[laughter] so our panel title is bioethics and the transhuman future. and in an e-mail to me, brad wilson actually also threw into the subject heading the word posthuman future just for good measure. so the question i'm going to ask today is what do posthuman and transhuman mean. and i'm going to argue that they have no meaning. there's no condition that could reasonably be described in either of these ways. all the conditions that receive these names are either, a, impossibilities; b, deficient human conditions; or, c, amplifications but not changes of human nature as it already exists. everything in category c is, i think, intrinsically permissible. but some of it might be impermissible because of its side effects, and much of it is impermissible in approach; that is, the ways it's reasonable to expect that we could achieve instances of c are themselves often morally impermissible. and that, i'll suggest at the end, tells us something familiar about our likely future. the terms posthuman and transhuman are thought to refer to a kind of being descended