transparently, yes. but there's going to continue to be hard work and irrespective of how things play out in november, we need to make sure that those at the very pointy end of the spear get what they need to get their job done. i'm going to turn it over now to the deputy director of the central intelligence agency, david cohen. thank you, david. the floor is yours. thank you for the opportunity to work with you guys. it really is an honor. david. [ applause ] >> thanks to all of you for joining us today. >> we've reached the end of another terrific conference on the ethos and profession of intelligence. a lot of ground has been covered today. every aspect of this program has been outstanding. i think i learned a great deal. i hope everybody else learned a great deal. i'm very grateful for all of your attention in making this such a huge success. i want to thank our wonderful hosts at george washington university, including president knapp and david, and the team for everything they've done to help put t

we talk about transparency. this is an opportunity to practice transparency. we are not threatening them. we are asking. is a mere question. i agree that all five should agree. if they don't, then we don't do it. we don't want to be unfair to any candidate. it's merely asking a question. we have to have a backbone, guys, asking the questions don't hurt. it gives the public an opportunity to look at the caliber of the candidates being presented to the mayor. they know who they are and they know who the backgrounds are and they know the mayor has a real choices in front of him and it's great for the opportunity and they know how the process is resolved. trying to put it out on a technicality or i disagree with it it's really asking a harmless question. >> perhaps if we keep going we can ask the person who their intent is hiring. >> you said something that i want to check as well. i will let commissioner hwang ask the question. >> to get his thoughts around what the chief's search process is. is there a change in thinking? >> no problem. i would agree that the tr

he does not seem very transparent so he does not seem to be inclined toward transparency. we do not know what it would look like. he has not spoken about foia from what we can tell on the campaign trail. except to criticize his opponent. >> in regard to a hypothetical trump presidency, let me recall an episode from the 1960's. the supreme court case that upheld the fairness doctrine was, i think the history shows it was instigated or supported in part by the kennedy administration, a liberal democratic administration suing a radio station that broadcasted john birch type material. that is one thing a president could do, a president with hostility toward the established press, institutional press might try to stimulate private litigation against "the new york times" or others. i hope i am not planting a suggestion in his mind. >> i don't think you need to plan one. -- i don't think you need to plant one. donald trump has threatened or sued the media dozens of times over. >> and presumably, he would be happy to finance libel litigation in the same way he is offered -- has of

i think when you have a commitment to transparency or you say you have a commitment to transparency,i would think that those are not the types of arguments that you would want your lawyers under your administration to be making. >> in fact, i mentioned earlier i was watching katie do a marvelous job. you had interesting makeup of your panel in the dc circuit. >> we did. we had two senior judges and accordingly because we two senior judges, the judge presided over the panel who was also rumored to be possible contender for the supreme court. >> a president clinton administration. >> and then we had judge edwards was one of the senior judges and judge sintell. they have done a very number of famous cases, foia cases. >> one who is considered on the left and one who is considered on the right. >> generally pretty protransparency, profoia. .. walk away from the state department with all of his records. when the state department was sued under the freedom of information act, the state department said we don't have him. so why are you suing us? they said you could of course ask, do the sta

so why not transparency? it funny that on clinton network news that we're using transparency as a word. let's talk about transparency. >> yes, as you insult us, go on. >> we all know you guys are the greatest super pac for her. the thing is, there are so many things -- whatever you guys say about donald trump, he can hit back harder on her twice. everything. >> she paid taxes. this is a fact. this is part of the record. >> but it goes beyond taxes. it's about integrity and trustworthiness. the reason why she had such a problem in the primary against bernie sanders was that democrats did not trust her. a majority of the people in america do not trust her. she says one thing and then she switches her stance. >> how about she tells us about her black stepson that you guys aren't covering? >> you can't just come in and throw a conspiracy theory out and let it smolder there as we're heading to our next hour. >> black lives matter. go check out her black stepson. thank you. >> blair, joe, pax, we'll be investigatin

