that's the three part of our strategic triad. and if we were to reduce the numbers as dramatically low as this paper would indicate, it is very clear that the triad would be jeopardized. that is to say that not all elements of it would have the weaponry to be part of our strategic deterrent. moreover, these numbers would suggest that parts of this triad which can be used for conventional purposes, bombs can drop high explosive bombs. they don't just drop nuclear weapons. a missile -- we have a lot of cruise missiles that send high explosive warheads to their destination. it doesn't have to be a nuclear warhead. if you reduce the number of delivery systems down below a certain level, you not only impact our strategic nuclear deterrent, but also our conventional deterrent and conventional capability. now, this may be very add van taijus for russia. as i said, russia is headed to a low level anyway because of their economy. i believe it is a grave risk for the united states and our allies. these are the issues that will warrant the

there we have a triad of the most dangerous health effects in the world, and he's putting forward a national healthcare agenda. iovereating, smoking, drinking. glenn: i can't believe you didn't bring up the wise latino woman. my next story is about how they are changing immigration without going through congress. he is looking for social justice. he is looking -- these are all code words. >> he's angry. glenn: he is angry, and he's looking for somebody who is going to change things the way he wants them changed, the way he can balance the scales for everybody, not the normal procedures that our founders had intended, right? >> correct. listen, i think you're right. it is the psychological theory of here is somebody who harbors anger and resentment towards white people, and some distaste for them or us, and then you start hooking again, what fits, what doesn't fit? when you nominate someone for the supreme court who says "i can make better decisions as as wise latina woman than a white male," well, there you go again. how many of the facts need to fit a theory before we say, oh, we have a con

nuclear triad. the icbm's, the submarine-launched missiles and our bomber fleet. our ability to extend credible nuclear guarantees to our allies and, three, whether lower levels provide an incentive to other nuclear powers to build up their forces so that they can be a peer competitor with the united states and russia. so i will have more to say on this in the future, but suffice it to say that i have yet to hear a convincing strategic rationale that we would justify going this low. indeed, i believe the burden of proof would be on those who think it is necessary to reduce u.s. nuclear force levels that are but a fraction of what they used to be. my major concern, however, is language in the joint understanding which seems to suggest the two sides may establish limitations on u.s. missile defense and long-range conventional strategic strike capabilities. in other words, the agreement could well involve into -- evolve into a limitation, either part of the treatment or currently, to limit our national missile defense capabilities. that's a very dangerous and unwise

administration's strong support for the health care savings proposal in the triet committee -- in the triadittee helped reform discussion draft dated june 13. virtually all of those policies are consistent with those the board by the administration and are essential to our share -- shared goal of reforming health care in a fiscally responsible manner. adopting deficit neutral health reform that expands coverage is not enough because it would perpetuate a system in which best practices are than universal and costs are too high. i commend you for proposing delivery system reforms that will begin the process of transforming our health system so that quality is improved, cost growth is contained, and waste is reduced pierre kempe it goes on to say some other things. -- waste is reduced." because of disease and other things. and then he said, "i urge you to maintain these policies pierre kempe is a very positive letter. -- these policies." it is a very positive letter. >> [inaudible] >> yes, you're talking about med pac, i think. that is and then we are discussing with the administration and the