so this is tony blair. oh, is this a tony blair one? >> let's do let's go back to 11.e going to do the. no, let's. yes. sorry. >> i'm so confused. sorry. because i've got 1111. >> it's all going very. >> it's all going very. >> well 11 guardian but i thought i wanted to let ben do that one. >> i say let's are we going for the guardian. we're going to go stick with the guardian. >> the guardian. >> the guardian. >> okay. illegal among words most often linked to migrants in uk politics. report finds. so apparently illegal has been one of the most one of the one of the terms most strongly associated with illegal migrants in uk parliamentary debates over the last 20 years, research has found. i mean, so you can't say illegal when it comes to illegal migrants, or are they suggesting that you people are calling all migrants illegal even though they're not? >> well, it sounds to me like they're saying that people in government are using the word. >> a lot when. >> a lot when. >> we're discussing migration, but they would, wouldn't they? because that's a problem that politicia

tony blair had done his deal in the desert a year earlier. there was a very strong push to normalize relations with libya. and as far as the libyans were concerned, if they were gonna do any deal about oil, that deal had to involve megrahi coming home. we have been in contact with the scottish government, indicating that we objected to this. we thought it was a mistake. we're now in contact with the libyan government, and want to make sure that he's not welcomed back. interviewer: how did you feel when megrahi was released? pissed. and i'd had nothing to drink. i was angry. i'm not a big believer in the death penalty, but i think you need to sit in prison the rest of your life and think about what you did. reporter: abdulbasset al-megrahi had been sentenced to life, but because he has cancer and is believed to have only three months to live, he was released and returned to libya today. to me, i thought, "well, i guess this is scottish justice and everything." but i found that all um... ..pretty appalling. reporter: hundreds of people were bus

and i felt tony blair could do in a way that was very strategic and thought. nd i believe heads of state need to be strategic, their thought and have a long view of issues. and tony had that. you did have a few with cherie blair had one on the panel. yeah. did one on the death penalty and probably get lost. but i made it clear to her she was objecting to my position when i was governor of texas of supporting the panel and as president, for that matter, supporting death penalty. i happen to believe that i made it to her. if justice is fair and swift, the death penalty saves lives. and she didn't agree. you were reelected with a majority of the vote the first time in 16 years that presidential nominee got a majority of popular vote. you had political capital, you went in on the social security issue first and only later. 2006 pushed for changes in immigration laws. right. those were not successful endeavors. have you learned from that? well, if i handed over again, i probably to run the immigration plan. i and, uh but i didn't. so i pushed social security. and th

. >> well, the pinch point in the 1990s, remember when tony blair was riding high was a blockade on foodcentres, teamed up with lorry drivers, with distribution centres, with fuel depots, a 25 percentile plummet in in popularity for even tony blair. back in the day, it got a bit friskier. the pubuc day, it got a bit friskier. the public still backed the farmers. i hate to push you on this, but three peaceful days and the prime minister clears off to cornwall. is it time to think about something a bit fruitier? >> i appreciate what you're saying. a big part of this is we are doing this on not on behalf of just ourselves, but our population. this country has been divided for a very long time, and we want to do things not just for ourselves but for everyone. and if anyone goes and looks up our list of our demands, that they can see what we're representing, like getting rid of iht for everyone, you know, no one deserves to have to pay a know, no one deserves to have to pay a tax on death of a loved one. that's something that we hold dear to ourselves. but going to the next step? yes, somethi

and, i suppose, we aren't making a value judgment we, ithink, reflect in the book that tony blair said that he wanted the 21st century to be a labour century. the 20th century had been a conservative century. of the 21st century entailed. party back into power. and we wanted to examine how that happened. and it is an incredible journey. including lisa nandy, who's now, of course, in cabinet, saying, actually, labour might not even exist if we don't sort ourselves out. back into power. are, if they haven't seen them in the paper? and then i want to hear what your favourite ones are, about jeremy corbyn. patrick, what is it? it's an extraordinary link between dominic cummings and jeremy corbyn. yeah, it's a remarkable story. politically after his long - career in the law as jeremy a second referendum. and that was why he i was so popular among what was he thwarting on the other side? - what did the corbynites want to do? _ and in the process, beat the tories in an election| and split them forever. mind bending. to work for boris johnson as his principal adviser, reality. when that fails.