just in favor of transparency.servatives and centrists are saying we need more transparency. just as a matter of principle it seems to me they should be for him being transparent, neutrally transparent. mark: so it's late on a friday. fbi is shut down for the weekend. john: we don't know where comey is. mark: if comey stays silent, this thing seems to be to be a wildfire all the way through to monday. john: it can't not. comey's behavior has been hard to parse but the pressure on him , in the coming hours to say something more is going to be intense. that's the only thing i can predict. mark: incredible if he says something. and incredible if he says nothing. mark: we'll be back after this. ♪ ♪ before we go, democratic vice president candidate tim kaine says the timing of the "very, very troubling." we are also this weekend on sunday night going to explore this topic as well as joe biden on the circus, our showtime documentary series, sunday night at 8:00 eastern time. biden and the latest on this story next on "bl

we are proud to open government focus on transparency has resulted in an unprecedented level of access to previously classified material. the december 2009 executive order which created the national declassification center at the archives, the mandate to review by 2013 for declassification a backlog of 352 million pages dating back to world war i. the six oldest records were world war i formulas for invisible ink, declassified by the cia. thank you. completed oneview time had been to complete processing, 62% declassification rate. importantly, indexing on demand approach where requesters ask for series, 239 projects totaling 8 million pages, 80% declassification rate. the best news is the review process will prevent future backlog scenarios. according to the recent report on the information security oversight office, production of national security secrets fell significantly over the past five-years. 52,000 see yours were created in 2015. 258,000 were created in 2005. security news reports that data appeared to confirm the national security classification is undergoing a slow-motion pr

and the transparence. the way i read the conditions is that they'll comply with the planning code on those. >> that's correct. [inaudible] is part of the design standards under form of the retail and regulated by the planning code. so if you were to give the project sponsor relief from formula retail standards they would still need to apply for variance for the storefront window transparency under the section 145. the signs has proposed, even at that large height, they comply with sign code. it's the awnings that exceeds the allowable area. this time standards the industry standards for signs have read ability standards for drivers at 35 mi./h with a signed with a letter height of, i believe, 7 inches. so thus allowing and in team 18 inch sign is actually far greater than what is needed for people were passing by in vehicles. it actually exceeds what is permitted were deemed readable four freeway traffic. >> i'm confused. do we have the discretion to change that anyway. we usually don't get into the >> no.

there are certain things that are transparent to the public and to the decision makers like ourselves and heretofore are not taint with that, i want to give the brunt gentleman an opportunity to speak to us and for us to get to know him and to follow-up on our last hearing we raised a number of issues if there are no questions i'm going to turn it over to mr. hotline and welcome we're delighted that you've joined us you have a long history in stewardship museums around the brunt global with that, please come on up. >> well, thank you very much supervisor peskin and supervisor president breed and supervisor yee i'm here able to lay out some thoughts but i guess those structures and outcomes about the organization of the fine arts museums of san francisco and respond probably to some of the questions that have been raised at the first meeting and those are kind of at a briefly to prepare for to hearing pr i've prepared a presentation that covers this and tends i'll show pictures it is nice to show you some things to kind of - >> yeah. >> oh, i can see that thanks. >> okay. >> all right.

there are certain things that are transparent to the public and to the decision makers like ourselves and heretofore are not taint with that, i want to give the brunt gentleman an opportunity to speak to us and for us to get to know him and to follow-up on our last hearing we raised a number of issues if there are no questions i'm going to turn it over to mr. hotline and welcome we're delighted that you've joined us you have a long history in stewardship museums around the brunt global with that, please come on up. >> well, thank you very much supervisor peskin and supervisor president breed and supervisor yee i'm here able to lay out some thoughts but i guess those structures and outcomes about the organization of the fine arts museums of san francisco and respond probably to some of the questions that have been raised at the first meeting and those are kind of at a briefly to prepare for to hearing pr i've prepared a presentation that covers this and tends i'll show pictures it is nice to show you some things to kind of - >> yeah. >> oh, i can see that thanks. >> okay. >> all right.

