to address this. ms. pelosi: and they do not want to have a public hearing so the public can hear the evidence to substantiate or to document a need. in closing, though, i want to yield back to my distinguished chairman, mr. becerra, and to the leader of our future forum for any closing remarks they may have. mr. swalwell: closing having talked to thousands of young people, it's a generation that's very collaborative and inventive but a generation that's pulling its hair out when it looks at republican leaders in this town and their failure to collaborate on these issues. and so as we continue to go across the country, it is quite frustrating when we're asked, what are we doing on corporate inversions to keep jobs here? what are we doing to just pass a budget like we all have to pass in our households? what are we doing to make sure that people don't get pregnant? people say, do your job. be as collaborative as we are and i think that's our message to house republicans. chairman becerra. mr. becerra: i would simply close by

to pennsylvania. how are we going do that? change the incentives in the tax codes and override the intentatives in the tax agreements that >>> so, i want to incent vise them and if any company in pennsylvania ever took a penny in taxpayer dollars in grants or loans or anything that they got from the taxpayers and if they move jobs out overseas, they're going to have to pay all of that back before they are permitted to leave. we are also going to look at how we create more renewable energy to create jobs and somebody's going to be the 21st century energy power and it's going to be somebody. i want tootoo be us because there will be jobs right here in america. and finally, when i was a senator from new york, i stood up for a lot of workers, particularly union workers who were being disadvantaged by unfair trade around the world and i took after china, took after some of these other countries. i am absolutely committed to making sure that we don't let those kinds of unfair trade practices cost us jobs anymore. so, i'm going to tak

they need to do, but what they don't know want to do. we can solve these political problems, but the war goes on. and there was so many times i had to appeal to people in my own party and the other party. we have to remember our legacy is built iding, not tearing dow sean. you can get this done. i wouldn't run if i couldn't get this done. >> you mentioned in the last segment this is what the lord wants us to do, and i know you to be a guy of deep faith. what does that mean in terms of how that inspires you? in other words, some people might take that as redistribute the wealth. that's not what you believe in. you believe in freedom and responsibility. >> you see people who except for the grace of god go i who are sitting in wheelchairs who can barely move the handles. you can be somebody who is not a believer and still look and we can't let them be in the shadows. we can't ignore them. that's not right. everybody is made in the image of the lord. give them a chance. give them a chance to rise. now, how did we ever think -- seriously, sean

do you need to make a video? do you talk to more friends about your business? do you want to make a cool gadget? >> what about the fourth point, the future? >> the future -- now, you're gonna be in business for the long haul. so you want to project what you're gonna be doing over the next five years. write down your goals for the first year, second, third, fourth, and fifth year, and this will help you see your growth over time. >> and that brings us to the last and possibly the most important part of the plan -- the cash. >> every business needs cash, and we like to call it "start-up capital." talk to your friends and family about them investing into your company and reassure them that you'll pay them back. look into your savings or your allowances. and i like to say focus on very three important things in your business. the first thing is the price -- what you'll sell it as -- the cost that it'll take to make your product, and also the quantity of products that you'd like to sell. with these things, you've figured out your profit. >> okay, so now we have our

so at the end, i ask the question, is what we do to the environment also what we do to each other? t know if i can change somebody's behavior or actions in the world. the one thing i can do is try to step into people's hearts and try to get them to say, oh, wow. we got to do something. that's what i feel. >> you can watch the full performance of "dead reckoning" on line at odrdance.org. >>> meanwhile the bay area political environment lands in the grips of the housing afford ability crisis. this week housing and urban development wrapped up a nationwide tour with visits to san francisco, oakland and berkeley. castro says he's pressing congress for more money for federal housing vouchers to keep low-income residents living in this region. there was also other activity this week. there were heated city council meetings in east bay and the peninsula and new penalty protection were passed in san francisco. joining me now to discuss these stories are romero, and devon katayuma. let's start with you, devon. it was lots of fireworks. >> apparently hundreds of people signed up for the city

we need to do something here. mr. delaney: whenever this does to address this problem we should be putting on the table. members that real board . under sarbanes-oxley the board has to certify that the person is an expert at audit committee related matters. for whatever the company does. we need that kind of certification for these board members. evans: can anybody hear name the four federal board members? to delaney: i just look them up. i could not certify that any of these people are experts. i am a fiduciary of the federal government's money and the state of maryland's money. >> the gentleman from maryland makes a very good point but i would caution my colleagues that federal law cannot dictate who was on the board of metro. tilde payingal law jurisdictions who they get to a point of metro. if federal law wants to do that we would have to change it. we don't pay an operating subsidy and so we can tread lightly and telling virginia and maryland ndc who will serve on the board. this is not a federal entity. mr. byers

is the guy who told us to do this is going to go out there and self identified that he told us to do it and he going to identify, and is he going to defend us? in this instance, the thursday probably the way you would imagine that friday to be at the white house. the day friday, the president told his staff to throw away the radio broadcast that he had already produced, and he went on live saturday morning and did what we all would have hoped he did. and within a few weeks he visited fort meade, visibly. that is what you need from the commander in chief. interject, the team that is selected, i would add one additional one, because it is such a dominant role that the defense department plays, and that is the secretary of defense. ciathe relationship of dni, director, and secretary of defense, largely delegated to the undersecretary for intelligence. that personnel selection team, when it comes to the dod, is intended to mention. mr. hayden: lifelong personal friends, and it was still almost in the too hard to do box. mr. shedd: in the 18 months. >> i recall certain conversations, peopl

