>> treasan it's an ongoing program and we're working with dbi with the backflow preventers that need to be approved by dbi and we'll be working with dbi to process the applications. >> that gets to my second eligibility question, for backflow prevents, your guidelines say it has to be up to code. what are we protecting ourselvess or the property owner against there? >> we just simply, if the property owner is not currently up to code, and therefore, there would be costs associated with coming up to code, we do not want to bear those costs. and so, if the property owner is currently not up to code, we would assume beyond them bringing it to code first. in other words,, the reimbursability would be good for everything from code-forward, but the owner would be responsible for bringing their property up to code to that date. >> if you were up to code when you built your house, you are not longer up to code for a new structure. and if somebody is applying for a backflow preventer, are they basically subjecting themselves to bring their home up to all new current codes? >> i think we bette

>> treasan

>> treasan it's an ongoing program and we're working with dbi with the backflow preventers that need to be approved by dbi and we'll be working with dbi to process