. >> olivia is a real trendsetter. the creams, the whites, the tape.t's fantastic for fall. >> if you need a little last minute idea, go glam and dress up as your favorite washington, dc victor. check out what olivia is wearing tonight on scandal on abc two. >> at number three, get ready to say ahhhh. welcoming a male and female cub october 4th. we have a link to how you can enter the contest on the list show.tv. now you're caught up and clued in to what's happening around baltimore. i'm nikki mayo. >>> this just in. ghosts don't help your home's resale value. >> hey, guys, i'm brian. this is matt and theresa has the day off. >> okay. so it's halloween and brian, you know i just had to check out a haunted house. but got one of those ones where people jump out and touch you and scare you. this is a legitimate house. >> this house has a bit of history to it. and the history haunts these walls. >> i don't think it's a good idea to put that information on the listing. >> we talked to marge peck who got dressed for the season. it's good for movies, but not

applause) now, folks, all this heat on twitter is because it's where all the hippest, happeningest trendsetters go to speak their minds. i'm talking, of course, about jesus christ. (laughter) you see, in an attempt to appeal to the young lings vatican cardinal and president of the pontifical council for culture gianfranco ravasi said "christ used tweetses with everyone else with phrases made up of 45 characters such as love one another." of course jesus tweeted luv 1anthr #yolf #omm. (cheers and applause) you see? you young people -- young folks, giovanni ribisi here is just saying that jesus is into the same cool things you are. he invented twitter because he spoke in short sentences just like eve was the first to play fruit ninja. (laughter) but remember, jesus never made any money so he and twitter have the exact same business model. (laughter) we'll be right back. (cheers and applause) >> stephen: (cheers and applause) welcome back, everybody, thanks so much! folks, you know the midterm elections are over a year away but candidates are already out there campaigning for jobs in a government

how did other fashion producers react to the early success of the trendsetters in designer jeans? to keep uphe momentum, money was poured into adveising. department stores placed jeans in high-traffic areas. atts heyday, the designer jean industry was spending 10% of sales on advertising and promotion it was really the first time that television had been used so powerfully and so much money spent on television in any kind of fashion category i know. from that viewpoint, it had to have a big impact on people's consciousness. were you spending more on advertising thanther companies in youfield? at that time, i did. we spent 50% on advertising then. we created that demand. by putting millions of dollars into advertising very earlyn in the designer jean phenomeno many entrepreneurial producers were taking a very great risk with their finances. theyidn't know ifhe consumer would like it as much as they entually did like it. if it hadn't been a success, that advertising money would have bankrupted many compaes. in 1965, jeans were bought on the order of one pair less than one pair per c

restriction that prohibits you from getting to attend in texas, won california one in nevada, the trendsetter and republican party because that doesn't line up with the corruption russia. nobody thinks they get into a candidate and texas, california and michigan or whatever that your actual sum up getting a quid pro quo from them. i think this will be a step forward spent i would say nobody thinks that. >> nobody really understands the supreme court. the congress thought it. for one example. there are certainly people who are in favor of campaign finance restrictions he believed it passionately that they believe a lot of things the majority of the supreme court does not. so it's a fair point but i cannot see the supreme court upholding this restriction, and they do think it changes in the direction incrementally of taking a harder look at the amounts of money that are these, that are individual campaign contributions restrictions. but i don't see it breaking down the wall and getting a constitutional ruling that says just like you can spend unlimited amounts of money, you can have contributed