>> guest: we still have a lot of work to do. t's going to be a nasty general election. >> host: of course but are we ready and prepared for the struggle? >> guest: i think we are. and hillary clinton is the most phenomenal woman i've ever met and i know people say that about politicians. but i'm telling you this woman knows so much about so many things and is so committed. she is the child of the 60s who committed herself to making a difference in people's lives. and she's done it ever since the children's defense fund all the way up to running for for president of the united states. so, i'm excited about it. i'm nervous. i won't be happy until it's over but i can sometimes imagine going to the inauguration and seeing a woman raised her hand and take the oath of office. >> host: i think about that and ambition that and i listened to her last evening when she won arizona and she talked about her vision for what is possible and she said i think in the most profound way that this gloom and doom that it's being preached about how bad

bill: i do not make progress to we invest in companies that do the work. are able to develop diagnostics now. the human genome project took 10 years and $4 billion to sequence one genome. you can now do that in an hour on a machine that fits on this table. we can now look at the genome and find places where we see errors. the diagnostic comes first. the therapies, after that. we are moving to a place where company that we invested in, it is a crisper gene editing technology. that may not mean a lot to a lot agoeople, but live years the idea of that company was hard to fathom -- that it could be a company. things are moving quickly now, i hope so, that we will have treatments for things that seem emily: what is the goal? untreatable is it 200 years? 500? bill: the goal i would put before that, if you look around the world, or even san francisco today, this area of the world, silicon valley is great at innovation, words that are so overused that people get tired of hearing about them. the goal i would set out does not have to do with those words. it has to d

we have more work to do. i am proud to hold up our progress to other states as a model that they can all learn from us very these new reforms of proposals we are bringing you will build on this is best of all on the success of all of the programs we have brought you. and i am sending to people around this country the recommendations that i think can help solve this problem across our country. our economic growth is increasing the number of jobs available as well as the types of jobs available. if you ask people about ohio, many will say it is the football team, agriculture, or steel. it has always been our goal to bring about a significant broadening of the base of ohio business and we see that in the positions that have been greeted by some of ohio's newest by some of ohio's newest employers. think about this. amazon. three investments in the state including in wilmington, amazon picking us in the midwest to carry the ball for them. how about the automotive glass maker? they talk about losing jobs. the chines

in life, you should do it so well that no man living, no man dead or no man yet to be could do it better, so if you could make yourself to that, when they are looking for someone in that field, whether it's engineering or physics or medicine or business or literature, so well accomplished in your feel, you may not get the job but it's not because you weren't prepared. be prepared for the opportunity so that you can make the change. he was saying the way you fight the system is excel. >> right, right. i mean, when you've got -- you got to be you and you went to medical school and you were one of 76, you were oh only black men among 76 white students. >> yes. >> how -- and it was the first time when you were in a nonsegregated environment. how was that? and you became class president and you really did excel, you listened to may's words. i'm wondering how it was. how were you treated -- how did you feel -- did et get in the way, obviously not because you graduated, one of the top three in your class, right? am i right about that? >> that's right. >> i wonder, did it get in the way? how was

to. i can give you examples of how you do that. and you can also use that proximity to put your finger on the scales and take what should be an open, transparent process, put your fingers on the scales and push to a particular outcome. and i think a national security advisor has to be aware of those temptations and resist them. and that's what president bush basically said. and very briefly, the only thing he said when he asked me to be national security advisor -- i told him i thought it was a mistake. there were a lot of people who would better do the job than i. but it is one of the few arguments i lost with the president. when you get in that position, only thing he said to me, was i want you to be an honest broker. i interpreted that that he wanted a process that is transparent, in which the cabinet secretaries would be full participants, and the vice president would be full participant. they would have access to him. they would be able to express their views to him, and it would be a balanced way with a full set of views avail

that's what we get paid to do. we have got to focus ognjen rating that capability today -- ognjen rating that capability today. so -- on generating that capability today. we can't wait for the broader discussion to complete itself. it's just a losing strategy for us. that's been the focus for u.s. cybercommand, at the operational level that i and the team really focus at. mr. kaine: let me ask you another question. i think senator shaheen may have asked this with respect to nato. another item that's very common in this committee is we look at the postures of other commands, joint training exercises. india does more joint training with the united states than any other nation. we have marines deployed throughout africa and these special purpose magazine tags doing train. what's our posture vis-a-vis sort of partners in the cyberarea, in the training that we do together in the development of giant resiliency strategies. mr. rogers: we do some level of training with key allies. one of the challenges for us is how do you

