it's time for us to come together as a country. >> all right congressman tom reed, thanks for joininglly >> and please keep us posted >> we will. >>> evan, turning to you here. we've heard on a potential new plan to kind of go back to the heart of the problem here. we've heard from molina on the ways that it's basically not able to deal with the unstable marketplaces we heard from aetna yesterday which has left it more or less entirely. >> if i would come up with one word that comes out of these discussions, and it's not -- it's not a new word. that's uncertainty, and if you're an individual with a policy through obamacare or the aca, if you are a ceo, that guy is the interim ceo, he's trying to run a company without any certainty over what the rules and regulations are going to be going forward, the subsidies, the structure. he knows nothing, and people -- >> businesses of all sizes are left trying to deal with what requirements are they going to have on the employer side even for providing health care. >> and when you have uncertainty, people get paralyzed and make bad decisions, an

it is tom reed, who has been on the program. what does this mean to you? >> they are supporting want the ,nsurance industry and many sabrina and i, for example, have said they will have to deal with. the various aspects, they are obviously talking about reductions, it is too much money to say it is not insurers. that it will not work. they talk about the stability fund, another name for what is probably a high cost risk death risk pool. money into thet system to cover the exceptional cost of people of serious health conditions who may not have been insured previously. they are talking about other adjustments meant to you -- appeal to republicans. they would change the employer mandate sewn that of requiring to offer coverage, raise that to 500. point and iicking am not sure it is a major real issue but it is ticking, a political point. they are willing to repeal the tax, 2.3% tax. this is probably more of a political issue than not. they are talking about letting states experiment more with insurance markets. basically talking about this provision in the a

joining me now is republican congressman tom reed of new york.ul to see you on this friday afternoon. let's get right into robert mueller and this russia investigation. he is making use of grand jury, what do you make of this new development so far. >> welcome, thanks for having me on. i see an investigation that is following the evidence, and if there is evidence that needs to be presented to the grand jury, i respect that process and i respect that's what is going on here. >> they are trying to make sure that the president cannot fire bob mueller? >> i understand where the president is coming from, but i think we're going to be in a situation where the investigation will take it's course based on the facts and the evidence. that to me is the most important issue, and i'm very confidence that the president will not terminate -- >> it is not theoretical, though. do you support the idea of making sure there are work arounds for congress to ensure that bob mueller has a chance to investigate this fully? >> i don't know, we're dealing with a special

tom reed / new york 1:08-1:18so obviously, they chose to leave that table. from my perspective, they'veunity to influence the agenda.and some say in the end trump's feud with powerful ceos won't mattermichael cohen / interim director of political management 1:23-1:29it will become white noise, this is one of the things you've seen throughout the campaign and into the early months of the presidency. where he essentially attacks people and it's a one day blip and then it goes away.in washington alexandra limon (grant) still reeliing from the violence in charlottesville.. congresswoman anna eshoo dropped by our kron 4 studios and talked to vicki liviakis. the interview actually got a little emotional. (grant) we've posted the full video with the congresswoman on our website. kron4-dot-com. tuesday...low clouds that spread well inland overnight have mostly retreated to the coast, aside from across san francisco and around the monterey bay region. with this, temperatures are generally running a few degrees warmer compared to this time yesterday. this slight warming trend is also a result of

with us is republican congressman tomorrow re congressman tom reed from new york. i want to ask you, three chiefs of industry, from merck, intel and underarmour have quit. you worked as a lawyer. a central new york for many years. what message do you think they're sending? >> obviously that's an individual choice. those ceos made. if you've going to influence the agenda, you have to be at the table, talking in the room. and pitching your vision as to how you want to go forward, and so obviously, they chose to leave that table. from my perspective, they've lost an opportunity to influence the agenda. >> so you think it's a mistake? >> i think it is a mistake. i understand the reason they articulate. you can protest or you can be part of effort to change the cu culture. that's what i try to do. >> i do want to talk to you about the problem solvers. i want to address the president's approval rating. a approval is a misnomer in this case. 34% approve. 61% disapprove. you've been in politics for a few years. would you be polileased with th numbers? >> polls are what the

so -- and i'll tell you, i know that tom reed, co-chair in the caucus with martha and others have heardphones are ringing off the hook people that want to jump in from both sides saying how do we be part of this? martha pointed out so right, it's about helping families, children, seniors. they all want center to know that tomorrow when they wake up they'll have coverage. they can't afford to have premiums keep going up. this stabilizes things, brings premiums down. what everybody is looking for on both sides of the aisle. nothing is perfect, building a consensus is never perfect. you won't get everything you want. that's the idea. we need to move forward and govern. >> heard from so many democrats, especially democratic leaders. they really want to fix, improve, repair obamacare as long as republicans don't insist on formal repeal, they want to work together. see if you guys can make that happen. representatives martha mcsally, josh gottheimer, thanks to you both for joining us. >> thanks, wolf. >>> coming up, jaw-dropping claims that the white house and fox news may have concoctsed a f

