opportunity for real exchange and interaction. the military has a lot of capability and sometimes we don't always know how best to modify that in an appropriate response and being able to get together and practice the situation allowed us to understand each other better. the lessons learned: throughout the exercise a lot of lessons learned were gains and we're taking those lessons and applying them to real processes where we have interchange and response. 18 months of planning allowed us certain benefits a

do. you can divide people into teams. next year everyone is going to want to do it again. suddenly a kid is showing grandpa's something on their devices. you are making those bonds. the research shows all families have conflicts. you want to limit and control that conflict. spend less time worrying about what you do wrong, more time focusing on what you do right. if you make a positive memories, they will outweigh the negatives. ,avis: i want to ask a question the thesis of which are do not believe myself. what does it say to us but we are decision making and family values used to be organic? to be convinced those things matter we have to rely upon research? if i could say, the research shows, i am sure it does. what does it say the families have to be convinced it is the right thing to do. they say research says. >> they have been through a big since you and i were being switched occasionally. three things. one is the definition of the family has changed. you have nuclear families. you have divorced families. you have single families. the nature of family change. #2, women

they're not going to do this. the shooters in tucson, aurora, n newtown, they're not going to be checked. they're unrecognizable. nra supported the national instant check system on dealers. we're a billion -- >> that was a reference to 1999 when you testified -- >> yeah, we've a billion dollars into the system now. it's not fair. it's not accurate. it's not ins stant. the mental health records are not in the system and they don't prosecute any of the criminals that they catch. it's a speedbump for the law abiding. it slows down the law abiding and does nothing to anybody else. >> but why not try to create a system where you could have a better opportunity to trace a gun that was used in a crime even if it's not 100%? you use such incendiary language, the idea a federal registry which does not exist today on legal gun owners even though dick's sporting goods and others participate in this. we've been trying for 20 years and the nra is up on the hill trying to get this existing system on retail stores. here is what t

and for you not to even do the electrical inspection or the dbi to go through, which we all do to get permits, to me it sounds like you stick your thumb up to what we are trying to enforce here. i mean we tried to give you an opportunity to comply, and it takes this long for you to do these things and you still are not in compliance. so, you know, we always want to give the applicant the benefit of the doubt and give the opportunity. but it also reflects on the owner. are you going to be responsible? and this kind of out reach, offering free stuff to your neighbors is not what we are asking for. you should tell them, what you plan to do. i am planning to open until 3:00. so maybe that changes their mind. so, i am just saying, you know, for me, as a responsible owner, we are supposed to be doing the right thing and there is always some leeway or some things that slip through the cracks, but this is pretty big for me. >> i think that... what the commissioners are trying to say is that it is really hard to trick the commission. many of us are in the business, and we kind of have seen it

. >> and jason mattera, wanted to ask you a quick question. do you think it's becoming of the president to be constantlily attacking fox news and rush limbaugh? >> i don't think that's what he's doing. >> no? >> no, don't you read his interviews? he whines about fox news and rush, and don't you think it's childish to be going after a news network and a radio host. >> i'm sorry, this is an event-- >> i don't think that's what he's doing. >> you don't think he's attacking fox news. >> he's answering the question he was asked. >> sean: why is the people's house closed? that's right you have to donate $500,000, pretty unbelievable and he said it with a straight face. that's all the time. a special programming note tomorrow night on "hannity," live studio audience edition, a great show for you tomorrow might. thanks for being with us. greta is next, we'll see you tomorrow. >> greta: tonight, congressman paul ryan is here fresh off a partyline budget victory in the house of representatives. >> every family in america must balance their budget and balan

i'm going to be proud i did it. do it to the best of my ability and make sure as many people as possible hear it. at least when i turn that corner, i felt good about it and like i was doing the right thing. i went down the path and never looked back. >> let's go to the recording. this is may 17th. this is when it all started. romney comes into the room. you have the camera set up. let's play this. >> i guess everybody here is a dignitary. i appreciate your help. by the way, i am serious about the food. don't slow down. clear the place. hillary has to eat her beets. >> what's happening here? >> he had only been in the room for maybe a minute or two. i think it was telling for me, he had basically walked into a dinner party that he was the guest of honor and he demanded that the service be sped up. he literally had just walked in the door. i thought that was kind of remarkable. anybody that walks into a dinner party, doesn't matter who you are, i can't imagine demanding being fed faster. it's not like we were behind sche