you want me to do? i mean, you know what i'd have to do to get that kind of money. forgive me. but i need you out here because i'm dying. i can't -- >> get me out of here, skye. >> i can't do this. i'm telling you right now. if you don't get out, i don't think i can do this. do you still think i'm beautiful? >> you're gorgeous. look at you. you're absolutely gorgeous. >> i've been sober. >> have you? i'm proud of you. thank you. >> you're proud of me? >> i am. you did good, baby. >> but you remember what i said. >> look at every pod i've been on. i've been smashing people on every pod i go to, i smash somebody. i love you. >> i love you. you have no idea what i would do. i'd go to the end of the earth for you. >> i know you would. >> after 20 minutes the phone shuts off automatically and the two are cut off. >> [ bleep ]. >> i'm going to break this window. >> i'll write you. i can't -- don't walk away. [ crying ] >> i have to get him out. i just don't have any other choices right now. i feel the weight of the world on my shoulders. that's how he made me feel. like i

we have time in may to do that. sergeant kilshon and i were talking about we can talk about this every week, at least come to consensus on what the options are, doj will weigh in, what we can bring to the public for the two meetings will be some options and we can get the public's feedback and then take it back and vote. as opposed to all the feedback usmaking last-minute changes, it gives us a chance to let the public be aware of all the options. >> it's pretty lengthy, would you take a piece at a time or a section at a time? >> the stake holders, as you can see, there's a lot of agreement on a sit amount. i think comes down to maybe 10 or 12 issues. we can see how it goes but my idea would be for the first discussion to march through it big issue by big issue, not -- i know we painstaking went through the body worn camera word by word but that would not be my intent. my suggestion is that each of us have read ought materials and come with suggestions of exactly what we're looking for in the policy. i think it comes

but i don't know how to do it in texas. do you go up and do you do what? >> you would go to department of motor vehicles. you would show the documentation showing who you are and you're eligible for license. in context of aliens, and this is a j-377 to 382 outlining the process, then the state verifies that the individual has authorization to be in the country. that is under federal i.d. act. >> i do know, because i've experienced it, that lines are very long at the dmvs. sometimes people wait the entire day. and i know they leave the next day when they haven't gotten to them. and they keep coming back. it's not an ideal situation. in most states to avoid the frustration do ramp up but many states don't. people just keep coming back until their license can be processed. so why is it that you have to spend all this money? why can't you just have your regular process and let people wait on line? >> first of all under the federal real i.d. act if our state's driver's licenses recipient want to be able to use that license to get through airport security, tsa se

he was going to keep doing that. think another aspect people don't look at a lot too, he was a mentor to a lot of different artists, up-and-coming artists. there is a new girl on atlantic records now, she talked to me. she was able to do a track with him, and in the girl band. she said she just wanted to lick the spit off of the microphone so she could him by the sum of his power -- so she could imbibe some of his power. and then another talent. i think he gets pushed. he wanted everybody, i think -- people have gotten lazy in the visa industry. it is very assembly-line, let's find the next this one, that one. individualism is what stands out. that is what stands out with friends, with michael, stevie kochan -- drake. bu and the best you. youl. ou and be the best jeff glor: they burst onto the scene in the 1970's. gail mitchell: their solo careers -- sasha frere-jones: their solo careers were quite close together. jeff glor: did they know each other, learn at all from each other? sasha frere-jones: there is a clip whe

need to do to say their prayers. tell them, do not let anybody be isolated and do not let anybody be bullied. with the young people and, of course, with the higher ups. i'd never hesitate to call their school, and i do. and i think they love when i call there. yeah. >> the other thing we've seen is bullying, when we were kids, it took place in schools. now it's 24 hours a day on social media. it's not just happening in the schools. do you monitor their social media? >> they have limited social media in the first place. but i follow their instagram or whatever it's called. i follow them. but we have talked about it and we have definitely talked about being on social media safely and who you talk to and who you don't. and i think they are pretty protected. but i just feel bad for kids these days. it's a 24/7 world and never shuts off. i wouldn't have wanted to have grown up like that. >> the thing is, if you talk to people who are counselors, our children have a lot of challenges. and there are a lot of kids out there

