and the last thing to do is make some time to relax. so, do something for five or 10 minutes that you know is gonna make you feel very serene, pet your dog, talk to a friend, doodle, do whatever you have to do, but set your alarm on your phone so that it's only five or 10 minutes, and not the next hour. - it seems that the best strategy for dealing with procrastination is self discipline. - you're absolutely right, and that's such a good word because researchers are finding that that is the most important thing that determines whether people are successful, so it's a good thing to practice. - great information. thanks, doctor. - thanks for having me. - there are lots of clever little sayings to remind us to not procrastinate. "don't put off tomorrow what you can do today", or, "he who hesitates is lost." mary poppins is far more encouraging as she explained, "a job begun is a job half done." of course, she didn't have to do homework every night, and study for tests, and write term papers, and prep for the sats, but still, her point is we

go to sea, when we do fly. our pilots will be less experienced, which is a daunting fact when you consider what we're asking them in wartime. our sailors will have less time at sea to practice together, to train together, to achieve the intricate teamwork needed to win in modern warfare. and the stress doesn't stop when they return to home port. current funding without the '17 bill and the supplemental will only allow for one month's notice before they move their families, placing a huge burden on their families, especially those with children. we'll continue to ask our people to work in sub standard conditions in over 6,000 buildings, in dismal condition, awaiting repair, replacement, or demolition. at the unit level, we'll have to shut down air wings in the short-term, and in the long-term, shortage of airplanes will get worse. we'll delay important upgrades that help us keep pace with the threat these delays or cancellations will put sailors at greater risk from cyberattacks with a growing threat of anti-ship

give us better capacity to do that. what is a challenge is to make that applicable in the tactical and strategic and technical operation environment that we often work. we are that half hours and days to develop solutions. if we have not done the homework before, we cannot deliver the solution. mr. zarate: two questions here that take us back to your remarks. you spoke about the need to limit the lateral movement is such as by using our first amendment rights. how do you plan to accomplish that, and the second question, are you reviewing insider threat detention efforts in response to wikileaks? director pompeo: we are constantly reviewing insider threat work. if there is one thing that doesn't involve -- there is a long history dating back to mesopotamia. this is a constant challenge and have to be very vigilant about. mr. zarate: the first amendment was an expert. director pompeo: a little less constitutional law and a lot more of a philosophical understanding. julian assange has no first amendment privileges, he is no

i have a lot of respect for the work he is trying to do. you heard him say the tax cut will pay for itself. the tax cut won't pay for itself because no tax cut has come close to paying for anything itself. it's not the same thing as saying they can't ever have any growth impacts but the growth impacts they have, which are uncertain, i can show you evidence of tax cuts that were negative in terms of growth. they are a couple of tenths of a percent at best and often not sustained. it is the idea that you can make up stories about how a lot of these very large aggressive tax cut is going to pay for itself. let's just agree we can stop pretending on that point. >> i think you can have dynamic scoring and growing the committee and frankly getting above 2% as opposed to below is huge. it is very important to do that. what i think it really depends on how you put the package together and you are obviously able to do tax reform in such a way that the committeconomy gro. we have had sort of flat growth and meeting incomes. if you can get that that mo

charlie: who do you expect to hear from? sen. warner: what we are doing, unlike maybe the other committee, is we need to do this in a deliberate, methodical process. as somebody who is impatient, to say the least, this is not happening near as quick as i would like. we have some of the intel community that still needs to get us full access to their underlying documents. what we want to do first is go through those documents. we have gone through and had our staffs reviewing thousands of pages in the three binders that created the january 6 intel report that reached the same conclusion about russian interference favoring trump against clinton, and also in terms of some of the possible connections, particularly through the trump campaign and russians before the campaign. there is a lot of smoke in those issues. what we want to do first is go through the documents. we are starting interviews next week with some of the intelligence analysts who created those documents. and then, we will get to some of the names being bandied about, pe

it is a simple thing to do. it, let's see how long it will take you have national strength up to staff the nhs that we need, and let's see the gap in between. that is the reality. these stories are important but they don't move a long, they don't get us anywhere. there is an urgency about this. it seems as if eu nationals in the nhs are going home more than in the nhs are going home more than in the past. they are giving up. thinking they won't have a future in the nhs. it is interesting. all of the nhs. it is interesting. all of the debate about eu migrants has focused on hospitality. their biggest contribution is to the nhs. exactly. it makes you wonder why this simple modelling isn't done. why are people debating something thatis why are people debating something that is easy to do? we can find out the gap. we can make a policy about the gap. we can make a policy about the gap. we can make a policy about the gap. it could be part of the negotiations. everyone throwing up their hands saying it will be horrible.

. >> i can see what had someone has to do to get on your board? >> i never thought of you as a government guy. public sector, how's the transition gone? >> the missions are similar. the private sector is trying to serve it's kind , trying to achieve its objectives and its goal . and the public sector is doing the same . is trying to achieve their mission, understand where the objective is and understandable. it's just a lot more difficult to get there. and the process is a lot slower and adapting to this slower process. >> i see you as someone who likes to execute quickly and well so let's just start with the hundred thousand foot level and that is your policy , your questions about water priorities and what you want to achieve. you're close to 100 day mark. lots of expectations but i think it gets a bad rap, it's stuff to do things quickly as you said so tell me where we are at the 100 day mark and what your agenda and what you see the next few months. >> agenda hasn't changed. when we came in day one we talked about an agenda that revolved aroun

the question is do we want to increase that? listen -- >> also do we want to go to war against another -- i mean the point here should be clear, right, that we have not been striking assad as shadi has said. we've been going after isis, which in a perverse way, many people argue, has been aiding assad. in fact, many people think that the american policy thus far has been essentially to maintain the status quo. >> well, the original idea was that so long as there was a non-jihadi rebel force, that we could support those people and then push towards a negotiated settlement. unfortunately because of inaction of the obama administration, that force, that middle ground force, has really been very much decimated. but to the point, i do think that if we're going to make a military action, if we're going to do something more than what obama was accused of doing back in 2013, pin pricks, that we should come up with a coherent strategy to wrap around that. >> right. >> president oma did lose his nerve. what triggered him to lose his nerve

our job is to do what we said we would do. this has probably been the central domestic policy in the past six years. the elections were about this issue. let's get it right. back to the process., when you hide the bill away, rolled out, don't have any real hearings, tell us it's a binary choice, try to push it through, that maybe explains why no one likes it. let's do that a little better at work this out and we will get there in the thing i'm told, it would be, i think it's important we get the process right and establish the template as we move forward. think about what's coming. we have a budget and a reconciliation in the appropriations process and infrastructure bill and some think it will be rolled into one bill before september 30 and then we have a debt ceiling. that is a lot of big issues. in a normal session you have one or two big moments. that is six over the next seven months. let's get the process and template right for how we will deal with all of these big things moving forward. then we have a better chance to d

let me determine how i want to do it. t means i have to put more state dollars on the table, i'll consider it because at least i can cover the populations that i want to cover. so i know there's a big federalism discussion here that's happening, and we're bouncing around a funding piece of this because that largely drives this conversation, but i do want it to be heard that a lot of people at the state level don't think it's actually that flexible of a process. even though they can ask for a lot, it just takes a long time. >> well, the waiver process is different from the process for asking for -- for not even having to ask, for indicating which options you want to adopt in the medicaid program. and there's multiple options in terms of the benefits that are provided, like what kinds of -- how you want to design your delivery systems. when we're talking about these waivers that take time and have to be requested, it's because you're asking to change the law, essentially. you're asking for permission to do something that is

and that's what i tried to do. i visit community centers, schools, public and private, in all kinds and neighborhoods, rich and poor. i don't limit myself. i go to mental health medical facilities. i try to reach out to as adverse a group of people and experiences as i humanly can. now, today i spend the day really talking with but at you, you know, having a conversation with a 2000 people is nearly impossible, okay? but in a lot of these settings, and listening to what's moving people, what they're doing, what the issues are that concerned them, i learn. and is the only way that anyone who smoke from their home environment can stay connected. now, i've often they asked what i think my greatest accomplishment in life has been. and i think that it's that i have not traveled my success -- my road to success alone. my family has been beside me every step of the way. every member of my family has visited every institution i have inhabited. my mother, my cousins, my grandmother when she was still alive had visited my gra

