but i will grant that in toobey the court said it didn't need to address that, though it had never done that in any of its previous cases and just say look, if this statute did that, if it did nothing more than say to the attorney general register them as reasonable, with no requirements, no creation of the criminal offense, no fixing of a penalty. >> just and reasonable or in the public interest. would those be ok or not ok? >> i think as long as it's done the things it did here. it created, it fixed the penalty and on the civil side, it has said, and you provided some standard like that in the statute, the court's cases indicate that's enough. i do want to say even if you think that's not enough, this statute does come inside of that. because this is not an agency just supplying all of the real content or substance to a broad standard like public interest or just and reasonable. congress made a lot of those judgments for itself and left to the attorney general a much narrower practical problem. >> there's a lot of discussion in our case law about the propriety of the court reading int