to ak shoes. i love i idea of doing one simple jewelry. u pull one on the rye side as prrks sfwrrnl. >> you touch it to one side here and other side here. it prevents the top from popping up. remember how you to do that all high belong. prchl it pops right back. hut just go all over. just go crazy, trish! >> i love doing that. >> and that's in my cable. >> isn't that such oop easy solution? people say tape them. but if you tape them, you can't move. it gets sweaty. this is a much better tip. >> thank you. >> we're going moment. but first this is "today" on >>> all right. before we go, we got a couple of shoutouts. do you want to slim down for summer? who doesn't. go to hoda and kathie lee and we want people who want to get healthy. and we're looking for married couples who work together and tell us about about eye a and no time kevin costner is with us, james den any and for rich wing. >> no, they're off, everyone. have a great weekend. we're going to see you on fun . >> breaking news is coming out of lack is land air force base. >> we lear

to do it. that's the key thing here. and so, i think one of the lessons to be learned, especially when you start thinking about the electronic surveillance activities that occurred during the investigation and activities around the martin luther king case, is that there were insufficient constraints on did government's authority to engage in national security surveillance, so-called at that time, for these purposes. and one of the important lessons, i mean, you cannot really understand american surveillance law the way it exists today. you can't understand the statutory framework in which we operate today, you can't understand the constraints that we have on us today if you don't understand the king case. and so, to contrast what happened in the past and to shed a little light on where we are today, there is much more significant accountability and oversight, constraints, with respect to the fbi's surveillance activities than there were in the past. in fact, just this week, the director of the f

it would be a very big thing to do. pplause] the last thing i want to say is this, i don't want to keep you in, it is a beautiful day. in the end, being president is a doing job. there is a reason it is called the chief executive. she is the best doer i have ever known, and she was when i first met her. look, i sympathize with these young people who are excited about being told there is one explanation for the misery of america, and that is the greed of the wall street banks. but the truth is, wall street is smaller, and new york city is growing like crazy, led by the bronx and brookland and queens, and entrepreneurs in new york and manhattan that are diversifying the income. right? so, what are we going to do about this? the thing that all -- always struck me about hillary, she would say, what am i going to do? what am i going to do? the only thing that disappointed me about the debate, was the sneering reference her opponent may two the award she won in the south. [laughter] we know how conservative they are. but democ

need to do the job we ask them to do.n to make college affordable again. i share that goal with senator sanders. we have a different way of doing it. i want you to understand the difference because i think it's important. i said, look, we need to have debt free tuition. you don't have to borrow a penny. if you're wealthy, you have to pay. i believe that is a great fairer and more affordable way to get to get to affordable college. what i have said is, i'm going to work to make sure everybody who needs it, gets to go to a public college or university without borrowing a penny. i want to work to get the cost down. i am asked units to work ten 10 hours a to work week. if they do work at the college or university, that would help lower the cost. we can get the cost down for more people and that will help us send more to college. i pay for it by taxing the we'll. -- the wealthy. i can afford to do that. senator sanders has the same goal. he advocates free college. that means free for everybody including donald trump's kids. i

they want to do their job. i'm going to let them do their job. leaders of mexico. in particular, one person. don't let this happen anymore. mexico could stop it also. they can stop it first. you want to become a citizen of america k mexico it's impossible. what going on is the stupidity of our leadership. because they want to defebds it. we're going to do that. we're going to have the boarder patrol. unbelievable. we're going to lets these people do their job. i said to them, if i win, i'm going to stop it. you watch what happens. >> and coming up, some closing thoughts from the on the record town hall with donald trump in milwauke milwaukee. that's straight ahead. (singing alougetting to know you. getting to know all about you... getting to like you. getting to hope you like me... is someone getting to know your credit? not without your say so. credit lock lets you lock and unlock your transunion credit report with the swipe of a finger. getting to know you. getting to know all about you... get one-touch credit lock, plus your score and report a

we have to do that. it is to ay you do confront it. you can't run from it, which is what we always do. charlie: thank you for coming. >> thank you. charlie: ken burns, part one and two, on the great jackie robinson coming up on pbs. thank you for joining us. see you next time. . >> with all due respect to pope francis every time you think keep gotten out, they in.ing you back ♪ happy good friday, sports fans. i say good friday because, wow it's been. news day hypothetical situation, you're the president and the pope to the vatican to give you the speech. wwbsd. >> that's kind of

that we can't afford to do it that way. as perfect as it would be in some ways. >> i agree with you, we don't have time to wait. >> yes, ma'am. >> when we look at the department, what level of communication do you have with the different communities within the departments? say with regards to acquisition or installations to ensure that the items we purchase or the facilities that we're building are able to take those threats that we're looking at from cyber into account? >> i would tell you the acquisition piece is one of the areas that we still need a lot work. it's not because people aren't working hard. but i've always been struck by the analogy we would never by a ship, a tank, an aircraft, without the operational vision driving exactly how we designed it, built it, structured it. and yet for much of our networks and infrastructure, that has not historically been our model. we focused on efficiency and price. didn't really focus on operational i paoperation al impact. we didn't really think at the time we'd be dealing in