. >> tom reed is one of the members of the so-called problem solvers caucus. >> president trump has taken to bullying the repeal efforts and mocking the efforts to get this done. andld trump is doubling tripling down on this effort. it is difficult to see how something along these lines could gain traction while there a still this even if it's ill-fated effort, even a repeal effort going on. toublicans are going anticipate if they are trying to obamacare. >> it is called the bipartisan problem solvers caucus proposal to stabilize the individual market. bill,e senate republican a lot of groups are coming out against it. any early word on whether those groups would support something like this? >> i will give you one indication that maybe this could get more support from the health-care industry and that is for the former cms, senate medicare and medicaid administrator, the guy who was in charge of medicare and medicaid in the obama administration, he is -- i would not say on board with every proposal in this plan but is supportive of the effort and has said and encouraging words about it. h

tom reed is deeply involved in two of the major initiatives of the trump administration, serving on then the trade subcommittee that will be overseen changes made to nafta. we are minutes away from the start of this nafta negotiations in washington and we are joined by tom reed from new york. thank you very much for taking the time to be with us, sir. >> thank you for having me on. you thee have to ask question, given the news conference yesterday, how big a potential distraction is this discussion of hate groups on the president's position? is that a distraction that may interfere with your work on tax reform and nafta? >> i would not call it a distraction. it is an important issue that we are going to have to focus on and spent time having a conversation about across the nation, but that doesn't mean that we do not do the business of the people. the business now is getting our policies right for the american worker. david: i just have to ask you, do you agree with the president's view that there is blame shared equally coming out of charlottesville? representative read: -- rep. reed:

tom reed / new york 1:08-1:18so obviously, they chose to leave that table. from my perspective, they'vetunity to influence the agenda.and some say in the end trump's feud with powerful ceos won't mattermichael cohen / interim director of political management it will become white noise, this things you've seen throughout and into the early months of the presidency. essentially attacks people blip and then it goes away.in washington alexandra limon he was just doing his job. a san francisco police officer tells how he saved a man's life during steph curry's basketball game. and a one person is shot outside a san francisco store... by a security guard! what apparently led up to this confrontation. and the suspect accused of gunning down a south bay liquor store owner makes his first court appearance. what we about his past. (pam) we have new details about a shooting in san francisco. a kron four viewer took this picture across the street.. from where he saw the police cars converge ... at howard and fifth streets. we know a security guard shot at another man... who was a suspected shoplift

all of us work like that and works on diabetes with tom reed, john shimkus and i work on the next generation of antibiotics that we wanted to gain with the legislation going to the senate. we were trying to see how we could jumpstart that medical research into that new antibiotic resistant illnesses. the chairman burgess and i worked together on trauma care. we can do it. we just need to look at it. we did really great on cheers, but now with what's happened in the senate and i would hope we would do that really bipartisan on how we are going to provide healthcare to americans. >> some propose requiring pharmaceutical companies to explain their drug pricing models. is that something that would help the market? >> i think transparency is important, and although we also know, anyone who has a patent or they may nae want to share some of it so they could have a knock off, but think transparency in drug pricing so people will know. even if the physicians will know that win, if they have a rate of drugs for certain illnesses they would know this is the cost -- aand array. the goal would be to pre

republican congressman, tom reed and democratic congressman dan lapinski. good to have you here. reed, a star with you. you have heard me highlight some of the goals. tell us more about the first plan of attack. >> what we did is we came together. democrats and republicans said we can't do nothing in regards to healthcare. millions of americans are losing access to care, as we speak, with the barren counties across the country that don't have insurance carriers any longer and premiums are going up by 30-40%. we got together and said let's stabilize the marketplace to help leaders like dan lapinski on the other side. we had members who said 80% is a victory and let's put that together and you can get it done. arthel: do you agree? >> i completely agree. the american people are sick and tired of democrats and republicans fighting over healthcare. they want us to work together to find ways that we can make healthcare more affordable, accessible and that's what we did. tom did a great job leading on their public side and we are not going to grant everything. it doesn't solve every pr

