tom garrett, very good seeing you. >> wonderful seeing you. hope to talk soon. >> neil: meantime, susan is here as the republicans return to capitol hill. when i was reading the 20 that did not vote for this, the 20 republicans that voted no, they were not invited to the white house. what did you make of that and what signal do you think the president is sending for future pieces of legislation? >> he takes a hard line with even members of his own party that don't work with him. remember a few weeks back when he tweeted about the freedom caucus. it's not terribly surprising -- i'm not sure they would want to go to the white house since they didn't vote for the bill, but this doesn't preclude them from working with him in the future. he takes a stick and carrot approach. and it worked. >> neil: right. it started with the freedom caucus. he was upset with them but he worked with them, mark meadows and the gang. they voted for this. so there might be a lesson learned. the president has his wind at the back of a partial victory. it's a long way fr

admit they did not read the entire legislation before voting yes, including virginia representative tom garrett. an update on the texas police officer fired after killing a 15-year-old boy. roy oliver was briefly suspended in 2013 following a complaint about his conduct while serving as a witness in a drunk driving case. he was ordered to take training courses in anger management. he opened fire at a car leaving a house party in the dallas area , killing a high school freshman jordan edwards with no charges filed so far but oliver has been fired. delta airlines says it is sorry for kicking a family often overbooked flight. the airline is offering refunds and compensation to the family after they were forced off of a plane. they were threatened to be thrown in jail for refusing to give up their two-year-old baby 's seek. it was caught on camera and congress is intervening, looking at several bills looking to overhaul airline policies hoping no family has to go through this. lot of families. -- the skies for a lot of families. doug: heavy room -- heavy rain has moved out. maybe sunday afternoon,

tom garrett who said this on msnbc today. >> have you read the whole bill? >> oh, gosh. it this way. people's in my office have read all the parts of the bill. i don't think any individual has read the whole bill, but that's why we have staff. >> seth: that's right. your elected official didn't read the bill, but jonah did. [ light laughter ] even the basic question of how much the bill would cost has been a mystery to republicans. like texas congressman joe barton who said this last week. >> is this going to be a cheaper bill when everything is said and done if it passes, or a more expensive bill than obamacare? >> well, that's a very good question. the honest answer, greta, is that nobody really knows. >> seth: and when it comes to health care, i think all americans want the comfort of not knowing. [ light laughter ] am i covered for this life-saving procedure? why don't we do the operation now and i'll we'll tell you tomorrow? [ light laughter ] ooh, that sounds fun. so americans and mem o bill and the congressional budget office has not told us how much it costs. i j

congressman tom garrett has received so many death threats he now needs extra security when he goes to town hall meetings. congressman david cust awful literally was chased by a woman in her vehicle. of course, there will always be loonies, a lot of them in a country of 320 million people and political movements should not be judged solely by their violent outliers. that's fair. yet when every conservative speaker on campus as an excuse to riot when every trump riley is a chance to assault someone wearing a make america great again hat, when your party's elder states woman is famous for celebrating racial violence during the l.a. riots as maxine waters is, it's no longer a matter of outliers. something very different. what's the bigger side of danger in america? body slamming politician knocking a journalist down? that's bad. where this? we've even seen it on the show on the set. last week yet progressive activist, and his only objection to violence in a long conversation, his only objection to violence and politics is that it might be ineffective. watch this. is that a legitimate tact

here is republican tom garrett giving stephanie ruhle a very honest answer to the question of have youven read the bill? >> have you read the whole bill? >> oh, gosh, let's put hit the way. people in my office have read all the parts of the bill. i don't think any individual has read the whole bill. that's why we have staff. >> and that's true. most members of congress, most senators never reaany lls. that is why they have staff. and that is why most of them hate that question. >> congressman, have you read the bill yet? >> yeah, yeah. >> you have? >> thank you for the question. >> morning, gentlemen. have you read this bill congressman? >> we're in a hurry. we'll be back. >> have you read the bill that you're voting on today? did you read the bill? have you had a chance to read the bill? >> i'm finishing reading hit the morning. >> are you going to vote on it before reading it? >> absolutely not. >> as reported here last night, many democrats, especially in the leadership of congress were happy to see the bill pass the house of representatives today, as long as it does not pass the se

at the start of the broadcast, many lawmakers have even read the bill, that includes republican tom garrett, republican from virginia. i spoke to him earlier today. congressman garrett, obviously a very big win for house republicans and for the white house. you said yesterday "i don't think any individual has read the whole bill that's why we have staff." did you have a chance to read the bill before you voted for it? >> so we -- our shop read the entire bill. i think with the amendments we're looking at about 160 ballpark pages. i would be dishonest if i said i individually read it all, that's why we have a legislative staff but we discussed in the great depth. the goal we had was to create a paradigm in which we would see premiums and deductables go down. that's because as we discussed before, you can talk about beam coverage but if they can't pay their deductible, and statistics show most americans can't, then they don't have care. so the paradigm is about affordable care, not coverage. i think this will move us in that direction. >> your republican colleague in the senate lindsey graham

garrett, enjoy yourself down there. i saw you staying in new orleans last night. jealous, as always. joining me now, moving on from new orleans and my food jealousies, we'll talk to congressman tom reed, republican from new york. congressman, sorry i introduced you in such an awkward way, but we can move on to the news at hand. the republican health care plan, you voted yes for it. you got an earful at your own town hall and you'll be holding another in a couple of days. what do you plan on offering your constituents there that will ease their nds. >> obviously, there's still a lot of misinformation out there what the bill in the house does and what it represents when you read the text. so a lot of misinformation. so hopefully we'll have an exchange to clarify that. and the senate needs to act. the status quo of the collapsing marketplace is not acceptable and is not going to work for the american people. so i look forward to bringing back input for sharing with the senators. >> what specifically do you want to clarify to your voters that you think has been misinformation? >> well, i think the whole preexisting condition reform. i'm an adamant supporter of the preexisting condit