we have some work to do. when our hemisphere, you are right, we are looking to strappen the las, having some ideas how we can make it relevant. the interesting point of our hemisphere is almost every country in our hemisphere are democratic countries. we have a couple of exceptions, make no mistake about it. in those exceptions, corruption is widespread. venezuela is close to a failed state. i'm meeting with the opposition people today from venezuela to see what we can do. the courts and government have ignored the elections, and the economy is falling apart, and is extremely corrupt, and we have to deal with that in relation to a failed democracy. invoking the charter is appropriate. of course cuba is not a democratic country, i would never suggest it is. and they have widespread corruption in cuba, we have to deal with that. but i was with the foreign minister of mexico yesterday. that's a democratic country. they're fighting corruption. in some cases they're winning, in other cases they're not. the northern

they want to do has no legitimacy, then all you are doing is talking past each other and you will never come to the same table and will remain divided because if your attitude is whatever you say is just plain stupid or wrong, how are they going to respond to you? you are stupid and wrong. and you don't get much further. and so for me, that sense of engaging people, on their terms, on their needs, and moving those things closer to what i need has always been a successful way of negotiating. i give an example, and it is a very small example. when i was a judge on the district court, i had a group of 11 plaintiffs who were people of color who had been fired from a company that was downsizing. and as is regrettably all too common, they were the first in and last out. the company was firing on seniority. and all of the people that that affected were the people of color because they had been the last one hired in those companies. they sued claiming race discrimination in the decision that was made and its conseq

but you got to do something. (men yelling) >> we have some inmates that are incredibly dangerous, but even those inmates, we got to work with them. we've been able to reduce our segregation population by 50%. we've saved about a million dollars a year. i'm very confident that this process is going to work. and obviously, if there's any negative outcome, we're going to look at the negative outcome. but frankly, i'm absolutely convinced that what we're doing is going to work. and it is working. >> state police have formally charged a maine state prison inmate with murdering another inmate. >> the police say richard stahursky took two makeshift knives and stabbed a convicted child molester. >> how is it possible a murder can go unnoticed-- an inmate, beaten, tied up, and stabbed 87 times... >> investigators say stahursky used a piece of metal bedframe as a makeshift knife. >> i've been locked up a little over 14 years and i've been in seg a little over 12. what does that tell you? i did six years in seg. you know wha

quality stuff, didn't want to do something because a producer begged you to do it to get a quick hiteen true to who you are, and your artistically. what makes a great song? great song writers, like smoky robinson, what to them makes a great song. you are an interpreter of the song book. >> the best example is, a composure by the name of irving berlin. he knew how to do it. every time he wrote a song, it was simple, and profound at the same time. very lasting. you never get tired of hearing a great irving berlin song. >> simple, profound and lasting. part of the ingredients of a great song for you. >> you had a lot of collaborations. you have been hanging out with lady gaga. the white house. >> she is wonderful. >> you have collaborated with so many. what is it about collaborations that you enjoy? it is the individual talents. certain people have. they knew how to do it. lady gaga, she doesn't even realize to this day how great she really s i think she will be around for a long time. i think she will do very well in films, she is a wonderful person, very honest. and very educated. she

similar to what medicare is doing. so all of those things -- a tremendous amount of innovation that is taking place over the last years, and a lot of that has been, you know, facilitated by the states being able to get some upfront federal dollars to allow them to improve their delivery system, set up better means of coordinating across providers, integration of behavioral and mental health services. all of that including delivery for people with substance abuse disorders. thought is what would be add risk if the federal matching system is changed to a capped funding stream. we'd be down to paying for doctors and hospitals. >> so josh, what is it that some republican governors are looking for to do with waivers moving forward now? >> yeah, so i think this gets at a bigger issue about medicaid. is it health insurance or is it a welfare program? and depending on how you answer that question is how you think about how you design it. and so you have a lot of republican governors, in particularly, you have some democrats, go