debt selling hike, the president doesn't share that time to ask new york republican congressman tom reed whether he does. congressman, the sense i get not all republicans are on the same page on this issue of a potential government shutdown over this debt ceiling thing but that is led by the president of the united states. what do you think? >> no, i think we're, we obviously will have to take care of the debt ceiling and keep the government running, and neil, what i do believe is happening you will see the rise of governing members of in congress of house and senate on both sides of the aisle, willing to shed the shirts-skins game brought us to gridlock. work for the american people, that is who hired us, that who we work for and that the biggest opportunity i see the next 90 days. neil: do you think there should be a clean debt ceiling increase? >> i'm open to that, if we have a debt ceiling a serious conversation needs to be had what is causing the debt to go up, how can we fix it? maybe that is a sweet spot getting members together. i am not opposed to it, you need to recognize what

tom reed. >> thank you. stuart: thanks very much, tom. >>> gunmaker stern ruger way down.s. i guess people are buying fewer guns. liz: that's true. their profits were cut in half year-over-year. run-up to the election, polls show hillary clinton was going to win. so 2016 was a banner record year for gun sales. people raced out the door to buy guns. now they're talking, like american outdoors brands, and dick's sporting goods, people are talking about how the background checks are down, about 12% for the month of june, year-over-year. so the trend has been down for gun sales in first half of the year. so you know, maybe see more discounts on guns as they get gun sales up. stuart: political question. liz: yes it is. stuart: i should tell you in new jersey where there is gubernatorial race this november, both democrat and republican favor gun control. so the requests for gun-owning permits is up in new jersey because it is a politicized thing. liz: that is really interesting. so state by state, right? that's interesting. stuart: president trump unveils immigration plan. left-

tom reed / new york 1:08-1:18so obviously, they chose to leave that table. from my perspective, they'veopportunity to influence the agenda.and some say in the end trump's feud with powerful ceos won't mattermichael cohen / interim director of political management 1:23-1:29it will become white noise, this is one of the things you've seen throughout the campaign and into the early months of the presidency. where he essentially attacks people and it's a one day blip and then it goes away.in washington alexandra limon coming upyou never called me about the bite (what are you taking about i never called you) you never called me (what are you talking about) your dog bit somebody lets not get the dog agitated )he did not bite anyone no he did not sir) i going to introduce you to san francisco police departments vicious and dangerous dog unit in the next edition of people behaving badly (james)(robin) now lets get a check of weather with james fletcher. (james)like yesterday, it's cool this morning with temps mostly in the 50s. clouds and coastal drizzle are also in play this morning. skies sho

three votes to possibly uphold, v.i.n.son from kentucky, stanley reed from kentucky and tom clark from texas. two undecided frank further and jackson. who are in favor of judicial restraint, they are new deal democrats, but they don't think the courts should be stepping in here. so the initial vote is taken and looks like the segregation is going to win and then all of a sudden before the court can decide the case, vinson drops dead of a heart attack. so on the funeral train, on the way home from the funeral, it was said that this is the first indication i had there is a god. not a nice man, frankfurter. and it comes in and you probably want to wait to hear what happens. >> i do. first i want to get the attorneys on the docket for our viewers. the defendant attorneys included john davis, who has been in now three of our landmark cases. who was john davis and why was he at the helm in so many of these important cases? >> he was the presidential candidate, unsuccessful presidential candidate, turned one of the great appellate lawyers of his age, courtly, silver haired, fit. you can call

. >> tom costello, and joining me now is joy reed, our thanks to kristen welker there at trump tower. joy reed from "am joy" on weekend mornings on msnbc and national review senior writer david french joining us as well. joy and david, you both have been so eloquent on this subject. i wanted to bring in some -- part of a speech that i thought said so much. it was mitch landrieu in may after a statue was going to be taken down and explaining to the people of new orleans why a statue, a confederate statue was taken down there. i want to play a little bit of that and come to you both. >> these monuments that we took down were meant to rebrand the history of our city. and the ideals of the confederacy. it is self-evident that these men did not fight for the united states of america. they fought against it. these monuments were part of that terrorism. as much as burning a cross on someone's lawn. they were erected purposefully to send a strong message to all who walked in the shadows about who was still in charge in this city. i knew that taking down the monuments was going to be tough. wo

tom clark. and the minority chief justice vinson voted with the president who appointed him, justices stanley reedherman minton. so we're going to return to another oral argument. and this is from one of the other clerks. his name is george nybank and in an exchange between justices jackson and clark about their decision in this case. let's listen. >> after they announced the decision at that time tom clark sat on one side of jackson, probably on the left. and tom clark announced his concurrence. i don't remember whether he wrote an opinion or not. but jackson leaned over to him and whispered i'm glad to see that you've decided to be a judge, tom. now, jackson told me that. >> you reacted when you heard that. >> it's very interesting, yes. of course, jackson's talking about this from his own experience. he was attorney general under roosevelt. during which time he made some arguments very similar. same thing happened with korematsu. and, for jackson, it was very important to make a distinction in how he looked at the world as a political appointee, attorney general, and how he looked at world as a