is it the victim or is it law enforcement or is it transparency? i think there is no real correct joce: but without clear answers or standards for the use of police body cameras, a dangerous dilemma remains. jennifer: they shouldn't have to think, "oh my god, if i call 911, is it going to be filmed and am i going to end up on the internet?" public safety should never come with those kinds of questions or consequences -- ever. sharyl: we blurred the identities of the victims in the videos. much of the debate over creating a policy on the release of body cam videos hinges on state laws. right now, 17 states have at least one law specific to the 17 more have attempted to pass legislation but failed -- and 16 haven't yet tried. still to come on "full measure" -- we look at a missile system that's supposed to protect us from nuclear attack. so far, it doesn't work well, and wait until you hear about the big bonuses to the company it's not uncommon for autistic kids to flap their hands. and so when i saw that, that was completely disqualifying. i'm a rep

you know, so, as carrie said, transparency is here to stay. z along with that, there needs to be a cultural change a cultural change from 2001 understand that that is the case. so, if -- you know, if the new york times or if dan at yahoo! is reporting on the cia is engaged and, you know, covert action involving, you know, u.s. drone programming, and it's widely known and yet there's still, you know, can't discuss that, i'm not sure at what point why that's secret. but that is a great example of something for over the course of two years where, you know, the cia in particular would, you know, say no. and i guess we can even talk about the fact that hillary clinton said it was in her e-mail us. it was in the "new york times" so it was out there. i think that largely there seems to be -- or there needs to be a cultural change. to understand that yes, transparency is here, whether you like it or not. >> you look like you want to jump in. >> so what that has done so far? put out these intelligence community transparency principles that sort of lays

they have the transparency but it is the transparency that is really needed today. on the clinton side. what do you make of this. a lot of the main stream media at the need g -- that knee-jerk reaction was that maybe it was nothing. i don't think that is where the conversation is going. this is a question of what does the fbi director mean by the language that he has used in this letter and for us not to take this any further or any more down a dangerous particle path that we need to until we know a lot more information. the fbi director has made clear he is looking at some additional information. at this point that's all he is doing. i think we are leaping to a much greater and unnecessary conclusion that anything improper is taking place here. hillary clinton has already been cleared by the fbi there is nothing in this letter that suggests she has done anything improper. again, now there's more evidence. now there are more players in the mix. this probably means is that everything that happened in july is null and void and the american public will be waiting for a

joce: but privacy is often a casualty in the larger concern over transparency. >> all of a sudden your loved one's death becomes a hashtag. and it becomes seen by millions of people and forwarded and scott: the need is great in haiti. hurricane matthew left his mark and misery, but fundraising following the 2010 earthquake was a disaster in itself. there are some calls for funding to be channeled elsewhere now. does that mean that the american red cross has lost its credibility? >> i think they've certainly lost some credibility. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] ? sharyl: welcome to "full measure." i'm sharyl attkisson. hurricane matthew is still impacting the southeast. some rivers crested just this weekend and parts of north carolina are still underwater. too deep to think about surviving in the long-term. one of them is an indian tribe in louisiana. they're part of a groundbreaking project to relocate together to higher ground at taxpayer expense. some are calling them the first "

can be scrutinized looking to hack it or find bugs. >> transparency is your friend when it comes to security. >> chances are if you are an elections official in the u.s. you have heard of brent turner. >> i refer people to air force and necessary use it. >> the former rock singer has spent the last decade spreading the gospel of open source voting systems as a member of the california voting association. >> i will not rest until we see the systems deploy nationally because all votes have to count. >> nearly everyone agrees the private systems used today are at the end of their life span and need to be replaced. when that happens both turner and sebis hope open source systems replace them. >> what happens if we do nothing and stick with what we have? >> i think it is the definition of insanity. you will get the same result, which is insecure systems, a lack of voter confidence and more expense than the counties can bear. >> reporter: and elections officials may just be starting to listen. both los angeles and san francisco are the first two california counties to set aside money to d

