she struggled to come out of the treen and open her eyes to what not happen. the feeling is something terrible is happening, a taste of nightmare remained. the year was 1929 and the time that the virginia and her family had no way of knowing she was joining millions of others suffering from a strange global pandemic, a disease that would change medicine itself but vanished from medical history. a disease that would kill close to a million people and leave thousands more languishing in mental institutions the rest of their lives, an epidemic that nearly a century later remains a mystery but could strike again. virginias mother spoke to her in the column tone of voice used for bloody chance or turned ingalls into her room was filled with voices of doctors what was most frightening was on the certainty in their voices. they didn't know what caused the city of the teenage girl and worse how to stop this and less sleep. her temperature was taken several times and noted on the chart. she felt the doctor's hand against her wrist and on the stem of artery along her ne

the truth is marijuana is a less harmful substance and there is no treen punish adults who choose toslp harmful substance. we're not going to lead to greater teen use. brian cites a 1979 figure and says we're down since then. but we're up since other years and it's been relatively constant that teen use is around 50% and we're not keeping teens from -- >> i want you to answer the comparison to alcohol because you hear that a lot. people far more damage seems to be done by people in our society by drinkers, people with alcohol other than this marijuana use. go ahead. >> it's true. alcohol does do a lot of harm to families. it does harm families. it's an acceptable activity for people to go out and have a few drinks. there is nothing wrong with that. if you go and move forward and start legalizing marijuana, cocaine, heroin, other drugs, i mean, where do you end? we need to draw the line somewhere and we as a society should not allow marijuana to be legal. >> brian, steve, i greatly appreciate it. i always wonder with these conversations like 15 years, 20 years from now if someone watc

i can remember in 20-- late 2002 before we introduced sen treen oh, i had this view that a new laptophout. wireless would not be very interesting. this was before wifi was popular. i made the decision to hold up our new chip for laptops until the wifi chip was ready and we created sen torino. >> rose: right, right. >> and the engineers thought i was nut. >> rose: this is a classic case. i know about this. >> but the market exploded. the laptop--. >> rose: so the nonengineer was right? >> it's not a nonengineer. it's listening to the markets, listening to where your customer-- what's the useage model. i like to think that everyone every c.e.o. of intel has brought a little bit of something to the stew. bob was this wonderful entrepreneur. gordon was. law. andy was actually--. >> rose: a great manager. >> he was a management guru. >> rose: when you came they said you were the product guy. >> and i was the product and marketing guy. >> rose: you understood what the consumers wanted. >> or we tried to. >> rose: or tried to. >> and i think that's helped us, and it's helped us move out of t

so when we hear congress people use that as a treen change from no to yes.ing on in the back ground, but i hope those that are no remain no, and it would abe victoryi victoryive. depending on what charge you're looking@at, we keep talking about the number 216 to pass or to fail, but you're saying you might be as many as five up. you think you're somewhere around 220 nos on this bill. we could be at 220 noes, yes. we could be. i think some of the people who have said how they're going to vote over the last 48 hours may want be there. i think we're hearing from our con stitch wens on an hourly basis. some of the congress people have been refusing to take calls from their constituent, and i think that's been a mistake. i think we're beginning to hear and see that this is a very, very serious bill and had this been a good bill, we would not -- you and i would not be having this conversation. if this was a good bill, if this was a bill that the president understood, or nancy pelosi understood and could explain to the american people, wieldn't be having this conve

they made the announcement over webcast of all places on treehugger.com treen gambled that produces products that touch 3 billion people per day is planning an announcement next week encouraging their brands to shrink their environmental footprint. a general mills factory of minnesota is recycling their serial for biofuel saving $500,000 fuel costs in the process. the appropriately named green giant is reducing pesticides and chemical water pollution with sustainable farming. these are companies we know and use. timberland, mikey, best buy, starbucks, and they are responding to the consumer demand. consumers want to know their products don't have hidden health and environmental costs. companies must respond to parents who refuse to buy baby bottles with bpa or that have dangerous chemicals into their drinking water. industry can try to ignore the epa but i know and they know they resist the forces of the green marketplace at their peril. it's time to put the rest economic growth and environmental protection are incompatible. it's time to finally dismiss this false choice. we need a new appro

one million people, 40 million leeters of strong -- clean drinking water, built more than 11,100 la treens, treated more than 55,000 people at red cross hospitals or mobile clinics and assisted more than 25,000 people who arrived in the united states following the earthquake. with an estimated 1.3 million haitians left homeless by the earthquake, the difficult and noble work the american national red cross has undertaken in haiti is an effort that each and every american can be proud of. however, the relief they bring to haiti is only one example in over 129 years of exemplary humanitarian service. this institution represents the best aspect of the american spirit to people all around the world. when a disaster strikes the sign of the red cross is a source of comfort and hope and a reminder of the generosity and the caring nature of the united states and its citizens. since 1943 every president of the united states has proclaimed march as red cross month and i urge my colleagues to continue this tradition and support h.res. 311. madam speaker, i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker