yes, tom freeman, it's frightening.every one of them joined the mob of sensors, hysterics, and jacobin destroyers working on the health of entrenched power to take care control of everything. new ideas that this channel should be -- they're not arguing fox news is t inaccurate. they're arguing you should not be able to watch fox news because they should be limited by force. a few days ago, former "new york times" columnist posted this question on twitter. "should fox news be allowed to exist?" no, he quickly concluded. fox news "should not be legal." no one on line seemed especially surprised by this view, among a certain group it's a gathering consensus. cnn certainly agrees with it. cnn is our direct competitor of course. you might imagine they would recuse themselves from this conversation. oh, but the opposite. cnn and staring down the barrel of some pretty lean years ratings wise. the reason for existing has departed from mar-a-lago, they would love one less news channel on the dial. over the weekend, the dwarf kin