this transparency issue cannot be overstated.it matters tremendously to us and we're paying attention. >> be things. next speaker, please. >> hello. good evening i'm a concerned citizen i'm a visitor of san francisco, also saying with them. your city needs help. there's a big issue going on. my car was attacked and vandalized. insurance, these are taking advantage of these situations. that needs to be something done. there needs to cameras at intersections required by businesses to protect the citizens and people. i tried to contact the sfpd i cannot get through their phone numbers. bernie situation, disabled american born and raised in military background. their need something to be done about this. i'm a minister could i protect people. i tried to go around and help get i'm also retired policeman from north carolina. i quite evidence of knowledge and what's going on image greater protection situation for the people that alone also protecting the officers. we need a situation out there. the situation is as a hand could i visited

just for all of us to be transparent, but it's a significant story to your point 11 days to go. pictures of hillary clinton getting off her plane, she has a rally coming up. the question -- and gloria, you hit on it, mark i want you to respond. how does she anz to this? how does she handle it with so much on the line? >> first of all, she probably doesn't know what they're looking at either. you would suspect she wouldn't know. to gloria's point she's going to have to address it as quickly as possible and try to get it out of the way. as gloria said, we're 11 days out, there will be an incredible amount of pressure on james comey to wrap up this it willest iteration of his investigation or look into these e-mails given the timing. he has noted he doesn't know what the time frame is going to be on that. this is a boost for for trump campaign at a time they need one. the path to the presidency looks difficult and it's a political gift for trump but we should say this is a self-inflighted wound by hillary clinton who hindsight being what it was or is should have never set up this p

what transparency and accountability are the two pieces that you talked about.pecifically, what are the actions we can take your the board of supervisors the one >> sure. if you look at the recommendations of the report may start on page 159, been there done in categories. overall, i think the first major important step is having oversight. civilian independent oversight over what this police department does good by the way, oversight is not micromanaging a police department i was the independent police auditor for the city of san jose for five years. i wasn't interested for running a police department could pass on my expertise to what others interested in is ensuring what was done was being done in objective and proper fashion. san francisco we recommended for the police department and office of inspector general. that would have the function a civilian independent, independent not beholden to the chief, not beholden to anybody but reporting to you all in a public fashion on various aspects in the police department that you heard already the deficits the lack

this transparency issue cannot be overstated.it matters tremendously to us and we're paying attention. >> be things. next speaker, please. >> hello. good evening i'm a concerned citizen i'm a visitor of san francisco, also saying with them. your city needs help. there's a big issue going on. my car was attacked and vandalized. insurance, these are taking advantage of these situations. that needs to be something done. there needs to cameras at intersections required by businesses to protect the citizens and people. i tried to contact the sfpd i cannot get through their phone numbers. bernie situation, disabled american born and raised in military background. their need something to be done about this. i'm a minister could i protect people. i tried to go around and help get i'm also retired policeman from north carolina. i quite evidence of knowledge and what's going on image greater protection situation for the people that alone also protecting the officers. we need a situation out there. the situation is as a hand could i visited

this transparency issue cannot be overstated.it matters tremendously to us and we're paying attention. >> be things. next speaker, please. >> hello. good evening i'm a concerned citizen i'm a visitor of san francisco, also saying with them. your city needs help. there's a big issue going on. my car was attacked and vandalized. insurance, these are taking advantage of these situations. that needs to be something done. there needs to cameras at intersections required by businesses to protect the citizens and people. i tried to contact the sfpd i cannot get through their phone numbers. bernie situation, disabled american born and raised in military background. their need something to be done about this. i'm a minister could i protect people. i tried to go around and help get i'm also retired policeman from north carolina. i quite evidence of knowledge and what's going on image greater protection situation for the people that alone also protecting the officers. we need a situation out there. the situation is as a hand could i visited

>> it's transparency.e going to sit down and answer this thing, they had an answer. it wasn't 30 days before the election. 36, 37 days before the election. >> it wasn't that long ago, tom. >> the flip side of that is they dragged their feet on it. you get problems like this. if you're a politician, especially when we find out something, when the press finds out something, when the journalists find out something, we put it out there. that means the candidate, the campaign is not controlling the release of the information. we like it because we're out here trying to get all that we can out to the public. it's also, i think it's also good politics. if trump had put out his tax returns, the same weekend as tim kaine and mike pence and clinton, released her latest tax returns, then it would have been lumped in. it would have been a huge story by you wouldn't have a story like this coming out now at the worst possible time. >> rebecca, i think twofold here. a, is this the october surprise, at least for trump? b,