. >> tony blair, bill clinton. >> tony blair, bill clinton, this idea that, look, there is a middle way there is. i mean, you could sum it up in one word, hope. right? and that's the thing that needs to come back into american politics and not just. >> american politics. i want to ask you about this american politics, the technology part that you were mentioning, right. >> because this i mean, the other huge story this week was about technology. the chinese came out with something called deepseek no deepseek deepseek. >> deepseek dim sum. >> well, they shouldn't have named. >> it so well, they said. a deepseek. okay. >> so deepseek, this is and it is kicking chatgpt's ass. it beat chatgpt as the most downloaded free app in a week. and this was they called it a sputnik moment. now kids, i know you don't know what sputnik. >> is and. >> you weren't born yet. not an excuse. neither was. >> i. and i know what sputnik is. okay? not an excuse. sputnik is. >> at the beginning of the space race. this is the late, late 50s. okay? there were russians. we thought we were going to beat them to the

. >> you are someone that backed tony blair to the hilt.ou said, oh, weapons of mass destruction, when actually it was only a weapon of mass delusion. >> well, i was only three years old when. >> it. i liked it, so. not really subsequent. >> not really sure you can make that comparison. but but no, no, no. look, donald trump claims to be this big dealmaker, but immediately in the call with putin, and in the days since, he's given away the threat of nato accession for ukraine, and also has said that anything before. pete hegseth said that anything before the borders of 20, before 2014, of ukraine are basically what they're going to get or sort of the picture rather. so spare me this idea that donald trump is negotiating this grand bargain. >> we don't. >> we don't. >> he's given he's he's he's given away. we don't main negotiating tactics that europe and the us had and he's playing us. >> us. >> for fools. >> for fools. >> i think you have to remember donald trump is the best negotiator. i mean, he's literally just managed to force multiple

remember as the day when prime minister tony blair was on his way to buckingham palace to offer his resignation to queen elizabeth. but there was another important event on the cloud. often the golden house terrace is one of london's most fashionable addresses. former residents include suite, the previous british prime ministers. it lies just a few 100 meters from ticket. any sentence the on the june day in 2007, the gym to the rose garden was filled with police 1st responders to the strange discovery of a man's body lying on the loan. the body was not a 63 year old doctor. ashley, small one father to a billionaire business. and despite his fall from a 5th floor balcony, would spawn more questions than answers the phone. did he jump or was he pushed no to him. one was the 3rd egyptian living in london to die and this way in 1973, we injection ambassador to the u. k. general lacy, nazis fell from a balcony in the very same building. and in 2001 actress to close me known as the cinderella of egypt and cinema, also found her dex. it's generally accepted the shaw small one was a highly valued intel

the the issues here in a moment must the former labour minister tony former labour prime minister tony blairdve riiuwii other macron and donald trump have known other much �*through macron and donald trump have known o1trump's| �* through macron and donald trump have known o1 trump's first �* through macron and donald trump have known o1 trump's first time. 'ough macron and donald trump have known o1 trump's first time. 'ou with keir starmer, it is a sir keir starmer, it is a newer relationship. when the prime minister last met donald trump, it —: at trump towers in september is at'trum'p'towers in�*a'eptember the un assembly. the during the un general assembly. the president up guy a president offered up guy needs a chicken and the british prime minister does not eat meat —— guy in i.| minister does not eat meat —— guy in u think has landed particularly with americans it a 7777 $7 pain; $7 pain; that $7 htiht that the 7 777 a point that the prime was a point that the prime minister does. i think that is something the e -e has compared much more political instability wea kness weakness in ot

have also been talking to alistair campbell, former director for director of communications for tony blair about the dos and even to the one that donald trump was in more bullish, much more aggressive, i think much more confident. and i think in terms of dos — be very, very clear about the messages that you want to land with him, the same messages that you're landing with the public and be very, very clear about what you want the impression interviewee was saying, i think keir starmer has set love actually moment when you stand alongside the president that is definitely a don't. that is absolutely a don't. and i agree again with matthew, who was just speaking there. about right between, if you like, the flattery and the demands. he did fact check him at one stage. and is that important, if the same thing happens again where he says things that are not factually true? he repeated in that first cabinet meeting yesterday. so if the same sort of scenario arises, what should sir keir starmer do? well, this is why it's so difficult to deal with donal trump, because you're right that the fact is,