not have to do that. the challenge is how do we break through our collective resistance to taking on new information that would challenge a belief system that has turned into a full-fledged bubblelike how do we get-- through that bubble in a way that will actually lead to political change and policy changes and budgetary changes. i will and with that question so we make sure we have time to discuss that. it is a terrific book, and it is an honored to talk about it. thank you. thank you. i will exercise my prerogative as chair to pick up on something rosa said and at the end. how do you respond to the charge you do not care? one of the strongest parts of the research that i like that you said today, mark, is individuals can be risk adverse, can choose not to undertake certain risky behaviors, but governments should be risk neutral. it is so important because when the government is seen to be dedicating resources that are vastly out of proportion to the dangers they are fixing, then im thingout one implies n

i will make a fool of myself to get the message out if that is what i have to do. i think that she has made extraordinary strides in figuring out this job that when she came in made no sense to anybody. >> i give her enormous credit for doing this unbelievably difficult job, no question she had the finest line to walk that any first lady did. astonishing how hard it was and i give her enormous credit for doing it. i think at the end of the day the question is what is the message you are getting out? she did something like what sandra at did which was by being there and being successful at it, she got a message out that has very little to do with cale in my opinion. but she was the icon as was sandra and it took in her case as it did in sandra's and ruth's cases an unbelievable amount of self discipline. >> i think that is an interesting place for us to end. we are out of time. thank our authors today. [applause] >> we will be adjourning to the bookstore sales tent and signing area booth number 153. peter slevin will be there >> >> will talk to gilbert who wrote "bil

bill: i do not make progress to we invest in companies that do the work. are able to develop diagnostics now. the human genome project took 10 years and $4 billion to sequence one genome. you can now do that in an hour on a machine. we can now look at the genome and find places where we see errors. the diagnostic comes first. we are now moving to a place to accompany we invested in, where -- editing technology. that may not mean something to a lot of people, but five years ago, the idea of the company was hard to fathom that that could be a company. those will move very quickly now in a way that we will have treatments that seem untreatable. emily: what is the goal? is it 200 years? 500? bill: the goal i would put if you look around the world, or even san francisco today, this area of the world, silicon valley is great as an -- at innovation, words that are so overused that people get tired of hearing about them. doesoal i would set out not have to do with those words. it has to do with distribution. country,that in this if you are a white male, your avera

>> i mean, i think we're going to do really well. i hope so. >> i want to ask every one of you to come out on tuesday and vote for me, ten times. >> if i tell you i'll fight for you, i'll stand for you, i'll work for you, that's exactly what i'll do. if you will give me the chance. >> we are hoping here in wisconsin, there will be a record-breaking turnout. if people come out to vote in large numbers, i think we're going to do very, very well. and that's what we're hoping for. >> so here's why wisconsin matters. it's a state where the front-runners are the underdogs, which means we could see some big swings in momentum after tonight. it's also stand-alone. nothing before, a couple weeks before, nothing really a couple weeks after. so can cruz and the stop-trump forces notch the win? they're readying for a war at the cleveland convention, but they first have to keep trump off the pace in his delegate hunt starting tonight. and if trump pulls off the upset, watch out. meanwhile, on the left, can sanders put up a big enough win to put a

and what it has to do is serve a court order to do that. ly in certain conditions can it do it. emily: what keeps you up at night? what worries you most? ♪ emily: your first day in the private sector, what was that like? general alexander: my first day. it was april fools'. 1 april. knowing me and what are my friends like, i was betting somebody would call me and say , your retirement has been pushed back. my first day i got on a plane to , go to a conference in las vegas. i was not sure what i would do. i had several job offers. i did not know if i wanted to work for somebody. i was not looking forward to working with somebody. i talked to some financial institutions at other companies. they said with what you know about cyber security, why not start a cyber security company? to solve some of these problems, and the more we got onto it, i talked to some of the guys, and i said, hey, would you be interested in doing this, and in six weeks, we started a company. you have a cyber security firm, and you are going through. ironnet. you said you

they're not going to do it. they're going to be much more vigilant about the environment because they live in it. they're not a distant decision maker. they're an on-the-spot. and that's one of the old ideas about democracy. you make the decision because you live with the results. so i think we would have had a different distribution of income and wealth in this country; we would have had a very different relationship to keeping the jobs and the production here; and we would have had a very different relationship to the environment. or to make a long story short-- i could go on with examples all night--we would have had a different history as a nation. we'd look different; we'd feel different; we'd relate to one another differently. and guess what. if the gap between rich and poor was narrowed, that wouldn't, then, allow the rich to buy the political system the way they y do nowow, would itit? so it'd make a contribution there, too. wow! sounds interesting. let me take it another step. is this feasible? i know so