one was complete transparency. everyone thinks transparency is a great idea. they were required as part of this agreement to disclose all of their campaign, all of their donations to the clinton foundation. second of all, they agreed there would be a clear bright line between the actions of the clinton foundation and the state department and there would be no blurring of the two. those were commitments that were made and the clintons, as we all now know, and every buddy and knowledges, they completely violated those commitments. any commitments that are being made now going forward, i think we cannot have much faith because they don't have a track record of abiding by these principles. to me the issue is not just looking forward. we have to deal with her tender of secretary of state and setting up the server because we simply cannot trust, going forward, that these actions and activities will be self corrected. finally, the point i would make i would make is ultimately this is about more than the clintons. if they are to avoid legal jeopardy, in the very real

but there's also just i think primarily there's a question of transparency.k that after 15 years of war and the past operations in iraq were so controversial that there's a real element to be transparent for domestic political reasons and to try to be clear about what we're doing and why we're doing it and not really avoid the situation where there's this sense that the military is doing more than they're letting the public know. host: jason, an iraq vet. welcome. when did you serve? caller: i served march 2003 for the ground war. i want to talk real quick, i hear a lot about this trigger word transparency. we want the obama administration to be transparent but we're dropping supplies to isis oh it's an accident. oh, we're letting 400 plus vehicles fall into the hands of our enemies. oh. and then at the end of the day we're just going to spend more ground troops to reacquire those supplies and to get more people killed. if you really want the obama administration to be transparent, well, you're living in a fantasy world. we need to get troops on the ground ov

all to be so ironic and call are for transparency. bleached e-mails and destroyed her staff and now she wants transparency? the irony is not lost on the american public. >> all the points drum makes on the campaign trail. what would restore your confidence and in director jim comey? >> i think we are seeing him do the right thing now. >> if he determines and in nothing changes, there was no recommendation to pursue the charges in the past if he is to come out and determine they didn't find information, would your confidence be restored? >> as a lawyer, i respect him, but i think he should have recommended prosecution. she broke several laws including code 1924 and how she handled the storage of it. and many others do agree. loretta lynch may not agree with me, but independents and democrats agree to hillary clinton did break the law. >> how do combat charges of hypocrisy after the alleged conduct given the fact that news week said the following. trump's companies have destroyed or hitten thousands of e-mails and digital records and pa

night shyamalan. >> coming up. >> transparency is not going away, guys. >> hollywood weighs in on shears the stars clearly divided. slug >> shear top? no. >> and the gambler gets ready to walk away. why kenny rogers is saying goodbye to the stage. >> i don't know how much more time i've got. >> that's all straight ahead. >>> much more "insider" straight ahead. we are inside kenny rogers farewell tour with his bestie dolly parton. the two open up about the affair it was a construction accident, with a piece of heavy equipment ♪ and it shot me up into the roof, and it just kept breaking me in half. broke my back, severed my spinal column oh and five ribs broken, so... ♪ my dining room was changed into a bedroom ♪ and the insurance company was giving me a hard time. ♪ pond lehocky helped put my life back together. ♪ i'm at home with kenny and wanda rogers and the twins. >> get ready. >> everyone looks so snuggly, that was back in 2006 when our then "insider" kathie lee gifford sat down with kenny rogers, his wife and their then 2-year-old twins at their atlanta home. i mean, that was a con

.>>> big questions about the zika virus and transparency, 111 pregnant women contracting the virus in florida. >> tonight jarrod holbrook is digging to find out why the >> i am spring myself down with bug spray. that was a big thing. >> for expecting mothers zika is a concern on the mind. >> it is on my mind. >> florida's department of health tracked zika cases across the state, they released stats to the public county by county you can see how many cases there are. except for pregnant women. pregnant women stats are only so you can find out how many pregnant women have zika in the county you living something expecting mothers would like to see changed. >> definitely, it is a good important information it does affect your child. >> we asked why they cannot tell the number of zika cases impacting pregnant women by county. they say privacy. >> i don't see it that way, if tell us. >> we asked how it violates privacy laws when the patient's name is protected. they started throwing exemption statutes like this one, ownership and control of patient records. it can exempt the information but

