defense attorney tom schafer and defense investigator ken kobersteen. >> in their mind, it's always theoyfriend or the husband. >> or the person who finds the body. >> which in this case -- >> was the husband and tom. >> they wanted me bad because what's easier for them, to go after someone that they can actually physically see or go after someone they cannot physically see? >> what's wrong with the idea that the money was a motive? >> absolutely not. i mean, we had a mortgage. to move on after all of this, it was going to take a hell of a lot more than that. >> after two weeks of testimony, the jury had its verdict. >> i felt that the evidence was going to prove that there's absolutely no way i had anything to do with this. >> 12 jurors didn't share that feeling. >> we, the jury, find the defendant guilty of first-degree murder. >> i was just -- what? i was just shocked. >> what was wrong with the jury? what do they know what i don't know? how could they convict a man on what they had? >> i knew what a conviction was meant for me, and for life without the possibility of parole. >> my s

conclusion of the mystery of heath bar farm, here again -- >> as he did in the first trial, attorney tom schaferpared to address the jury for what he and his client tom foley hoped would be the last time. when your defense rested, were you comfortable? >> yes. >> you thought you were going to win? >> very much, yes. >> you thought that once before. >> yes, i did. >> apparently the theory the prosecution is that if a marriage ever has a bump in the road then that is a motive for murder. is it reasonable? i suggest not. >> tom foley, he says, had nothing to do with dar's death, but those mysterious cars did. >> those cars should not have been there. and the prosecution has not given you any explanation why they were there because there is no other explanation other than they had some connection with the death of dar foley. ladies and gentlemen of the jury, i submit to you there's more than reasonable doubt. i respectfully ask you to find tom foley not guilty. >> then came prosecutor terri norris' turn, and she started by attacking the credibility of those witnesses who say they saw the cars. >> if