is very expensive to do that. the demand letter is a requirment for the state -- is a requirement for the state laws to be brought. for civil rights cases, you are expected to know the law and be in compliance. they do not make a demand under federal law saying they should ask you for damages. and the damages could be substantial. the damages are based on the number of barriers encountered by the person when they're going to inspect the premises. these people will come and visit your business barack, three, or four times. they will sit at the counter if you have a counter. they will sit at a table. that are well aware of what the legal requirements are of the height of the table and the length of the legs, whether the bathroom is compliance, whether there is appropriate sign it. the first barrier is access to the premises itself. adding is? . -- adding steps. having a ramp that is too steep is an access issue. there are ways to deal with those. having a power door or something of that nature. of power door -- you h

they are obviously making effort to do so. their business is highly impacted by not being able to provide acoustic musician and music right now. and the public also which they have nurtured as well as all of the artists. there is a need and demand, i don't know if you are familiar with this, but, jazz does not get very much write up in this city of san francisco. you don't see it very often. in our newspapers. this gentleman standing in front of you is 87 years old. he has been performing in this area for 60 years. do you find his name in the newspaper? >> no. robert and rory have been able to interact with oueditors in the area and they do get press and public out to read about people that they are presenting, and not only people who are already know, but also people who were still here doing their craft, and continuing to. so, again, i want to just say that we are here to support them, we understand that the residents have concerns too, but we do believe that they will be able to fulfill those and it would be good for them to

you have to do a calculation. you can have as few as 20 or 25 employees, but you have to have this in a careful way. if you have 50 employers, you have to have coverage. a lot of mom-and-pop shops in donut shops and hamburger joints another critical point is they have to offer full-time coverage to a full-time employee. how is a full-time employee to find? and employee that works on average 30 hours per week per month. you work a lot more than 30 hours a week. it is. the incentive was that if we lower it to 30 hours a week, more people will be given coverage. thirty hours is a pretty low standard. most employers, they have to make a decision. what about the unintended consequences of part-time workers in this country working 20 hours a week, lower reaches and no benefits? i have talked to several cabdrivers and restaurant workers and when i walk into a retail store, i think, how many hours a week do you work. i'm a health policy geek. so what does that coverage have to look like? standards of affordability as to wh

that's basically what you have to do. you have to maintain the north side of your house. >> so, what do you use to remove mold and mildew? people say bleach kills mildew. also, when you paint and when this gets repainted, there's a very simple additive you can get at the paint store, the mildew side that prevents the development of mildew and wherever you paint. do you use mildew sides in paints? >> we mix it in with primer. >> especially good for bathrooms? ok, good. we're going to look a little more at inside bathrooms. scrubbing it off, definitely. here's a hinge, an exterior hinge. it looks like it is rusting in certain areas of the hinge which are not designed for weather exposure. exterior metal is a serious, serious problem. here's a hinge which is solid stainless steel. so stainless steel or brass or bronze or, you know, other similar materials which are designed to be exposed to weather are what you have to use for exterior. if you use anything that has galvanized or other it will -- unless -- thank you, unless it

go in -- first thing you need to do is always try to get in the easiest way. what do you want to use to force entry? you can use axs, you are use pry bars or jacks, car jacks. you need to do a lift, you don't have any levers, there's some cars parked outside, you go up and ask the owner of the car, is it okay if i use your car jack? because you're not going to break in, are you? there's always cutting and boring. here is that ax. of course striking and hammering. how do you break glass? at the top, good. we're going to say that this is the glass from here on down, so how would you break it? do i just want to take it like this and smash it this way? no. the end of the board, going to use the end of the board, but i'm also going to remember that the glass can hurt me. if i were to hit it like this, the glass could slide down, cut my hand. so you want to start at the top like he said, hold this down, turn your head away, you start at the top and smash the glass this way down like that. if it does slide down, it's going to go away from you and not towards your hand

they had nothing to do with that. set that the video was used as an excuse and it wasn't true. you have won't find the answer to that with the 32 people. >> andrea: they're afraid that they might say what ambassador's diary said. we asked for help, not just the day but the months that led up to that. i thought the answer was ridiculous. i don't comment on the president's meetings when they asked him, james rosen asked about elsewhere or anywhere? you won't comment? we should hear from them. i don't think it's weird we haven't. it's odd that access by lawmakers to get to them has been stymied. that is a strange thing. why can't members get access to these victims? >> bob: touch on what you mentioned about the e-mails. not one of them has surfaced. so until we see an official e-mail, you are playing around with a story with no basis. >> eric: greg? >> greg: i kind -- i don't know. i'm so not a fan of attacking stuff. i don't care who it happens to. it scares the heck out of me. i have so many e-mails i'm scared of. dabs

you want to take my liberty, you've got to do it right, if you don't acquit. the 5th amendment to the united states constitution guarantees it. as i have made my objection throughout this trial to make sure this kid gets a fair trial. it's not a big case is what they say. they are saying it. they have the gaul to say this is not a big case. there are few consequences. this boy will become a convicted fell on. that's the reality of it. that's what this case represents. thank you. >> >> i have been advised -- the superior court, we the jury find the defendant not guilty. this 2nd day of november 2011. count 1. >> my goal is to fill this wall up and once i fill this wall up, i won't know what else to do. i decided the wall -- i don't have any tattoos. i'm going to get the last name of every case i lost. hopefully i won't fill my back up. since this is going on the wall, i feel it has to go on my back. >> when you work as a public defender, you saved somebody and they are like what does that mean? i defend people who are charged with people committing crime. they s

