>> director tom mcguire. tom may not be available. i director hinze and not available but we can talk to our partners at the mayor's office of economic and workforce development. >> they do a program i know they set aside $500,000 my understanding is but depending on some of the new things that have come out they meet need as much as $5 million so will go into that i do know that there is a response. >> are there any additional questions before i open it up to public comments ? seeing not, moderator or their colors on the line? an opportunity for anyone listening in the may like to comment on the directors report, item number seven . all the questions and comments we made, if you are on the line and would like to this item press 1, zero. if you do bless one, zero. moderator on acolors in the line ? >> you have seven questions remaining. >> clerk: first speaker please. >> caller: this is joe, can everyone hear me? >> clerk: yes we can. >> caller: i appreciate director tumlin standing strong on this vaccine mandate. ihave a pal who is a

. >> chair preston: thank you, and up next, we have tom mcguire, director of sfmta's streets division. mr. mcguire, the floor is yours. >> good morning, supervisors, tom mcguire, director of streets for the sfmta, where among other things, i do oversee our capital projects and construction team, and thank you for -- thank you, kathleen, or whoever's running the slides. i'm going to give a quick overview of our response and more importantly some of the other going things that we're doing to improve project delivery at the sfmta, and obviously want to thank the civil grand jury. thank you for taking the time to talk about this, something that's really important to us. we know that we're not where we need to be. we know that there are some major capital projects in the city from which we have to draw some pretty hard and serious lessons. this hearing and this report is part of that learning, including the collaborative response that we got from our fellow partners, public works and p.u.c. in responding to this. so we welcome the feedback, and even though -- in the written response you go

>> director tom mcguire. tom may not be available. i director hinze and not available but we can talk to our partners at the mayor's office of economic and workforce development. >> they do a program i know they set aside $500,000 my understanding is but depending on some of the new things that have come out they meet need as much as $5 million so will go into that i do know that there is a response. >> are there any additional questions before i open it up to public comments ? seeing not, moderator or their colors on the line? an opportunity for anyone listening in the may like to comment on the directors report, item number seven . all the questions and comments we made, if you are on the line and would like to this item press 1, zero. if you do bless one, zero. moderator on acolors in the line ? >> you have seven questions remaining. >> clerk: first speaker please. >> caller: this is joe, can everyone hear me? >> clerk: yes we can. >> caller: i appreciate director tumlin standing strong on this vaccine mandate. ihave a pal who is a

and had an answer. >> tom mcguire, researcher. i believe mister toronto is referring to a regulation on special leavenworth street south, thatmost of us know that as part of the un plaza . there was an updated loading zone parked within the plaza and your action today will remove that and make it another state any time. which is probably the appropriate thing for a pedestrian law. >> thank you for clarifying that andmy apologize for not asking that before . we will move on to our next item. our consent calendar. >> clerk: that places you on item number 11, discussion on the 2022 muni agenda. >> chair: wehave mister kennedy speaking to us, director her spot has to be at the board of supervisors so welcome mister kennedy . >> good afternoon directors. sean kennedy, transfer letting manager at the sfmta and i'm excited to be here to talk about my favorite subject which is transit service. your director as someone has noted a number of times that both parking and transit fare revenue is down especially farebox recovery is 10 percent o

. >> chair preston: thank you, and up next, we have tom mcguire, director of sfmta's streets division. mr. mcguire, the floor is yours. >> good morning, supervisors, tom mcguire, director of streets for the sfmta, where among other things, i do oversee our capital projects and construction team, and thank you for -- thank you, kathleen, or whoever's running the slides. i'm going to give a quick overview of our response and more importantly some of the other going things that we're doing to improve project delivery at the sfmta, and obviously want to thank the civil grand jury. thank you for taking the time to talk about this, something that's really important to us. we know that we're not where we need to be. we know that there are some major capital projects in the city from which we have to draw some pretty hard and serious lessons. this hearing and this report is part of that learning, including the collaborative response that we got from our fellow partners, public works and p.u.c. in responding to this. so we welcome the feedback, and even though -- in the written response you go

and tom mcguire, who's our streets director is also sfraibl you want more detail on this. >> couldn't the pickup and drop-off function be done underground in the garage? >> yeah. so, as i hope you all know by now, the 10th avenue entrance to the park lees straight into the garage and the garage is free for 15 minutes to use it for front door pickup and dropoff at both deyoung and academy. this is a little-known secret and there is a very limited signage at the parking garage entrance off of fulton. and so one of the easiest solutions for expanding front door access from both the north as well as the south is to take better advantage of the enormous, mostly empty parking garage that is underneath the concourse. and there will be a lot of recommendations relative to the garage in the final report and hopefully that will go to the board of supervisors for legislative action. >> yeah. as i understand it, the garage has this very unusual governance structure. right? where, unlike a lot of other city garages, it's not managed by us. it's not managed by the museum either. is it the legacy of