when bill clinton and tony blair created a global leftist liberal network in the 1990's, they were calledtesmen. today, when trump, melei or moody -- modi talk, they are called a threat to democracy. this is the last double standard. but we are use to it. the good news is people no longer believe their lies. despite all the mud they throw at us, citizens keep voting for us because simply, people are not naive as the left considers them. they vote for us because we defend freedom. we love our nations. we want secure borders. we preserve businesses and citizens from the green leftist insanity. we defend family life. we fight against woke is him -- woke-is him -- woke-ism. we defend our right to free speech. our struggle is hard, but the choice is simple. we will surrender or will -- will we surrender to decline or will we reverse it? will we let our civilization fade or will we stand up and defend it? will we leave our children a weaker world or a stronger one? will we want the new generations to be ashamed of their roots, or will we recover awareness and pride of who we are and teach it to

not just in the u.s., not a huge issue for tony blair dedicated his career trying to do this and could not pull it off. no, i don't personally think there is a better solution at this moment. but i do think the solution is untenable. certainly to the arab countries that is around palestine, it would've been clear they are not taking these people in, former deputy prime minister said this is a declaration of war on the air people. if he is such a humanitarian you take those 2 million people and you bring them here to the u.s. which is the country you are in charge of and you resettle them. i'm just saying you cannot force these people don't other countries throats. >> albanians are saying we can help. >> we are talking about 2 million people. if you want to know crazy the idea is, you have to look no further than susie wiles face as he said it. there is a great shot of her. i think they call her looking very expressive. what is he saying? mike wallace kept it together but he looked surprised as well. last year jerrod said i think can have great water from property. in gaza. they could b

this person had the biggest electoral victory since tony blair. president trump had a massive -- first republic into win that popular vote in 20 years. they have this in common. what keir starmer will be pushing for, to your point about ukraine, is this security for ukraine. we saw emmanuel macron push for the same thing. keeping this in europe. what he says was "i'm not going to make security guarantees -- we are going to have europe do that." he is exactly right. president trump is the one that came on the scene. europe, the 2% mark. the guarantor of their securities, 1949, and is telling europe it's time to step up. as you look at ukraine, you are the ones that need to secure that country. he is putting america first but not america alone, hence this meeting. and -- >> can i just throw in the price tag for rebuilding ukraine? the number is out there, $500 billion. some crazy number like that. at some point they will look at us and say "you guys are going to write the check." obviously, president trump is in a powerful position. he wants to take

prime minister tony blair.ing through this and when i get information, i will pass that along, but that is what i have so far. >> laura: kevin, all these great to see you. thank you so much. grab your signs and put on your protest shoes and someone call al sharpton. discrimination is afoot. a one was passed over for promotion and demoted while two lesser were moved up. i forgot to mention she is straight and white while the promoter workers and their boss were gay. she sued and the case went to the supreme court, which seems ready to at least take her side. speak of the question presented is whether the majority group plaintiff has to show something more than minority group plaintiff here whether a straight person has to show more than a gay person. everybody over here says no. >> we are on radical agreement on that today, it seems to me.gs spell radical agreement just as courtship. fox news contributor and law professor, jonathan turley.as now, some of the articles namini thiste as lowering the bar for white p

did you know that they were funding the tony blair institute?hey were funding rory stewart's wife? it's incredible. we thought you were our friends. but you are actually -- american taxpayers were funding this anti-west ideology. and the problem is when the people in britain voted for something different, when they tried to change the government, when they tried to change the system in 2016, in 2019, and in 2024, they found the same people were still in power. the bureaucracy had not changed. and it is no surprise that young people are losing their faith in democracy, because they don't believe it can change things. and amazingly, during all of this, many so-called conservatives were busy hugging greta thin berg. they were putting up taxes. i'm not joking about that. they were increasing immigration. they were pursuing transgender ideology. and it is no wonder that the conservative party had its worst defeat since 1834. patriotic brits have had enough. they have had enough. we look across the atlantic with envy. we see president trump in the exe

but i think, i was thinking about when tony blair became leader of the labor party it's challenging with the socialist orthodoxy. he was so brave to go comprehensive people. the analogy to it's like you just don't see that anymore. going up to people and going you're wrong and you've been wrong for 50 years and he changes the party in three or four years and is part -- it started with one speech. sometimes i think especially we write speeches and congressional context where it always been to the country but there are moments when speeches can be consequential like in 2004. moments like this historically i try to look at what people should be doing. >> unless you have instant jealousy i think we'll have two and here. thank you for everybody coming up tonight and our wonderful guests for coming to washington. [applause]