> > the first thing to do is, the night before, think about the two things that you want to get done the next day before you do anything else. what is in the critical path of your success for that day? > the most important things or the most challenging things? > > things that are going to be critical to your business the next day. and you have to do those two things before you turn on your e-mail, your voicemail, and your social media feeds, because, i have to tell you, we live in an interruption- based culture, and those things just get in the way. > all right, so, i have identified the two things i need to do. then what? > > you do those things to the fullest, and then you can start looking at your list. but at the end of the day, don't carry your list from day to day. the next day, after you get those two things, what is in your mind that you actually need to do? because then you are just a slave to your list, and those things really aren't important if they stay in your list day after day after day. > so you are sort of dividing the day into sections and then matching each sectio

not everybody wants to do that. we have to make it -- again, obama is doing a great way -- they have people crying up there and babies and women, they are all going to do -- to die because we cut 14 cents. we have to do it more on a emotional level to get people to want to understand what is going on. >> there is a way to do it. i feel a little bit of hope. i think the sequestration has been fantastic in terms of narrowing down this discussion and focusing. the white house tours question was brilliant. the obama administration walked into it. earlier this week, representative andy harris, a doctor from maryland -- [applause] >> right? i just moved here and i'm from california. i feel right at home in maryland. you have to watch out. he was on the appropriation committee and he had the president of the disease control center in front of him. you sent out this pamphlet and you're cutting because of the sequestration and 250,000 children in maryland would go without immunization and i have the obama budget in front of m

there is so much to do. i hope at the end of this day we will indeed all follow the lead of that student, walk out and say what are one or two things i'm going to do differently and better? how are we going to improve this situation? i hope if you take one and only one thing from melinda and my and ruslyn's remarks today, if you have an idea, please bring them to us. we want to learn from you. we are in this together and i want to say thank you because the most important thing we have is a recognition that you understand that this is indeed a national issue for us to deal with. i'm looking forward to the rest of the day, i appreciate your presence and i appreciate your leadership, melinda, and let's get on with it. (applause). >> i have the honor of sbre duesing our moderator, tom perez has graciously agreed to stay and participate in our first panel, business creating a healthy safe and inclusive environment for all school students, the role of our federal government. tom perez, assistant secretary for civi

it is not the only way to do it. i've been talking and continue to talk with colleagues across the political spectrum and across the aisle about a compromise approach, and i remain optimistic that we will be able to roll one out. soy're not 100% there yet, for purposes of this committee's markup, i have circulated my own bill, while we finalize a bipartisan compromise. i have a statement about the bill i will put in the record with the chairman's approval, with numerous letters of support. for now, i will highlight it does two critical things -- helps get states into the database and requires background checks for all gun sales. >> the senator has a right to substitute. i would assume we accept the substitute -- of course the bill would be open -- accept the substitute to his bill, and then it would be open to amendment, and before i yield to the senator, i know we have senator franken, senator schumer, senator hatch, senator flake, so that amendment is accepted, and senator grassley? >> i want to speak about my objec

he refused to do so. that time, he became combative, belligerent and struck sergeant carter and officer addleburn in the face. he even spat on sergeant carter as well. >> it is up to the institutional classification team to decide penn's fate. if he goes to close management level one, he'll face an array of new restrictions, including only being allowed out of his cell six hours per week for recreation. >> so, he's had ten drs in a year and three months. okay. he meets the criteria of the rule. >> he meets the criteria of the rule. >> he's found guilty of not just one, but two battery. >> and not to mention, i mean, if he would have cuffed up to start with, he wouldn't be in here. >> yes. >> i'm good. >> all right. come on back. >> inmate penn, ict has the deliberated on this. we are going to recommend that you be placed on close management one. you have 15 days to appeal that through the grievance procedure. do understand that? >> yes, sir. >> okay, that's all. >> every six months, you're up for a review

