. >> nine years ago, tony blair left the job in a grand style with applause ringing out from all sidesn the commons. the idea obviously appealed to david cameron. he worked out how to bring to a close his tenure. the 30th of july saw his 182nd and final pmq's. prime minister cameron: mr. speaker i had meetings this , morning. other than one meeting this afternoon with her majesty the queen, the diary of the rest of my day is remarkably light. >> i have been watching five ime minister's and several ex-prime minister's. i have seen him achieving mastery of that dispatch box. unparalleled in my time. prime minister cameron: this session does have some admirers. i met mayor bloomberg in new york. everyone knew mike bloomberg. no one had a clue who i was until somebody said, cameron, prime minister's questions, we love your show. [laughter] >> mr. speaker, it is only right that after six years as prime minister, that we thank him for his service. i have often disagreed with him. >> jeremy corbyn praised recent remarks by theresa may. >> isn't she right that too many people in too many place

even tony blair, the prime minister who sided with george w. bush and committed forces to iraq, he was just interview on cnn and asked what you say to those who say that this invasion of iraq would ultimately to the formation of isis and he said, that is partly true. >> c-span: eagle back to the 9/11 situation, you are on the scene down there, was the happenstance that you're that close? >> guest: we are the closest national broadcaster ground zero. we operated out of a 100-year-old firehouse at the time. september 11, 2001 was election day, 2001 was election day new york. it was a primary day. we were doing the broadcast and we are in the -- we broadcast at 9:00 a.m. and now we broadcast at 8:00 a.m. but then at 9:00 a.m. at 8:47 a.m., the first plane hit the first tower. we do know what happened, we're just on the street we were within the evacuation zone. nine 9:03 a.m. the second plane hit. and in 1973, the day the salvador in chile died in the palace, sadly the. [inaudible] , he would ultimately take control of a 17 year reign, and killed

john: we have seen murdoch do this before with tony blair -- alex: fox was created to specifically bewhat was seen as liberal bias in the media. jim: there were stories about this during her senate campaign that there was some friendliness. i don't know because the fox audience, part of it loves trump. when megyn kelly fought with trump earlier this year, that was a problem with segments of their audience. it is intriguing and i would not rule it out, but they are running a business and need to keep their ratings. john: gawker is dead and there are so any eulogies that one of our millennial staffers has installed a gawker blocker. should we care? the new york culture, media culture, us in the business -- alex: the fourth estate. jim: even the fifth estate. we should care on two levels. gawker was part of the media culture, the modern iteration of spy magazine. it was a reverend -- it was irreverent and went too far. it offended me, sometimes a lot, but it stood for internet era journalism. but to me, much more importantly is that a billionaire put out of his is through lawsuits and pe

called the endeavor, a secular monastery, and among his part pants are former heads of state like tony blairire technologyists. nicholas, pleasure to have you on. >> thank you, fareed, slighted. . >> about ten years ago, you decided a point at which you had made enormous amounts of money, that you wanted to educate yourself about ideas, about philosophy, you've hired professors from ucla to tutor you. why were you doing that? >> it comes back to my teenage years, i was interested in politics and philosophy, because i really felt that ideas shaped two he are, and i still feel that way. so i went back to trying to learn what does the world of politics, and the world of ideas look like, but not just western, but also eastern. and that's why i spend time with these professors from ucla and that re-enforced my view that ideas make the world and they make also politics and by not only learning, but then by investing in the world of ideas, in the world of new ideas, i could not only learn something for me, but hopefully krib9. >> so you like many billionaires have pledged that you're going to give

called the endeavor a secular monestary and among the participants are former head of state like tony blairnd billionaire technologist elan musk. nicolas, pleasure to have you on. >> thank you, fareed, delighted. >> you decided that you wanted to educate yourself about ideas, about philosophy and you hired professors from ucla to tutor you. why were you doing that? >> it comes back to my teenage years. i was interested in politics and in philosophy because i really felt that ideas shaped who we are and i still feel that way. so i went back to trying to learn what in the world of politics and ideas looks like but not just western but also eastern and that's why i spend time with these professors from ucla and it reinforced my view that ideas make the world and they make also politics and by not only learning but then by investing in the world of ideas, in the world of new ideas, i could not only learn something for me but hopefully contribute. >> so now you, like many billionaires, have pledged that you are going to give away most of your money but what's unusual, you're giving away the vast

citizens united e-mails suggest chang greeting then prime minister tony blair, worked with another long time clinton aide, huma abedin, fund-raising events, objectives and major donors. chang sent this nine-page e-mail to prepare secretary clinton for a briefing on the 67 vips attending a foundation dinner. guests range from major real estate and business executives to former politicians and aid organizations. fox news asked the government accountability group fact to review the e-mails and dennis chang's role. >> he can best be described as the bag man, raised the money. you would expect -- i've always expected that mr. chang would be right in the middle of some of these transactions that were going on between the clinton foundation and their donors and ones that wanted access to the state department and secretary clinton. >> reporter: other documents seem to reinforce these allegations. 2012 e-mail, chang tells abedin he is traveling with clinton donors to little rock on a private jet and offers her a ride and it appears she does accept. in another exchange, bill clinton aide went to