plus has been revealed by tony blair's think tank that labour is overestimating the number of jobs totate of the nation starts right now. we'll see. i'm also joined this fight by my panel. senior reporter ellie wheatley and political journalist and broadcaster zoe grunwald. as even broadcaster zoe grunwald. as ever, please let me know your thoughts, your views. gbnews.com/electionparty. but now it's time for the news with sam francis. >> very good evening to you. the top story from the newsroom at 8:00. well, donald trump has accused emmanuel macron and keir starmer of doing nothing to end

and even the tony blair institute, which is favourable to these kinds of net zero policies, has admittedly that actually there's no jobs coming out of this. you know, this these are just numbers on people will produce a paper and they'll say, in theory, there will be all these great magical green jobs, but actually real jobs are being shut down in the here and now. you know, we had port talbot shedding more than several thousand jobs. we have car factories closing down. we have grangemouth, scotlands largest oil refinery, closing down. >> plants as well. yeah. you see, i look at it. i could i can see, i look at it. i could i can see us encouraging green energies and things. i can see all that. but you encourage that. but you keep, you keep you don't knock all these places down and close them up in the meantime. surely they can exist side by side. >> well, you you would think so. but i think the problem is we have, especially in the form of ed miliband, but also in, in energy secretaries past, its ideological, you know, they really believe that the key thing is reducing emissions rather t

but actually this goes back to tony blair.opted massive amounts of these ridiculous laws into the human rights, human rights laws that he created, which are also supported by the echr. and we can't get rid of them. and the tories certainly couldn't get rid of them without labour saying, you're all dictators. you want to you want to overthrow the human rights bill, which is again, a very, very difficult thing for tories to do without being slammed on the front pages for being called dictators and fascists. >> do you believe that we have a duty of care to foreign paedophiles? like kai does? >> i'm on national television at the moment, so yes. no, i don't believe that we have a duty of care to foreign paedophiles. i think emma hit the nail on the head that even if we do get out of the echr, which i think we should, the ideological capture of the bench. >> i. >> i. >> agree, means that even if we get out of that awful convention, they're going to interpret other laws in a way which will seriously damage this country. i think that'

he might as well have prefaced it with a tony blair's. this is not a moment of soundees blair's.his is not a moment of soundbites but secure at home, strong abroad which actually sounds like a deodorant. power. it is. yeah. power back on. no, he's not back on. i like the other thing they said here that keir said the russian dictator would only respond to strength. well, all bullies like that, including trump. yeah. although trump also responds to flattery, it would seem. i'm interested to see what's happening with the beans. he's being double teamed by starmer and macron, and macron was kind of the friendly version of it. we saw from the speeches calling him dear donald quite a lot. let's see what you know how this goes. kerry. hello. hello. josh had to run to the toilet quickly. >> is that what it was? yeah. we're not gonna admit the mic wasn't working. no no no, no, never say it. never, never admit the truth. don't show the strings. hard power back. missed all of that. yeah, i'm just saying they're really giving it the macho sexual connotations with a picture of brooke shields

years has come from the european union, and this damning report concludes, this data proves that tony blair's disastrous open borders policy changed britain forever. now, a turkish couple who paid for their two children, aged just six and nine, to be illegally shipped to britain on a dinghy. well, they are now applying for asylum in britain themselves. and, of course, they claim that the european court of human rights should respect their right to a family life, because this use of an accompanied children opened the floodgates to yet more illegal immigration , and an unholy row immigration, and an unholy row has broken out after the actress cynthia erivo, a black woman, has been cast to play jesus in a hollywood play of jesus christ superstar. critics have slammed this as blasphemy and roared. is nothing sacred? not even jesus christ himself from wokery. and that's all coming up in your next hour. well, the show pleasure to have your company take a look at this picture posted on social media by zora sultana, the now independent mp, who of course was booted out of the labour party, lost the wh

plus has been revealed by tony blair's think tank that labour is overestimating the number of jobs to be created from net zero. state of the nation starts right now. we'll see. i'm also joined this fight by my panel. senior reporter ellie wheatley and political journalist and broadcaster zoe grunwald. as even broadcaster zoe grunwald. as ever, please let me know your thoughts, your views. gbnews.com/electionparty. but now it's time for the news with sam francis. >> very good evening to you. the top story from the newsroom at 8:00. well, donald trump has accused emmanuel macron and keir starmer of doing nothing to end the war in ukraine. it comes ahead of their visit to the white house next week. however, cabinet minister pat mcfadden insists britain is, he says, in a good position, with mr trump urging his government colleagues to focus on actions not just what donald trump says. well, speaking to fox news, the united states president also said volodymyr zelenskyy has no cards in the peace talks. take listen. >> but they didn't do anything ehhen >> but they didn't do anything either.

