never written there, let's say from the point of view of the people, almost immediately after the transinle of the field came out, but this multi-volume book did not enjoy such fame as karamzin's history of the russian state. it is obvious that klyuchevsk's russian history course was written not so much from the state positions as from social ones. quite interesting experiments were actually conducted with non-state history in the 20s, when, on the one hand , communism actually nullified all imperial traditions, the history of description, and on the other hand , this stalinism did not reach historical circles, and some surviving e-e academicians and members of the old russian correspondent got the opportunity in this very short period of time to write innovative works until now their potential has not been exhausted and finally today even still in russia despite everything there is a yeltsin center and in yekaterinburg that teaches from there there is an interactive exhibition on the history of russia dedicated to the struggle for freedom, that is, it cannot be said that in russia everyt

happens extremely rarely and only in periods of m. the view of the people almost immediately after the transinf the field was published, but this multi-volume volume did not enjoy such fame as karamzin's history of the russian state . it is obvious that the course of russian history was written not so much from the state positions, but from the social ones. klyuchevska's experiments with non-state history are actually quite interesting took place in the 20s, when, on the one hand , communism actually nullified all imperial traditions