western europe, tom paine declares all kings and princes, all of them, to be illegitimate and despotic and demands that all of them be swept away. paine denies the heritage of their noble bloodlines and -- them all as power-hungry ruffians who sit on thrones simply because an ancestor of theirs killed the previous dynasty of kings. he calls -- [inaudible] one of the most famous english kings of the previous century a bastard from france. which is pretty rude. now, as good americans, you're a few steps ahead of me, right? well, tom paine's not exactly lying, is he? monarchies, of course, do descend generation by generation from original acts of violence, insubordination and, yes, the histories of england, france and other european countries are littered with invasions and conquest quest -- conquests. and -- [inaudible] by an upstart young man who thinks he can do better. but so what if paine is technically correct about all this? remember, remember, in the 1770s when he's writing, kings and princes are all the rest of the world really knows. no one can yet imagine a realistic alternative to governing large countries and their growing empires. kings at least provide stab