they are focused to provide transparency as they try the fix the city's water problems. >> transparency means how we operate but also what our infrastructure needs are so the public can demand that these things get addressed. >> believe it or not, the tours brought plenty of people to the water treatment facilities this >> as the cleanup after hurricane matthew continues, officials from volusia county has died, bringing the official number to 5. a tree trimmer hit a live power line, while work to clear branches in daltona and was electric cuted. >> biketoberfest the festival gathers over 100,000 people. >> daytona beach is still clearing up from the hurricane, but that doesn't stop hundreds of thousands of bikers. >> it's hard to believe hurricane matthew blew through but not even a hurricane could stop biketoberfest, local businesses telling us the crowd is bigger than ever. >> it's getting better, it's been great. a lot of our regulars have come here every single day to help us out. i think the hurricane really helped us, it rallied a lot of people to bring out the spirit of a lot of

and tom sullivan is a veteran who believes in an open and transparent government. there is no proof but as we been hearing from donald trump, the election is rigged the claims to raise questions about security and accuracy of your vote. tonight denver 7's mark stewart got access to the place the ballots are counted a process to see how secure the process is.>> a team from denver elections collect ballots from a dropbox. at the process that will take place from now until election day. the election workers wear buttons on their best to show their political affiliation the goal is to prevent any complex or conspiracy of a rigged election by having people from returns.>> all of our processes take place in a bipartisan fashion so you don't have any two members of one party working on any process or procedure.>> we asked alton diller -- dillard to give us a tour.>> security is tight. only approved staff members can access the processing center. that includes the area where ballots are sorted and verify.>> there is a network of cameras so every move inside can be reviewed

, neutrally transparent. >> it's late on a friday. fbi is shut down for the weekend. >> we don't know where comey is. he could be fishing. >> if comey stays silent, this thing seems to me to be a wildfire through monday. >> i cannot imagine -- comey's behavior has been hard to parse for months now but the pressure on him over in the coming hours to say something more i think is going to be intense. that was the only thing i could predict. >> incredible if he says nothing, incredible if he says something. we'll come back and tell you what we're doing sunday night right after this. hi my name itom. i'raph. my name is anne. i'm one ofhe real li torneys you can talk to through legalzoom. n't let unanswered legal questions ho you up, because we're re, we're he, d we've got your back., legalzoom. legal help is here. ...stop clic aroun..the lowestcs are alys ahilton.com... pay less and get more ly at hilton.com. >>> good evening, i'm krchris matthews in washington. we begin with the news what some are calling an october surprise. the fbi is

the video weaver ren seen come out afterwards raise more questions to the point of transparency. just give the public what you have so that we can see and make those decisions for ourselves. >> we're going to come back and come back with kay kelly jane torrence and kimberly atkins and we are asked the deeper question, where does it stem for? is it training? is it cold blue? and what needs to change. had recently we can't wait to hear it. >> the thing is that, you know, i don't want to tar all police officers with the same brush or anything, but there is a segment of human beings that when they get a little power, they want to, you know, show it off. once i was driving here in washington and somebody cut me off. i had to hit the brake, i almost hit them. i really just gave my horn. well, seconds later all of a sudden a siren goes off on this car that cut me mead over and it was police. they would not tell me what i've done. clearly he was just angry that, you know, i had been objected to the way he drove and i had no idea it was a police officer. this guy kept me sitting on a stre

