another viewer, tony wright, recorded this video for us, with these thoughts.ase, bbc, can you rein in emily maitlis? she should be taught how to hold a civil conversation. most of her hapless subjects are subject to a barrage of contentious, inflammatory, aggressive, and often insulting interruptions. i have no great love of politicians, but i have to commend them for holding their temper during a typical emily maitlis interview. she interrupts so much that the people are never allowed to get their answer out. and that, for us, the viewers, doesn't allow us to make a judgement on what they are actually trying to say. the interview is therefore pointless. viewer tony wright there. well, with me right now is ian katz, the editor of newsnight. thank you for coming newswatch. the reference that andrea leadsom made to patriotism has been much mocked, but some viewers say she really did have a point about the focus of brexit coverage being relentlessly negative. the first thing i should say is that i thought it was an excellent accountability interview. i think — i'

another viewer, tony wright, recorded this video for us, with these thoughts.e of contentious, inflammatory, aggressive, and often insulting interruptions. i have no great love of politicians, but i have to commend them for holding their temper during a typical maitlis interview. she interrupts so much that the people are never allowed to get their answer out. and that, for us, the viewers, doesn't allow us to make a judgement of what they're actually trying to say. the interview is therefore pointless. viewer tony wright there. well, with me right now is ian katz, the editor of newsnight. ian, thank you for coming newswatch. the reference that andrea leadsom made to patriotism has been much mocked, but some viewers say she really did have a point about the focus of brexit coverage being relentlessly negative. the first thing i should say is that i thought it was an excellent accountability interview. i think — i'm sure there are some viewers out there who will agree with some of these complaints. i think the vast majority of people who saw it will think that c

wright who is in westminster. the snp are saying they want a parliamentary investigation into what sirjohn has been saying about tonyaight with the nation, are there likely to be repercussions from this interview?” don't think so, it's a fairly predictable response from opposition parties here who opposed the iraq war very strongly. i don't think there will be because fascinating interview though this was i don't think it fundamentally changes anything about what we learnt surrounding the run—up to the iraq war. what sirjohn chilcot does very carefully is reflect one year on on those findings, having thought about it more. he does give that very clear line in response to the question about whether or not tony blair had been straight with the british public in the run—up to the warand he british public in the run—up to the war and he does not think he was. he is quite clear, he does not say anything more about tony blair's honesty or anything like that, and tony blair's offers have been clear to make that clear today. there is an interesting distinction made between tony blair's belief and his emotion in the cause fo