they had to do something. >> right. >> your reference to the snake and mongoose is interesting. you are a parent and so am i. all i could think of is the book little be. little be, why do you flee? because there is a scary snake chasing me? mongoose is chasing the snake and ultimately the lion is the one -- anyway, check it out. it's a great book. great to see you, stirewalt. >> good to see you, too. >> joining us now herman cain former presidential candidate and fox news contributor. author of "the right problems" what every candidate should be working on. editor and chief of daily wire.com of an article critical of trump for complaining about this plan. good to see you both. herman cain, tell us why this is nod a good idea for cruz and kasich. >> it's not a good idea because sometimes divide and conquer works. but, in politics, it may not and we really won't know until after the primaries tomorrow and the primaries a week from tomorrow. that's when we will know. but, here's what this alliance does recognize. it recognizes that john kasich and ted cruz can not get the nomination

and other opportunity for them to do so. enting donald trump to exercise his ability of spree speech. let's turn to the story coming on the "new york times." you have the president bragging about his economic record. calling it a legacy. he is not a great communicator like the great president reagan. >> i am just a realist. i will tell you these numbers tell more. you ask them how will they feel. they do not feel good. just look at the consumer sentiment numbers that came in. we are walking through this chart here. under president obama, the economy has grown 1.8%. come on. under president reagan. obama took office. the labor participation rate was about 56%. a number of people willing to work. guess what, they do not want to work anymore. it is 63%. how do you like this? it has gone up from 46 million. 13 million more americans are on food stamps now. here is the national debt he had 19 trillion. climbing every day. how delusional is this president? fox news economic analysts. good to see you guys. i look at this. trying to

this is a paper that looks to do that. and it was well worth the time, even on the weekend, to take a quick loo being k at the paper e you thoughts and impressions and about how that fits into the way we think about our policier tos asia at large. as i real the paper, there really are two key premises. i think they're worth pointing out and are all to the good. one, we in the united states and with our allies as well have to be able to adapt our longstanding alliance system that used to be predominantly, if not in some cases solely, a hub and spoke system. i think andrew points this out. the federated process -- the systems that csis is looking at. while hub and spoke was the predominant nature of our relationships in asia, it can't be the only way we look at it. i do think that we haven't only looked at that as the way for many years spanning a number of administrations. but that we have to continue that progress. also the second premise, if you will, is that maritime issues are and will continue to be critical to the pros

we don't have enough money to do the things we have to do. what do you say to the american people? secretary carter: that we need to come together as we did in the two-year wave behind the bipartisan budget agreement. it's the only way. i can't do much about that as secretary of defense. but as a citizen and you have your eyes open, you know that -- well, as secretary of defense, but i do know is our guest strategic defense is the collapse of bipartisan budget agreements going forward, the restoration of the sequester caps. we know we are in real trouble if that happens. i have been consistent in my testimony that we have got to avoid that. we got a reprieve. i'm extremely grateful that we got people to come together. we need to keep doing that. we all know, john, we can do the math. you can't balance the books on the backs of discretionary spending. so you got to get in the other parts of the budget. that's much bigger than somebody who has an executive branch responsibility, even a vital line -- vital one like mine, can influence. if we get back to sequester, we are in trouble. s

she refused to do it three times. morrow, she was asked a straightforward question. amanda gave the house answer, to say, you know, they refuse to answer a very simple question. is he qualified. let me tell you why they're refusing. because they decided after wisconsin that they were going to run a negative strategy, they were going to disqualify bernie sanders. they were going to defeat him. then they'll worry about putting the party back together. they disqualify strategy through surrogating attacking bernie from guns to foreign policy, through the secretary, refusing to answer a simple question about his equalatioqualificatio. i saw bernie frank three or four times say bernie in that news day editorial board, he was wandering, he didn't seem to understand what's going on, okay. you know, we understand what's going on with their campaign. they're trying to question bernie sanders' capacity to be president of the united states. they're trying to say that he doesn't, you know, that he is not qualified to be president o

it all by themselves they need help we need help and able to do the work we've been doing so i ask that you take heed to the information that you got from the task force they working hard on getting if together and addressed one of the needs we cover safety equipment and taking care of the ketchups where they're available and not available that's where were we come in. >> what a great program a mobile kitchen. >> on wheels it was designed on wheels and it is what you call an induction system that means it is 50 persecutes our times on cooking and 70 times more efficient than anything else and all run on one system. >> i'd like to see that sometime thank you so much. >> next speaker. >> good afternoon honorable body my name is m j isabel the recipient of a voucher from e sf approximately 7 months ago a senior friend of mine extracted me to healthy seniors program (laughter) i went protesting and saying eave learned nothing i learned something i stayed in the program and found that i can do things with my health that i didn't know i could do have a better wa