i felt sorry for tony blair, who coincided with the younger george bush, whose attack on iraq was not exactly a logical response to al qaeda's terrorist outrages against new york city and fiwith the outrages against new york city and %;£with their??? even outrages against new york city and fiftiwith their??? even though policy with the us. even though this was the wrong decision for us, both morally and strategically. the deal that trump wants to do is one where he allows putin off the hook, and he gives him a lot without getting much in return. i have two points to make. one, brexit has left the uk in a weaker position because we used to be the negotiators between the european continent and the us. this is no longer a this is no longer a position that exists. and secondly, because the eu no longer has our back. if i were advising the government and i do not envy their position, i would make it clear that trump is a playground bully and playground bullies only respond to strength. >> may i stop you there? yeah. let's take your point at sza >> whenever britain uses sza foreign policy st

the judicial activism whereby lawyers and courts have become increasingly political ever since tony blairught in the human rights act, they've been deeply troubled by the decisions we've seen over the last two weeks, michel, where we've had a number of foreign national offenders and illegal migrants allowed to stay in the country on spurious terms, and they've been deeply troubled by the two tier justice that they've seen in this country in recent years. i think fundamentally, the legal system is really in a fragile place because it has become, i would argue, overtly political. and when you become political, you're going to get a political response. so i think lawyers, judges, the courts should go back to doing what they do, remembering that they are supposed to be neutral institutions and step back from being as political as they are. >> james. >> james. >> i think matt is right that politicians should be allowed to criticise the rulings of judges, but i think that exchange in the commons last week was one of the most shameful things i've seen to see the leader of the opposition and the

but the human rights act, passed under tony blair, forces all court judgements to adhere to this increasingly foreign and unaccountable court. so listen, the only way, i think to restore common sense to our immigration system, also to our legal system to deport the more than 1 million illegal migrants who are here in the uk to stop those small boat crossings in the channel is. and i've said it again, i'll keep saying it until somebody out there does. it is by leaving the european convention on human rights and repealing the human rights act. our leaders know this. the legal system know this. but of course, they're choosing not to do what needs to be done to keep the british people safe and secure. now, as ever, let me know your views at gbnews.com/yoursay or tweet me at goodwin j. now i'm joined down the line before turning to my panel by krish kandiah, founder of the sanctuary foundation, a refugee charity. krish, every day i appreciate we obviously have different views on this, but every day people watching this show and more, more, more generally, british taxpayers are reading up or readin

he might as well have prefaced it with a tony blair's. this is not a moment of soundees blair's.his is not a moment of soundbites but secure at home, strong abroad which actually sounds like a deodorant. power. it is. yeah. power back on. no, he's not back on. i like the other thing they said here that keir said the russian dictator would only respond to strength. well, all bullies like that, including trump. yeah. although trump also responds to flattery, it would seem. i'm interested to see what's happening with the beans. he's being double teamed by starmer and macron, and macron was kind of the friendly version of it. we saw from the speeches calling him dear donald quite a lot. let's see what you know how this goes. kerry. hello. hello. josh had to run to the toilet quickly. >> is that what it was? yeah. we're not gonna admit the mic wasn't working. no no no, no, never say it. never, never admit the truth. don't show the strings. hard power back. missed all of that. yeah, i'm just saying they're really giving it the macho sexual connotations with a picture of brooke shields

but tony blair did a lot of damage to britain with derry , irvine, campbell, derry, irvine, campbell,andelson and brown. so they they embedded all sorts of horrific laws like the human rights act and, you know, the equalities act, they started immigration. they weren't responsible for all of it. they started the legal apparatus for it. and then the tories. well, next the coalition. david cameron's got a lot of blood on his hands. and ultimately the electorate who government should be representing the taxpayers, the people who fund the country, the people who fund the country, the people who work hard, who pay the people who work hard, who pay their taxes. very often the businesses collect all the taxes for the government, so they are not doing their job. and that's why reform is doing so well, because people want representation in parliament. they want a government that looks after their interests, not the interests of people who come here either legally or illegally, who've never paid into the economy, never contributed to our wealth. thank you. ultimately, you know, we need change a