and shortly after tony blair's government comes in in 97 you see a substantial surge, a very large surge of immigration into the u.k. and almost immediately you begin to get promises from politicians, first loiber then conservative, saying yes the numbers are too high, it's too rapid and we're having trouble providing schools and hospitals and housing. and yet the numbers continue to climb. and this happened for about 20 years. and over the course of that time promises were made by every political party and the consensus in british polling was about 80% that immigration was too high. almost a universal consensus. only on the very far left spectrum was there a rejection of the this consensus. so to the extent that immigration was a significant factor, i don't think it was a syrian issue, although i'm sure there were anxieties about the middle east. i think it was a reaction to almost 20 years of very high immigration coupled crucially with promises that were never kept by politicians from all parties that they wouldn't do something about it. well, if they had done something about it, perh

. >> when tony blair was leaving, he invited some of us to the british and secret to say goodbye. fair to say that america and great britain have agreed on most issues through our common history. there is also one issue that we did not agree upon. the north of ireland. he said i want to thank all of you for what you did to help bring others into the process. he was looking for is an reset through his career and he gets credit for that. think of it tonight. if we were sitting here 25 years ago, there were 35,000 british soldiers in an area the size of the state of connecticut in the north of ireland. the watchtowers were all over -- they were headed towards 35%. it's a huge accomplishment. there have been these broad reforms. >> now thoughts about where we are today and what you think the legacy of all this is. i don't think we have time. >> the night before gerry adams visa was crafted by president clinton, nancy called me in the middle of the night and said, what does jerry adams had to do with the bombing in san diego? and i said what are you talking about? there have been two b

and shortly after tony blair's government comes in in 1997, you of a substantial surge immigration into the u.k.. and almost immediately, you begin to get promises from politicians saying, yes, the numbers are too high. and yet the numbers continue to climb. and this happened for about 20 years. and over the course of that time , promises were made by it every political party and the consensus in british polling was about 80% the immigration was too high. almost a universal consensus. only on the very far left spectrum was there a rejection of the consensus. final think it was a syrian issue, although i am sure they anxieties about the middle east. i think it was a reaction to almost 20 years of very high immigration, coupled crucially with promises that were never cap why politicians from all parties that they want to do something about it. well, if they had done something about it, perhaps the referendum vote would have gone another way. but they didn't. and so, the referendum vote when the way it did. and the result is exactly how rory and ian laid out. people said, "you said you wer

deputy chief of protocol at state department where he greeted heads of state, british prime minister tony blair national finance director for clinton's presidential campaign. the new emails show how chang worked directly with long time clinton aid and fixer, huma abedin, seemingly shared information about the clinton foundation events and donors. they asked the government accountability to review the emails and dennis chang's role. >> he can be best described as the bagman. he is one raised money and kept the donors happy. so you would expect, and i have always expected that mr. chang would be right in the middle of some of these transactions that were going on between the clinton foundation and their disown norse and those that wanted access to the state department and secretary clinton. reporter: for context the ap fought with the state department over these calendars for three years, martha. martha: what was the response from hillary clinton's team on this, catherine? reporter: well this morning the campaign manager spoke to msnbc where he claimed the records are simply incomplete. >> by our

. >> i think when tony blair was leaving, he invited some of us to the british and secret to say -- british embassy to say goodbye. and he stood up and said, i think it's fair to say that america and great britain have agreed on most issues through our common history. but he said, there was one issue that we did not agree upon. the north of ireland. i want to thank all of you, he said, for what you did to help bring us into the process. to have a british prime minister say that -- and i probably caught another break, he was looking for a reset for his own career and he gets credit for that. think of it tonight. if we were sitting here 25 years ago, there were 35,000 british soldiers in an area the size of the state of connecticut in the north of ireland. the watchtowers were all over the place. and to nancy's point, 30% of the police service of northern ireland is now catholic, they were heading toward 45%. so it is a huge accomplishment. there have been these broad reforms. there are no problem -- there are problems, no question about it. there is a government representative of traditions

and shortly after tony blair's government comes in in 1997, you see a substantial surge, a very large surge of immigration into the u.k. and almost immediately you begin to get promises from politicians, first labour, then conservative, saying, yes, the numbers are too high, it's too rapid, and we're having trouble providing schools and hospitals and housing, and yet the numbers continued to climb. and this happened for about 20 years. and over the course of that time promises were made by every political party and the consensus in british polling was about 80% that immigration was too high, almost a universal consensus. only on the very far left spectrum was there a rejection of this consensus. so to the extent that immigration was a significant factor in the referendum vote, i don't think it was a syrian issue, although i'm sure there were anxieties about the middle east. i think it was a reaction to almost 20 years of very high immigration coupled crucially with promises that were never kept by politicians from all parties that they wouldn't do something about it. well, if they had