-- you're the transparency coordinator. what do you believe congress should not be able to see? >> sir, thank you for the question. i am not completely familiar with all of the agreements and arrangements that we have. >> why should there be any agreements and arrangements? what could congress not see? you were brought in by secretary kerry, right, to be the transparency person, right? >> yes. >> you're a champion of transparency. what is it that congress should not be able to see? >> i think that congress should have access to all of the information that they are entitled to. i believe that there are certain restrictions that -- >> give me an example. you've been in foreign service for 33 years. give me an example of something that i as the chairman of the oversight committee, or mr. hice, should not be able to see? >> highly classified compartmented information perhaps, if you don't have the proper clearance. >> s.a.p. information? >> i assume so. unless you have the proper clearance. >> what else? >> information related

what transparency and accountability are the two pieces that you talked about.pecifically, what are the actions we can take your the board of supervisors the one >> sure. if you look at the recommendations of the report may start on page 159, been there done in categories. overall, i think the first major important step is having oversight. civilian independent oversight over what this police department does good by the way, oversight is not micromanaging a police department i was the independent police auditor for the city of san jose for five years. i wasn't interested for running a police department could pass on my expertise to what others interested in is ensuring what was done was being done in objective and proper fashion. san francisco we recommended for the police department and office of inspector general. that would have the function a civilian independent, independent not beholden to the chief, not beholden to anybody but reporting to you all in a public fashion on various aspects in the police department that you heard already the deficits the lack

the 2015-2016 civil grand jury report entitled "into the open: opportunities for more timely and transparent investigation into fatal san francisco police department officer-involved shootings." >> let me start by thanking the civil grand jury for their work and we previously heard this item in the middle of september. and had a couple of outstanding issues. one of them, being the status of the memorandum of understanding between the police officers' association and city and county of san francisco, and i see that chief mckeveren is here and the other was pending the release $1.8 million for the district attorney's unit and those have been released and ms. numan, what day did the budget and finance committee release those funds? >> september 28th, 2016. >> okay. i think our hearing was september 15th and it was supposed to be released by october 1st and indeed it was. with that, deputy chief. >> good morning, a appreciate the promotion, but i'm still a commander. [laughter ]. >> commander, sorry. >> thank you very much. good morning, supervisor breed and supervisor peskin. good to see you th

what transparency and accountability are the two pieces that you talked about.pecifically, what are the actions we can take your the board of supervisors the one >> sure. if you look at the recommendations of the report may start on page 159, been there done in categories. overall, i think the first major important step is having oversight. civilian independent oversight over what this police department does good by the way, oversight is not micromanaging a police department i was the independent police auditor for the city of san jose for five years. i wasn't interested for running a police department could pass on my expertise to what others interested in is ensuring what was done was being done in objective and proper fashion. san francisco we recommended for the police department and office of inspector general. that would have the function a civilian independent, independent not beholden to the chief, not beholden to anybody but reporting to you all in a public fashion on various aspects in the police department that you heard already the deficits the lack

and so he doesn't seem to be inclined towards transparency. i don't think we really know what it would look like. he hasn't spoken about foia from what we can tell on the campaign trail except to i guess criticize his opponent. >> in regard to a hypothetical trump presidency let me recall an episode from the 1960s. the supreme court case that upheld the fairness doctrine was, i think, i think the history shows that it was incity investigated or at least supported in part by the kennedy administration, a liberal democratic administration suing a radio station that broadcast john birch type material. so that's one thing a president could do, a president with hostage hostage -- hostility towards the press. i hope i'm not planting a suggestion in his mind. >> i don't think you need to plant one. donald trump has threatened or sued the media dozens of times over. >> and presumably he would be happy to financially bell lie-- finance libel litigation. >> that's right. you raise an interesting question and it's one i've wrestled with from a legal stan

milwaukee mayor tom barrett "that hasn't really happened regarding a transparent vote on this." the milwaukee county board says none of that is true.peggy west supervisor district 12 12"we've been nothing but transparent. we've never had board meeting"they believe tearing down the dam opens a floodgate of problems.john weishan district 16 16"we have a decades worth of public meetings and public votes and they want to say it wasn't transparent. i think that is the biggest insult the fact that they're really trying to cover up is they want to privatize and sell off your park " the county board has pointed out all of this documentation... plenty of possibility to hear other options.none of this can start until the rezoning is approved by the milwaukee common council. they call their movement "ban the box"...and milwaukee leaders gathered at city hall today to talk about it. it. alderwoman chantia lewis applicant about his or her criminal history. "ban the box" refers to application forms that require people to check a box if they have a criminal past.the city already has a 'policy'