know what to do. it's our duty, actually. it's our civic duty. and i feel it so strongly, because i do believe in democracy, i do believe that we can change the laws like we did for the farm workers, right, to get them that cold drinking water and those rest periods, and get some of the pesticides off of our food, you know? and for women to get the right to vote, and get women elected, you know, to office. all these things. but we have to do it. if we can just remember that, that if we don't do it, it's not going to happen. we have a responsibility. >> hinojosa: dolores huerta, thank you for all of the work that you've done on behalf of so many working americans. we really appreciate it, and it's been an honor to have you on the show. >> thank you very much. continue the conversation at wgbh.org/oneonone. >>> funding for "overhead" with evan smith is provided in part by m.f.i. foundation, improving the quality of life within our community. and from the texas board of legal specialization, board certifi

what does that have to do with it? e student debt, you're a good student, you look for a job and can't find a job. we're going to bring jobs back to this country. we're not going to let china and new mexico all mexico -- they're not going to let the companies like pfizer go. when you do well, now you're going to look for a job and get a great job, the job that you want. but we're going to do something with engs tensions and low interest rates. thank you. >> we have more questions for donald trump. we're going to take a short break and be right back with our on the record 2016 town hall. hey buddy, you're squashing me! liquid wart remover? could take weeks to treat. embarrassing wart? dr. scholl's freeze away wipes 'em out fast with as few as one treatment. freeze away! dr. scholl's. the #1 selling freeze brand. some say "free the whales." for them, nothing else is acceptable. but nothing could be worse for the whales. most of the orcas at seaworld were born here. sending them into the wild wouldn't be noble. it could be

going to make a massive impact on what we do. in the third month we announced we opened transgender service, no longer could you be separated for being transgendered. the together a plan to implement what that might mean. in the fourth month we announced work we had already been doing about force the future, which was the next ordinary effort, we have people from across government putting together reforms to really revitalize the personnel system, both civilian and military side. are, in the case of military, 50 years overdue. in the case of civilians, 125 years overdue. in the fifth month, we went out and did women in combat and all of the rules about that. it's been an ongoing process for us. i do think him as usa today reported not long ago, it has been the most distorted here for personal reform in the history of the department. i'm really grateful to dr. carter for being a visionary on these issues. it was really -- it's often been said in some of the articles about my leaving the department that i was the architect these ref

they need to do that. ce -- japan has experimented with reflation and done a lot of fiscal deficits, but what they have not done a structural reform. tom: adam posen, i want you to follow up after professor rogoff. what have we learned? i'm frightened to tell you how many years it has been since your book came out. what have we learned since the publication of "this time is different"? crisesstemic financial events.y long, painful advancedhat happens in economies, and they could sort of not recapitalize their banks, as europe has all the zombie banks and they cannot necessarily move quickly. it lasts even longer. you could say that is a better way to do things that is less painful in the long run. posen, what has the imf learned, and what is the view forward as we continue not through the crisis but a different set of crises now, including brazil? adam: i think we have learned a few things, the on the fact that these are persistent long effects with the financial crises. we have learned the structure of the

what are you going to do? i said i'm going to have to go back to the americans and ask for people to backfill. we're deep in the fight right now. and he said, well, he said, to reduce your demand on the american forces, i'll send six more fighters in. i'll send another reinforced special forces company of 150 special forces, well trained, fully kitted out, ready to go, to fight under your command. again, ladies and gentlemen, you can't find allies like that if you don't stand by them in their difficulties. so they may not be perfect. if we're waiting for perfect allies, we're going to be awfully alone in this world and from what i have seen in our own country, we're not perfect ourselves. let's figure a way to work together. let at the stop there and open time for questions here. >> thank you. [ applause ] >> thank you very much for that presentation. i'm jon alterman, the senior vice president in global security and the director of the middle east program. i have a few questions before we go to the audience wh

what i think we also need to do. we met with a group of marines who -- almost matter of fact way, said this capability we have to cover threats in the region may be cut in half next year because of other competing priorities. in a matter of fact way, like, they had to do it, because of the pressures they're having on budget and limited resources. i think we need to understand this particular case. i'm going to follow up in a private setting. but we need to do a better job. i told them. of give us that ghost of christmas future. give us a real meaningful idea of what your risk is going to look like if we're not successful and i know the chairman hopes to be successful with ending sequestration but we have to recognize it's a high threat we may have to deal with. if we do, what does that look like? if we're concerned with where do we go from here. with the chair's indulgence. >> i would say we know what the number's going to be. if sequestration, which is grave, we already are testifying today it's minimally adequate ri

and you do that to avoid miscalculation. sometimes people were upset, i wasn't one of them, that maybe we were looking at our good friends and allies on occasion in the intelligence business, you do that because sometimes your allies can get you in more trouble than you can get in yourself. you think of the defense pacts we have around the world. what if japan decides they want to be aggressive with a china convoy. we ought to know that. what if the filipinos decide they're going to be aggressive on pushing back without coordination with the united states. we have a defense pact with the philippines. shouldn't we know that? shouldn't we know that germany had relationships with iran prior to the iran deal? i argue we probably should know that. shouldn't we know what they're thinking after the iran deal? i would argue i would like to know that. if i'm a policy maker whose finger is on that button, if i'm deciding how to use our strategic intelligence to avoid trouble, then we need to be as aggressive as we can in accordance wit

