the skin around the guys are perennial and a science and the us is a guy like me to frisco for tom sharpe of them have to have broken the ten eighty vary a bit and three spins in the air on the last few years i'm one of the guys a dishonest or alex urgent and that he has come and is on a nice huge way and he's going to be a start. it can end at nine pm tonight here in our america. at the sofa now for more on the stories we covered go to youtube dot com splash park and they are kept in check and a website or t dot com slash usa you can also follow me on twitter and banging on the score. our team holds you back here at eight pm. thanks for watching the baby. if you don't. did you know the difference is the only industry specifically mentioned that's because a free and open price is critical to our democracy should out of it. oh well in fact the single greatest threat facing our nation today is the corporate takeover of our government and civic so we can hide change my handphone possible trans national corporations that profit by destroying our founding fathers. my job market and on the show

tom. >> they have to use sharp words right now, because honestly, nobody wants to see this turning into a shooting war. most of all, ukrainians. think about this. this is the border that russia has with ukraine on the land. all of this. all of these areas russia has easy access to ukraine with tanks, with artillery, whatever it wants. with troops. russia controls the sea. they have a much more extensive navy. so they also control all of this border and this is crimea down here, the part they already seem to have seized here. so what does this mean? it means that roughly 60% of the borders of ukraine are controlled by the russians. and let's talk about how much they control, because it is really quite vast. let's look at the military here. if you talk about their navies alone, because we have seen ships moving today. here are some numbers from globalfirepower.com. here's what they have. total number of ships in the ukrainian navy, 25. total number in the russian navy, 352. destroyers, zero. submarines, one. small craft, only two. over here, 13 destroyers, 63 submarines, 65 patrol craft.

. >>> my name is tom bennett and a golfer, [speaker not understood]. been on several trips with sharp golf club members. i'm here not to argue against sharp park, but for good environmental [speaker not understood]. for over 40 years or almost 30 years, 20 in the army and 20 at lawrence liver moore, conducted research materials, more familiar with conducting risk assessments and e-i-rs. that said, i want to point out that e-i-rs should be triggered when experts legitimately disagree over the impact of the environment. while that study has provided that evident in the past as well as what you've heard today. but during the planning commission's herebition, one of the commissioners said, i'm not a biologist, but i can't imagine anything new that an e-i-r would show. ask one of the staff member. they couldn't come up with anythingnessv. after that statement, he he voted against the e-i-r. the wrote et plan, in fact, section 2b that mr. potter talked about, i want to make a couple comments about that. in that it requires [speaker not understood] samplings analysis of water. and making rep

from the outside, that a craft, which could have been this flight, hit a sharp turn from its intended course towards the west. tom, do we have you there on the line? >> i'm here, ronan. >> thank you so much for joining us here. you have been in trenches and covering this issue. tell us what the various data sources from within the plane mean. which are the most reliable? and when you look at that path that the plane appears to have taken, what do you make of that fact? do you see deliberate sabotage. >> the only real datapoint we have from the plane at 1:21 in the morning is a blinking signal, which essentially was like a ping, telling a satellite i'm here, i'm here, i'm here. it was only one ping an hour. it did not transmit information about location, speed, none of that. it was literally as if you had xm sirius radio in the car and never added the subscription. it is there and satellite is saying are you interested? and you don't respond. now, the malaysian authorities and now u.s. authorities have looked at this data on the map which suggests according to radar that the plane did take that turn as you suggest

sharp turn to the west. the path was followed so perfectly, the pilots probably weren't steering that plane manually. but still a lot of confusion as to how this information was collected. tomn is joining us from our virtual studio to try to sort some of this out. >> the malaysian government keeps saying over and over again that a lot of the search right now is about data collection and analysis. so where is this data originating? we don't have any real answers with all of this, but we have a lot of ideas that are worth talking about here because it is such a mystery. every plane that's in the sky is emanating a tremendous amount of information about itself. largely through the acars system. most of the time that's going out through vhf radio when it's over land it goes through a radio tower. if it moves out over the water, if it's further out where it can't quite reach those land stations, then this plane will connect through a satellite and that satellite in turn will send that signal down to a ground station of some sort. now, what sort of information are they collecting? it may be information about how the engines are performing, about how much fuel is being burned or a