doing the work they need to be doing? the security council all came together on it. -- the whole focus at the end of the day will be the people on the ground in need and to the reason the peacekeeping mission was started in the first place. i think it was a great effort. i hope every peacekeeping mission can work in that direction. hi, edie. >> thank you, madam ambassador. on the human rights issue, there has been a lot of media this weekend on the fact that the administration is leaving human rights out of meeting on bahrain, on egypt, on other issues. so it seems sort of strange and interesting that you are here in the u.n. pushing human rights at a time that the administration seems to be backing away. i wonder if you could comment on that? ambassador haley: i don't think the administration is backing away from human rights because they fully support me speaking on human rights at the security council. what you can look at is with every conflict, there are a lot of different elements. our number one priority -- i'm spea

why don't they want to turn it over? they do this to try to hide it, they want to put forward a false narrative so they can have people come out and march. saying that the earth is going to be over and everyone can get upset. >> dana, i do admit that we -- i call myself a critic -- make it easier for people like bill nye when you say it is a hoax. when you pick the other side, the other polarity or option rather than saying maybe there's something there but let's look at the facts. >> we don't know exactly what it is, we don't know how to solve it but we do think there is some x, y, and z things here to try and help and mitigate the effects. what's interesting is that in the next 100 days after this first 100 days, the white house is going to have to decide whether or not they will continue with the parents climate agreement that president obama signed us up for. there's internal debate in the white house and that will be interesting to see if he can do what you are talking about, taking us out and is there a middle way? >> yes,

doesn't tell the voters what we are going to do. and that's what we are focused and looking to make this bill much more consistent that we told the american people we were going to do when we were elected on november 8. and until we get a solution that accomplishes and moves thing in that direction. >> let me read you some tweets. i know you guys have read them. quote, the republican house freedom caucus was able to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. the freedom caucus will hurt the entire republican agenda if they don't get on the team. we must fight them and dems in 2018. mr. jordan: we held up a bill -- even mericans congress should be able to do han a 17% approval rating. mr. meadows: i think it is less than that. r. jordan: so, look we are trying -- i said this all the time, our job is to do what we told our voters and this is the central domestic policy. was 123, 2014 and 2016, the most important issue. let's get it right. and back to the process point. when you roll the bill out and don't have any hearings or witnesses an

i want to be clear, we still have more work to do. but the palmer-schweikert amendment, by allocating funds to a risk sharing program, will lower premiums for the american people. this is an improvement on our bill that will help the american people to bring us closer to repeal obamacare and replace it with something much better. the work through all three committees has been tremendous and our chairmen have led the way. in doing so, they have found working with other elements and everybody throughout this conference that there are a lot of great ideas on how we can improve it, but i want to thank chairman walden and chairman brady for their continued work throughout their committees and i want to bring up, right now, mr. palmer. mr. palmer: thank you. i want to say how encouraged i am with the progress we are making on this bill and what we are trying to do is keep our promise to the american people that we want to bring down premiums and make sure we take care of people with pre-existing patients best conditions, and i believe we do

it took a lot of us there to be able sure they do that. a very simple thing but really goes to show the impact that young people can have in these communities. president obama: now, ramuel, you were going to say something but your service in the military is an example of public service that i think thankfully everybody now appreciates. that wasn't always the case. obviously discovered was once our veterans take off the uniform, they leave service, sometimes people forget how much talent is there and the need to tap into the amazing young people that have served in our military so they can work in the community and continue the leadership that they've shown while they were in the military. you've been able to make that transition but talk a little bit about your mind set both when you went into the military and after you left, how did that change your perception in terms of your responsibilities to your community and how you might be able to make a difference. ramuel: well, when i joined the military, i joined six months out of high school.