to ets. ets is doing excellent work. a lu is distinguished researcher there working in -- with assessment in higher education. dan mccaffery who used to be a colleague of mine and steve kline's when we were at rand in the late '90s now has a chair -- he is one of the most thoughtful people, a statistician who really knows a great deal about the issues that fredrik was talking about. i want to say a little bit -- the bottom line is fredrik's paper is a serious critique and he poses problems that are important. and what i want to do is just make a couple of comments that are simulated by his argument and then i want to just tell you a little bit about a new way we might think about framing research on higher education, leading perhaps with educational assessment but going beyond that a little bit. i think that accountability did have a lot to do with the ramp up of assessment in higher education. i'm talking about the spellings commission and so on. but i want to note that in the case of our group, reform and not accountabi

look what they're going to do to us. and that was a great, great piece of -- great handout because it finally told us what they were going to do to us. some of us had been to some of the meetings, et cetera, but they wrap all these projects up in, you know, things like transit effectiveness project and it goes from one end of the city to the other and ought bus lines and then when they have their hearings there's little bits of here and there in. normal human can't keep up with it until you get something like that and you go, oh, my god, and they're painting it now. anyway, i'm here today as a small business customer. and i'm approaching 70 this year. i'm on the leading edge of the baby boomers. and that means there's a lot more of us coming. you know, i've seen things that said, you know, that at some point san francisco will be 30 percent seniors because there's a big lump of us coming. we have money to spend. we have money to spend at small businesses. we like to get out of the house. but the city is designing this wh

we have time in may to do that. sergeant kilshon and i were talking about we can talk about this every week, at least come to consensus on what the options are, doj will weigh in, what we can bring to the public for the two meetings will be some options and we can get the public's feedback and then take it back and vote. as opposed to all the feedback us making last-minute changes, it gives us a chance to let the public be aware of all the options. >> it's pretty lengthy, would you take a piece at a time or a section at a time? >> the stake holders, as you can see, there's a lot of agreement on a sit amount. i think comes down to maybe 10 or 12 issues. we can see how it goes but my idea would be for the first discussion to march through it big issue by big issue, not -- i know we painstaking went through the body worn camera word by word but that would not be my intent. my suggestion is that each of us have read ought materials and come with suggestions of exactly what we're looking for in the policy. i think it come

the democrats tried to do that back in 2008. barack obama and his team try to change the super delegate system. he ran a grass roots campaign, he was able to overcome the super delegate situation, right, the hillary clinton people stopped and asked him to be the people. the question is after this election cycle, are we going to see the democrats and the republicans try to revamp their system? >> one of his spokesman said that. saying the same thing. >> to your point, nationally it is the same way, the poll showed 56% of republican voters say who are has the most delegates could be the nominee. like wise, 5le % of vote percent. >> we hope it doesn't rain tomorrow. >> they don't think the rules are fair. >> not as delegate on the republican side. super delegates represent about 15% -- >> you are. >> i am a super delegate. >> represent about 15% of all the delegates. debbie wasserman schulz was talking about the number of elections have all been decided by the pledged delegates, the super delegates had no impact on those races. so t

it had to do with the cable because it is rubbing against them. that is just that, if not more important than the sleeves. we cannot spend all the resources we have just doing sleeves. we have to look at what is the risk. have a timeline on the completion of the sleeves? >> i don't. >> tonight at 10:00, a look back at president's giving their last beaches at the white house correspondents dinner. one of the key events each year in washington. >> i have not had time to watch the oscars. i was disappointed in that last movie -- >> look, george w. bush has brands making new campaign strategy. he is moving towards the political center, distancing himself from the political party, stealing ideas from the other party. i'm so glad that did morris -- dick morris has found work again. >> we will also speak with a past president of the white house speakers association. join us for live coverage of the correspondents dinner on saturday, april 30 at 6:00 on c-span. >> during campaign 2016, c-span takes you on the road to the white house, as we follow the candi

i wanted to do something immediate. we have new leadership and i want to make sure everyone had time to prepare for this hearing. we have a metro system in crisis in washington, d.c. we need to find out what has gone wrong, what steps have been taken to correct the problems, and we need to look at the management restructuring and we need to look at the financial structuring that is currently in place. there are few transit systems in the united states that received the subsidiization it does in washington. so we need to hold people accountable, see what is wrong, look at what has been done, and solutions for the future. that is the purpose of this hearing and what we will do today. i yield the balance of my time to the gentlelady ms. comstock. >> thank you, representative. i would like to introduce the new general manager of metro. we appreciate his work and i know when he first came in the washington area colleagues we all emphasized a cultural change and i appreciate you taking that to heart and facing the hard truths