if you look at smith, tony dunn g, mark tomlin, what they have accomplished, they cannot say the coachingalent isn't there. , even after football be segregated, they never got head offers from majority white schools in spite of having some of the greatest coaching minds in football. not only were they not rewarded on the basis of their talent, they need to prove to the white world. they were in a world that was valid unto itself. you think that a school that wanted to build up its program would look at that. generations later, and at the college level where there is no formal commitment to diversity, you see the black are notand their legacy getting those opportunities either. is it still the case that in the south bay view these through a racial prism? why is that the case? do they look at this through that prism? >> i am going to refer to shack on this because i am a northerner and he is a southerner. what i will say is the power of boosters and alumni is very in college as it is a factor proteins don't have to deal with. pro football contributes to a . thete more for the merit evidence