do you subscribe to that? do you believe that? >> here's part of the thing that we've got to think through. number 1 do, they pay for themselves in the long run. i'm talking to you from the state of illinois, which is no stranger to you in terms of physical disaster and avoidance behavior. the other question is, do we want permanent tax policy or do we want a tax policy that will expire in ten years? if we're trying to influence business behavior, which we are, if we wants people to resure their corporate interests here in the united states, do we think they will do that in a tax code that expires in ten years? let's is not start out at the notion of throwing the towel in on revenue neutrality. we can have in pay for itself. we can have growth, deal with the tax base, the erosion of the tax base and we can have a permanent tax code. >> neil: but you have to give on something. either scale back some tax breaks that are popular today like for state local taxes. would you be open to that? >> the blueprint -- the house blue print puts

the government has tried to do things. to government always tries limit access and when you do that people that want to do drugs are going to get their drugs. all you do is raise the black market or the legal market of the drugs when you decrease it and you also get people to actually need these medications caught in the net also. you have people suffering big-time right now because they have exhausted all things. that actually do need pills to get by and have any kind of life , but because the doctors are so afraid they will get prosecuted, get their license revoked, they will not write it. it is a problem. the issue here is better education and also exposing people to alternatives. there are many. there are so many alternatives, no one should be in pain, really, and people do not even know about the multitude of things you can do to get out of pain because it is not profitable for the pharmaceutical industry. >> you are pointing to -- i agree completely. people will get their drugs and at the schaeffer center, if you look

i still don't want you to do it. that is an honorable position what has happened because this is become so controversial we have made it so politically dangerous and legally challenging to detain that we don't. we kill. i have more fingers of his hand and people that we have actually detained outside of battlefield like iraq. if you talk to the folks in the administration they will type if we could capture we would capture. some people is with some experience in government here. if they are politically challenging or dangerous. frankly because of the great controversy of this. we have just gotten too skittish were over here pulling the trigger. is not immoral it just doesn't create much intelligence. >> may be in enhanced interrogation might help. in all seriousness i would ask about the privacy because the look gifted do that. in the same way americans we want a lot of conveniences so we kind of have them and have the security that you need without people being able to see things. it kind of feels like it's a bit of

to success. i'm wondering what more do you think needs to be done on the opposite side of that? on the hiring side? they had something like 30,000 openings. some have been excerpted from president trump's hiring freeze. what more do you think you guys need to do on the hill to be able to do that? rep. roe: i think funding quality people. the v.a. has over 150 major medical centers. they are providing care for our veterans. these are highly sophisticated medical centers. , a couple thousand or more employees. just this coming week tomorrow on monday i will be in los angeles. and then in phoenix to go to the v.a. medical centers and be preached out there. center for thel she started three years ago has had seven directors and three years. i'm those qualified people that i think dr. shogun is to go for this incredibly long process and say here is a good person, they are qualified. let's hire them. i think that expedited process needs to be done and quickly. this bill gives them the ability to do that. kellie from cq roll call? kellie: i would like to talk to you about the v.a. choic

dickerson: today on "face the nation", as he hits the 100 day milestone, president trump adds more to his to do list, and takes a couple of victory laps. we intent the day with him. >> the president of the united states of america. president trump. >> dickerson: it was back to the comfort of the campaign rally for the president as he marked his 100th day in office. but before that celebration among the diehard support in other words harrisburg, pennsylvania we sat down with the president at the white house for a wide-ranging interview. everything from the north korea threat -- >> i would not be happy if he does a nuclear testily not be happy. >> not happy mean military action? >> i don't know, i mean we willi see. >> dickerson: what he thinks of his new job. >> i love doing it. you know, i am thoroughly enjoying it. it is always a challenge like life itself is a challenge, but it is something that i really love and i think i have done a very good job at it. >> next weñr traveled with him o a factory where he signed the 32nd executive order of his presidency and said hi to some supporters. >> we

