i read the book by my friend tony robbins and he said acupuncture is very helpful.hey are laughing at me in the studio, but i am serious, try it, just once and you will think me. now jesse, please, please, please and your show with i am waters, when you don't it messes with my whole evening. i'm going to do something for you just tonight. tucker is up next, but remember everything, i am watters, and this is my world. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tucker: oh, good evening, welcome to "tucker carlson tonight," weeks before the russian military invaded ukraine, a chilling story began to appear in a number of american media outlets. unnamed sources from the biden administration warned that if vladimir putin was preparing what they called a false flag attack, the point of the attack was to be a pretext for war with ukraine. the suggestion was that they

trump models himself after, the positive language, i was reading that that is not effective but tony robbins using something much like that. what i am wondering is in terms of chatter the idea of positive chatter versus negative chatter, when does this become into negative mind control and what authoritarian organizations use and when it can be a positive thing that the athlete focuses on so that he succeeds? >> great questions. i sure hope none of these tools are used to help people mind control others. any tool can be miss abused. with respect to neurolinguistic processing and a lot of these other approaches to helping people a lot of them just haven't been held up to scientific scrutiny. every single thing in this book is science-based. i am a scientist. it is very important me this work is grounded in science, doesn't mean in the future we won't learn new things that update how we think about what is in there at the time of the book was written the best cutting edge in terms of what we know so with respect to some of the other practices i think there may be some interesting elements in t

saying is not effective but then tony robbins seems to be doing well, using something much like that. i guess what i'm wondering is in terms of chatter, the idea of positive chatter versus negative chatter and when does it become into negative mind control and what authoritarian organizations use and when can it be a positive thing like the athlete focuses on so he succeeds. >> great questions. i sure hope that none of these tools are used to help people mindcontrol others . any tool can be mis-abuse and with respect to neurolinguistic processing and a lot of these other approaches to helping people, a lot of them just haven't been held up to scientific scrutiny. every single thing in this book is science-based. i'm a scientist, that's my day job. is important to methat this work is grounded in science . >> .. >> some interesting elements in theirno but with the science, we just cannot know how much of that is placebo cut of intervention. i believe it that. >> i wonder at some point, you get to be that narcissistic personality and i think of stuart smalley, you know, on the s&l you kn

models himself after the positive language and programming and saying it's not effective but then tony robbins it very well guess what i am wondering is in terms of chatter the idea of positive chatter versus negative chatter can come into negative mindr control and authoritarian organizations use with the focuses on so he succeeds. >> thank you. >> right questions i sure hope none of these tools help people mind control others. any tool could be mis- abused with respect to linguistic processing and these other approaches to helping people, a lot of them have not been held up to scientific scrutiny. every single thing in this book is science -based. i am a scientist that is my day job it's very important to me this work is grounded in science it does not mean a future we won't learn new things itt updates what we think. o at the time that book was written the best cutting edge io terms of what we know. and respect us and those other practices there may be some interesting elements in there. but until we subject that to science we just cannot know how much of that is placebo kind of interventio

the end the neurolistic programming and i was reading in saying that's not effective but then tony robbinseems to be very well using something much like that. so, i guess what i'm wondering is in terms of chatter like that that the idea of positive chatter versus negative chatter neurolex programming and when has become you know, into negative of mind control and what authoritarian organizations use or and when can be the the positive thing where it can like be that but the athlete focuses on so that he succeeds. thank you great questions. well, i sure hope that none of these tools are used to help mind control others. you know. any tool can be miss abused and with respect to nlp neurolinguistic processing and a lot of these other approaches to helping people a lot of them just haven't been held up to scientific scrutiny every single thing in this book. is science-based. i'm a scientist. that's my day job. it's very important to me that this work is grounded in science doesn't mean that in the future. we won't learn new things that updates how we think but what's in there is at the time th