the judicial activism whereby lawyers and courts have become increasingly political ever since tony blairrought in the human rights act, they've been deeply troubled by the decisions we've seen over the last two weeks, michel, where we've had a number of foreign national offenders and illegal migrants allowed to stay in the country on spurious terms, and they've been deeply troubled by the two tier justice that they've seen in this country in recent years. i think fundamentally, the legal system is really in a fragile place because it has become, i would argue, overtly political. and when you become political, you're going to get a political response. so i think lawyers, judges, the courts should go back to doing what they do, remembering that they are supposed to be neutral institutions and step back from being as political as they are. >> james. >> james. >> i think matt is right that politicians should be allowed to criticise the rulings of judges, but i think that exchange in the commons last week was one of the most shameful things i've seen to see the leader of the opposition and th

you think back to tony blair and bosnia and the iraq war.sues they are remembered for and the choices he's taking right now about about ukraine trying to build this peace, working out with donald trump, if he can underwrite that. peace is so, so important. and plus the chagos islands. but just remind our islands. butjust remind our viewers what's happening today. and this is of course, 515 today, uk time the pm arrives in the white house. he then goes to the white house. he then goes to the oval office, where he'll sit there in front of the fire with president donald trump. albion, there will be all there asking him questions and seeing what president trump might say and what the keir starmer might say. 5:35 pm. they offer a lunch that's uk time and 7 pm. live on gb news. the joint press conference between the president, united states and the uk prime minister. huge moments happening here and politics is moving so, so quickly. you mentioned that emily, is the media focusing ment

and i'm going to be even more sort of firm on this and say, you know, back back in the day before tony blairpolitical change through the threat or use of violence. now, this is the threat and to an extent, the use of violence for a political purpose. and i�*m not going to call it terrorism, but it is verging on that. and for the police not to take action. and, you know, i�*m a former police officer as well, and there are occasions when it is very difficult to make arrests. i wasn't there, but arrests. i wasn�*t there, but we've got to, as a nation, confront this violence in politics and this intimidation, because otherwise our democracy fails and it fails, if only because people are afraid to stick their head above the parapet and express them. >> and i'll tell you what, susie, people you know have a proper tour. me and nigel and richard and rupert and james, and that's fair enough. we can and that�*s fair enough. we can handle that. but when you see members of parliament like sara sultana putting stuff on a on her twitter feed, you know, nigel's coming to birmingham with a big cross through

but actually this goes back to tony blair. adopted massive amounts of these ridiculous laws into the human rights, human rights laws that he created, which are also supported by the echr. and we can't get rid of them. and the tories certainly couldn't get rid of them without labour saying, you're all dictators. you want to you want to overthrow the human rights bill, which to overthrow the human rights billvalues that are at the core the values that are at the core of defence. and he asked europeans to think about what it is that they are defending. he actually spoke up for the values of democracy and accountability. he spoke against censorship and he spoke against mass migration and urged leaders of the of the european countries. at that conference, he urged them to listen to their to listen to their electorates and to not be afraid of their people. now, i think that that was the most moving democratic speech, pro—democracy speech that i've ever heard. and the fact that they've got their knickers in so much of a twist over it

a the tony blair institute; a ' ~ 7 f �*and politician the tony esteir ! ,,. ,, w w �*and politician and lawyer and politician and member of the ukrainian parliament for the pro—and centrist voice party which is but? but is in opposition, but is supportive of president zelensky policy. supportive of president zel hopper policy. supportive of president zel hopper hayes policy. supportive of president zel hopper hayes has policy. supportive of president zel hopper hayes has been y. ina in a position for 7 in a position for the �*admin attrition in git on task with the of defence 7 77 7 7 7 77 7o7fde7fe7n7ceand7 77 department of defence and she was the chair of previously she was the chair of overseas the and overseas in the trumn and the , campaign from government is nick a �*for cabin office meaning he the cabin office meaning he——— ., .,, ,, across government works across government as well as our with the european as �* ben wallace was unionsas—sir benrvc'allace was secretary iunionsaerir benrvc'allace was secretary of state for .s h.” was 7 77 forfouf777