this is the place to do that. and these are serious issues we have had with the chinese for a long time. i think the uncertainty, in my mind, is what the trump administration objective is going to be. if you talk to the american business community about what their problems are in china, they won't tell you that their problems are the bilateral deficit. they'll tell you that their problem really is technology transfer. legal, illegal, licit, illicit, pressured or not. they're under all kinds of pressure of various sorts to surrender what they regard as the crown jewels of their competitiveness. that's what they're most upset about, along with restrictions on their ability to do business there in various forms and also restrictions on their ability to invest there, which is something presumably what a b.i.t. would address. what's not clear to me is whether this is -- these are going to end up being trump administration objectives in the 100-day plan. if they listen to the american business community, that should be t

but what are you going to do for us? >> if they know that you're a sex offender or something else of that nature, then they will charge you rent to live here. >> i pay rent by them giving me a list of canteen items that they wanted me to order for them. it was $25 a month. >> but it didn't stop there. on the day before the super bowl, laudone says he sent an underling, inmate jason wright to his cell with another order, to hide a batch of hooch, inmate-made alcohol. >> so i panicked when i had to do something illegal. even though i was told and forced to do it. i said no. i'm trying to make a stand. saying, you know, this is it. they came back down and says you got to do this. it's not an option. when i said no again, you know, got beat up. it was almost like the straw that just broke me. so i said, okay, i'll do it. >> but the next morning laudone turned the hooch into officers and told them he was being extorted by wright and holloman. >> a lot of sex offenders know who i am. they know that these cos think i have a lot

you would have to factor in what other countries will do in response to this thing. you have this new tax which is a value-added tax or we don't get tax cuts. do the tax cuts. $100 billion a year over 10 years it's ridiculous that we can't do that to get this country moving. trish: the american worker is getting left behind. we need to stimulate the economy. that's the goal of this in part. to sometime slate domestic activity. is there a way to do this where we can penalize in some way, shape or form companies using ese resoces from abroad whe warding ourselv. steve: bmw is going to be turning out 300,000 cars in south america. why are we going to muck these supply chains up? you don't have to do it. a little bit of spend restrainltd in washington will go a long way. gary: thanks for joining us. trish: that does it for us on trish: that does it for us on "wall street week." i use what's already inside me to reach my goals. so i liked when my doctor told me that i may reach my blood sugar and a1c goals by activating what's within me with once-weekly trulicity. trulici

you're not going to do it here. >> i'd rather do it here. >> it's not going to happen.t the way it works. >> why are you going to put me back -- >> because you're on suicide watch because mental health deemed that you need to be here. this isn't long-term housing. you can't be on -- >> i'd rather be in here. >> i know but it's not going to happen. it's not going to happen. who's responsible for your actions? they can't make you do something, you have to do it and then there's consequences. you know how it is to be a short-timer. that every little thing can set you off because it's jeopardizing you going home. yeah. >> all right. >> yeah. we used to call it short [ bleep ]. >> there's a lot of high anxiety and i'm not going to say that there's not. >> right. so then you just have to abide by the rules, do what you need to do to earn your good time, and get out. >> on a weekly basis i go through all of the facilities and visit with the inmates to see if there's any needs that they have that haven't been addressed through the regular line staff. >> i hear. let them open th

to do it. >> you don't need to do it. sir are you aware that sean spicer said that with the new administration that now finally the president wanted to take the shackles off individuals in this agency? are you familiar with that? >> no. >> are you familiar with brandon judd who testified before our committee in response to a question from senator daines said that now that we can take the handcuffs off of us and put the handcuffs on the criminals. are you aware of that? >> no. >> are you aware of that. >> was that a recent hearing. >> yes, it was. are you wire are ware that david lappen your spokesperson said yesterday to the "washington post" that immigration agents may arrest witnessensance at courthouses >> yes angle are you willing to exempt victims and witnesses who do not have serious criminal backgrounds from that policy. >> every case is different. and we -- as they -- as the agents do their work of course the people that are taken into custody are put into a legal justice system. so that's where the decision would