it is a decent thing to do. then he said -- look, there are all kinds of pressures that we just throughout american history. we just to the right thing to do, a productive thing to do, not to the shortsighted profiteering and patient -- of a few giant corporations, who are the muscle behind freezing depreciated minimum-wage. now in deepby internal discussions as to what they will do. they will come out for a higher minimum, i think, but the question is how high. they are being embarrassed by companies like costco who pay $11.50 for starters. host: ralph nader, author of many books and articles, including "unsafe at any speed." his latest book is "17 solutions." michael, lansing, ill.. hello, michael. caller: talking about the differences between-rights and positive rights, like the right to be left alone, but positive rights, for the government does not give you money or something, you do not have any rights. the less money you have, the less freedom you got. conservatives just cram their flag down your throat be

i do not have the luxury to do that. what do we do? three things. first, make the choice to get into the fight and know why you're doing it. [applause] many times you run on slogans and that is fine. i'm not telling you to get rid of slogans. understand why you're getting into it. ask yourself, if i can accomplish one thing while in office, what would that be? if i have to spend every single political capital that i have, what would i do? what would i do with that effort? ran on a slogan of building a beautiful city, fiscal discipline, and communication. when i asked myself what i really wanted to do, it would be to make sure our city was financially stable. i wanted to make sure that the children my -- the city my children were growing up in was a city that was financially stable. with the national debt and the state debt -- i do not want to put another burden on a local level. the best solutions are found at the local level. saratoga springs was incorporated in 1997. we had two state rodads. everything was agriculture. we had our own self-sufficien

it allows us to say how we do it. just has to be balanced and does not direct cuts on any program. >> we will have a lot more discussion on what the word balance means. senator sanders. >> mine in a slightly different than senator johnson's. it takes a slightly different approach. it does what i think the american people want us to do, and that is deal with deficit reduction, but deal with it in a way that is fair. what is fair is to understand that right now, corporate profits are at an all-time high. large corporations are doing phenomenally well, while corporate income tax revenue as a percentage of gdp is near a record low. that is a fact. corporations are making huge amounts of money, and yet what they are paying in income tax, about 12% of their profits is the lowest it has been since 1972. furthermore, not a whole lot of people know this, one out of four profitable corporations pay zero taxes. so the debate that senator johnson and i have about how you do deficit reduction, what he wants to do is cut, and i beli

to? >> yes, i do. taking that last statement, is there reason to believe that we are and you now have more confidence? how we earn that competence with the existing system? >> sir, i am confident in the stockpile that provides the sustainment in the hedge against any technical failure that might experience. every year the commander of my predecessor, i am responsible to provide an assessment of the stockpile. >> you have had the resources can you meet her expectations into ours? >> the resources over the last couple of years have helped us. resources have dwindled to an unacceptable point. >> i'm referring to the number of ground-based interceptors going down under this administration from 44 up to 30. it's really more than i because there are 10 of them that would've been part of the ground-based interceptor, which was the protection of the event until eastern united states. the statement was made where you have a radar system and agree what is necessary for you ground-based interceptor, but you won't

we're not going to do yours. >> i'm going to do everything in my power to make, you know, the systemork for me, in my favor. >> entering -- >> in regards to going to the hole. >> coming up -- >> [ bleep ] happens. >> george grahf faces the disciplinary board for flooding his cell block. >> you know what happens here. >> an unexpected development infuriates michael gill. and more trouble for timothy schreiber. >> as i was walking by for count, he had his hands down his pants making the masturbating motion. >>> confined to limon's administrative segregation unit, inmate george grahf still found a way to make a statement when he flooded his cell and unleashed a deluge on to the rest of the cell block. and then refused to leave his cell, prompting a forced cell extraction. >> it makes a point. here's the thing. i'll explain this real simply. is my actions, right, that day affected how many people? >> lots. >> okay. their actions only affected who? me, right? it might be petty. it might be stupid. you got to understand, we live in a box. i live in a box. that's it. my life is in a box. we

to deal. he should be doing that every weekend. you always can work better with somebody that you have a chance to build a social relationship with. qwestering is here. it will go on for a while. it's not going to be the end of the world as we know it. and everybody was saying, oh, we're going to-- the worst-case scenario is exactly what we're going to implement." and now they're into the real world and they'll try to find ways to do more with less, and then hopefully congress will come together and modify sequestering to cut things back where we can afford it, and where-- and not where we can't and keep in mind, no program to reduce the deficit is-- makes any sense whatsoever unless you address the issue of entitlements-- edcare, medicaid, social security-- interest payment on the debt which you can't touch and defense spending. everything else is tiny compared to that. >> schieffer: all right let's talk a little bit about guns. you're in the forfront of this debate. that's for sure. itarchs peers from-- it appears from what we're