the inverse saying we have to have no part of this bill because if you want to retain parts it of, trfs-- of it, there was a bill saying keep this in and keep that out. you're not. why? your guess is as good as mine, but it's a lot easier to just tear down than create as we learned when we did the handgun bill, but you really have an obligation. unless you believe there shouldn't be a health care system or we ought to go back to the system without any changes in the law which we had that nobody liked, it's not fair. so, in conclusion, one, this bill reduces the deficit. the repeal increases the deficit, and there's no money there to make up for those funds that the bill would bring in. not by cost cutting and by fees. second, there are lots of good things in the bill that probably my colleagues would support, but they just get rid of them with no replacement. nothing. nothing for the seniors. nothing for the 21-26-year-olds. nothing for the people treated poorly by their insurance companies. third, we want to work with you. there are some changes, but we can work together on them in the