one of the going to do? go back to doing whatever they are doing a four. that is why we have high recidivism rates. we need to ask ourselves, are they part of the human capital also? the answer is yes. should we be turning to develop them also and providing an opportunity to change the trajectory of their lives that they can become part of the engine and not part of the loan? of course we should. and when we start thinking about that in all of the different ways and stop allowing ourselves to be manipulated and divided. divide and a house divided cannot stand. let's figure oh what we can do to work together to get this done. thank you very much. [applause] >> before you go, not a question, but we are pleased that you are doing the listening tour that you are, and engaging so many people throw the country. we wanted to offer you a list of suggested stops from our state partners, the resident organizations here in this room, that would welcome a chance to welcome you to their communities. dr. carson: you are keeping me busy so i can't get under trouble. thank

it is the easy thing to do, to do the right thing. i don't know that i struggle a lot. there have been times when we have had to make decisions about finances. our main approach to finances is to live well within our means, and then you don't have to worry about it so much. we've been very blessed. judges and senators -- we get paid adequately for our work. we have had opportunities where we could have done something, beingow, when tim left governor he got offered a job by one of the big law firms in town that would have paid triple anything he had ever made. basically, he was serving as the democratic national committee chair at the time, but that could have been a part-time job. they said, you don't have to do anything for us, we just want your name on our roster and we will pay you this money for doing nothing and if and when your time as dnc chair is done, then you can work for us in a more active way. they basically wanted him to call his friend, the president. it would not have been illegal, but it did not feel right. it was not really a hard decision. and wee our

paying their rent in full they knew they had to do that. whatever they had had left with the money they had to live on until their next paycheck. they they were happy in the knowledge that of what they're getting and what the cost. they knew the bills would be paid immediately. if they had deposited that same tech in their bank account and then written tax or gotten on line to pay their bills, it would've been hard for them to be certain that those bills with their account after the tech had cleared. one of the biggest complaints from people is that they put their tech into their account and they didn't know it would clear when it would clear. then they had to face a late fee but they needed to buy food for their families over the weekend. it was an expensive decision but it was a logical one. >> in the book you talk about a situation where a customer is unable to make the 20-dollar payment and how you soft piping response from the establishment. >> that the story i told a woman named martha, puerto rican in her 50s and and she came in regul

you do this because we want you to do it and you need to do it. that's one reason why an i'm pessimistic about an outcome. that's why i am -- why i pessimistic about an outcome. am i don't think, what are we going to give them? that's why i think these are going to end up being much work difficult negotiations than people think. i don't think the trump administration is prepared to make many concessions. i think they believe we have been making concessions for 20 years and it's time to right the balance and they expect the , chinese to give and not take which i think is not a very , realistic view but that's where this is going. >> you did point out last year that the chinese did in the first approximation offer concessions on the beef imports, u.s. exports in beef. in that case even though they , haven't put into action any of the particulars. >> maybe you knew it? was there a deal in september on the beef or did they just do it? i think they do that you know --s unilaterally unilaterally. there were certain risks. it was way beyond the point wher

i have no idea how, or where or what i was going to be doing. i worked first two payoffs and student loans, and then i went to work at the city college of new york on their harlem campus with some student organizing. then there were a group of churches on the south side who tried to deal with the steel plant that had closed in the area. the economic station that had been taking place but also the racial tensions and turnover that was happening in these communities. so they formed an organization. they hired me as what was called a community organizer. i did not really know what that meant. or how to do it. but i accepted the job and for the next three years i lived right here in hyde park but i worked further south in communities like roseland and west pullman. working class neighborhoods. many of which had changed rapidly from white to black in the late 1960's, 1970's. and full of wonderful people who were proud of their communities, proud of the steps they had taken to try to move into the middle class, but were also worried about their futures

i was yet to do a documentary film. i always wanted to, but it needed to be a particular subject matter that was of interest to me. by happenstance, i met greg him and, come on, 70% of americans are on drugs. everybody in this room knows somebody who has taken prescription medication, if you are not yourselves on something. we just are, we are a heavily medicated society. as a filmmaker, it is one thing to do a documentary about an issue that is important, and i look at several factors. interesting most was the cultural application to it. we, as americans, as a cultural phenomenon. we live a very fast-paced lifestyle. we are a first world technologically advanced nation that thinks that we can have some type of either technological or medical fix. that is just the way we are. me to thislly drew subject. i sort of put on my investigatory hat. it is different when you write a narrative or you are directing a screenplay. you have the story there. it sort of goes in certain directions. when you are filming a documentary, you

be tougher to get across the border? do think that contributes? >> absolutely, and some of the other things we've done on the bord border. general sessions was just down there, the attention being paid to the border. it certainly has injected into those people and a vast majority of them are people from south america. it's brought confusion into their minds and it's waiting to see exactly what does happen. >> you as head of southcom, your previous job before this, you were testifying on this during the surge of immigration through mexico. you said, hey, i stop at the guatemalan border there, your purview. but you talked about the difficulty -- you were trying to find partners at the time in central america to help you with this, and the u.s. drug consumption, the u.s.rug consumer, you thought, was part of the problem in all of this. explain. >> drug consumption in the united states is the problem. just cocaine alone. when you consider the massive amounts of profit that come out of the united states. the traffickers' biggest

to capital. i'm glad we're not overrun. i do want to bring to your anticipation, i have recently learned that there have been some concerns regarding the quality of the ongoing construction at the facility at j.b., at jefferson barracks, and we have been in contact with the v.a. i.t. about this, and we have been assured they are looking into it. are you aware of any of these concerns about integrity and quality of the construction that's ongoing there? i know it's not your direct responsibility, but are you aware of any problems? have they been brought to your attention? >> just recently, actually working with your staff in preparing for this, became aware of some. but i can tell you what, we've had a very good relationship from the facility. in fact, we have a them a works for the medical -- a team that works for the medical certain, so works for my office thatce interfaces, and that's their full job, is to interface with the construction folks in central office for v.a. and our project is managed by the v.a. office of construc

it.yone else has to do they even want to. so these monuments canopy in coordination with any other agency. what i have said in the past is true -- you have to do the negotiation. the work on these things are done in the dark. you cannot find out what will happen ahead of time. sprunghe announcement is on people. that's a horrible way of doing business. if we could just modernize the antiquities act to allow the president to go through a streamlined process so he gets that kind of input from those other agencies, we would have a much better process. a minimum to get the kind of input is what we need to do with the antiquities act. >> your committee has jurisdiction over puerto rico. we know that funding efforts, medicaid reimbursement for puerto rico has been one of the major sticking points in the cost. the president said allowing this funding would amount to a bailout. do you agree with that? how do you think this should be addressed in the spending negotiation? be one ofp: it will those areas that only tangentially goes thr

to. in some small numbers we do. we don't send them to a place to be forensically taken apart and -- >> unfortunately, publicizing this, does make it less effective. unfortunately. senator hope has allowed the chairman of armed services to slide in. >> do you know what sets my hair on fire? the fact that we know that coming out of raqqah are people that have been directed to come and get into the united states of america and commit acts of terror, isn't that true? >> yes, sir. >> that sets my hair on fire. does it set our hair on fire that there are now we know published reports, there are efforts at taking these devices and implanting explosives and committing acts of terror with this technology? does that set your hair on fire? >> it does, senator. >> and there are developing technology right now to put -- one of the reasons why there's been some of the ban on what can be brought on an airliner sets my hair on fire right now. so i'm really worried about offending every ambassador in washington. that's what always be

and they said it's back to doing the cleaning. get back to where she left off in the house. i find that quite upsetting. tuesday and lesley have had some therapy in the past but say it did not work for them. could the correct level of therapy be the key to freedom from their 0cd bully? here's the thing. wales has a shortage of accredited cbt therapists. in england, they have three times as many per head. people with mental health problems in wales are being done a disservice. i think england has worked hard to get the thing right — it isn't perfect. wales isjust waking up now, just about now some people are starting to say that we need more therapists. it's just starting to seep into the culture that we must do that. ten years ago in england, around £200 million was spent training more therapists. there are signs things are changing in wales as well. so, many of you will work with people who have 0cd. this course at cardiff university is a step in the right direction but it is the only one of its level in wales. it will take more