i think the triad has served us well. i think it continues to serve us well. i think that as we look to the future, there are attributes that are spread across the triad that continue to make sense for our national security. having said that, i am concerned about the costs, and so i think there are a couple of things that we need to keep in mind. we need to phase these programs appropriately. we need to make sure that we have matched the investment with the needs. we need to control costs. i think there are a number of programatic steps to take as we go forward. when i look at the ohio replacement program, i know that we are making decisions here today that will be with us for decades to come. the ohio replacement program as far as we can see into the future, we believe that we see the strategic need for and the strategic value of a submarine based part of our deterrent so moving forward with that, even though we've had to delay the program some, is going to be important. that's also important with our allies, the brits. i think it's important that we have a d

it is the survival piece of the triad, as you said, and the department has been pretty clear on that to us, in general. >> changing subjects from ballistic missile submarines to attack submarines with a constant theme, the virginia class within your budget, we're doing two a year, and i thank you gentlemen and your predecessors for working on that. it took many years. but we're slipping on one of the boats and that causes problems. it causes problems, i think, in the overall cost of the programs, and let me ask you, the secretary, or the cno whether you would concur that will add additional costs to the program over time, and then what steps you might take to mitigate, for example, if we could include an additional ship in the multi-contract allowing long-term purchases. that might be the most effective way to deal with that. either the cno -- >> there's an operational cost that i'll quickly allude to. there is snn years, the requirements of the global commanders, and we have a deficit in the '20s and '30s. this will exacerbate that by moving the boat from 14 to 18. that's regrettabl

of pivotal change has we proceed with the modernization of the nuclear weapons complex and nuclear triad and further imbred cyber defense and cyber attack and the core mission competencies of 21st century warfare. nuclear modernization i'm encouraged even with the unprecedented level of defense spending uncertainty, the department has maintained its commitment of modernizing the triad of nuclear delivery vehicles. unfortunately the same cannot be said for the national nuclear security administration and their proposal to abandon or delay key elements of their plan. modernization is universally recognized as essential to the future viability of the nuclear weapons complex and a modernization is universally recognized to the future viability of the nuclear weapons complex and a pre-requisite for future reductions. it's now been over a year since the treaty entered into force and we don't see any sign of the administration keeping those commitments. the core of the strategic command mission is deterrence, however as frequency, sophistication and intensity of cyber related incidents continue

>> erstwhile, i continue to support the need for a balanced triad. triad is serviced well.it continues to serve us well. i think that as we look to the future, there are attributes that are spread across the triad that continue to make sense for our national security. having said that, i am concerned about the cost, so i think there are a couple of things we need to keep in mind. we need to face these programs up late. we need to make sure that we match the investment with the needs. we need to control costs. there are a number of programmatic steps. when i look at the ohio replacement program, another we are making decisions here today that will be with us for decades to come. the ohio replacement program, as far as we can see, we believe that we see the strategic need for a submarine-based part of our deterrent or it moving forward with that, even though we have had to delay the program some, it is going to be important. it is also important with our allies. it is important that we have a dual capable long range bomber. he needs to be nuclear capable, but it just won't be

this, general kehler, this was the triad that we -- i think it's about 2004, 2005 showing the cliff. you're somewhat familiar with that. now, i'm wondering if -- if we

the triad ethanol plant and the hundreds of billions wasted on sin fuel. >> some things work out.e things don't. >> progressives say it is worth the risk. >> i like the idea of government taking my tax dollars and investing in the technologies of tomorrow. >> progressives also like government forcing private companies to do it. >> those fuel efficiency standards have forced detroit to innovate in ways that it might not have without them. dictatevernment didn't tick 35 miles per gallon we wouldn't get there? we need government to force it? >> i do think we need government to force it. >> we don't. while government spent billions x prize offered a $10 million prize for a car that gets 100 miles per gallon. >> the announcement sparks an immediate and powerful worldwide since. >> wresponse. >> some teams used gasoline, electricity, even compressed air. >> 130 teams around the world entered. it is proving what is possible. >> the design phase was first. cars had to pass a looks test. >> then came the safety and performance test. most teams were eliminated. >> oh, well, we had the range

the triad ethanol plant and the hundreds of billions wasted on sin fuel. >> some things work out.gs don't. >> progressives say it is worth the risk. >> i like the idea of government taking my tax dollars and investing in the technologies of tomorrow. >> progressives also like government forcing private companies to do it. >> those fuel efficiency standards have forced detroit to innovate in ways that it might not have without them. dictatevernment didn't tick 35 miles per gallon we wouldn't get there? we need government to force it? >> i do think we need government to force it. >> we don't. while government spent billions x prize offered a $10 million prize for a car that gets 100 miles per gallon. >> the announcement sparks an immediate and powerful worldwide since. >> wresponse. >> some teams used gasoline, electricity, even compressed air. >> 130 teams around the world entered. it is proving what is possible. >> the design phase was first. cars had to pass a looks test. >> then came the safety and performance test. most teams were eliminated. >> oh, well, we had the range and t

the triad ethanol plant and the hundreds of billions wasted on sin fuel. >> some things work out.things don't. >> progressives say it is worth the risk. >> i like the idea of government taking my tax dollars and investing in the technologies of tomorrow. >> progressives also like government forcing private companies to do it. >> those fuel efficiency standards have forced detroit to innovate in ways that it might not have without them. dictatevernment didn't tick 35 miles per gallon we wouldn't get there? we need government to force it? >> i do think we need government to force it. >> we don't. while government spent billions x prize offered a $10 million prize for a car that gets 100 miles per gallon. >> the announcement sparks an immediate and powerful worldwide since. >> wresponse. >> some teams used gasoline, electricity, even compressed air. >> 130 teams around the world entered. it is proving what is possible. >> the design phase was first. cars had to pass a looks test. >> then came the safety and performance test. most teams were eliminated. >> oh, well, we had the range a

the triad ethanol plant and the hundreds of billions wasted on sin fuel. >> some things work out.progressives say it is worth the risk. >> i like the idea of government taking my tax dollars and investing in the technologies of tomorrow. >> progressives also like government forcing private companies to do it. >> those fuel efficiency standards have forced detroit to innovate in ways that it might not have without them. dictatevernment didn't tick 35 miles per gallon we wouldn't get there? we need government to force it? >> i do think we need government to force it. >> we don't. while government spent billions x prize offered a $10 million prize for a car that gets 100 miles per gallon. >> the announcement sparks an immediate and powerful worldwide since. >> wresponse. >> some teams used gasoline, electricity, even compressed air. >> 130 teams around the world entered. it is proving what is possible. >> the design phase was first. cars had to pass a looks test. >> then came the safety and performance test. most teams were eliminated. >> oh, well, we had the range and the mileage bu

the triad ethanol plant and the hundreds of billions wasted on sin fuel. >> some things work out. don't. >> progressives say it is worth the risk. >> i like the idea of government taking my tax dollars and investing in the technologies of tomorrow. >> progressives also like government forcing private companies to do it. >> those fuel efficiency standards have forced detroit to innovate in ways that it might not have without them. dictatevernment didn't tick 35 miles per gallon we wouldn't get there? we need government to force it? >> i do think we need government to force it. >> we don't. while government spent billions x prize offered a $10 million prize for a car that gets 100 miles per gallon. >> the announcement sparks an immediate and powerful worldwide since. >> wresponse. >> some teams used gasoline, electricity, even compressed air. >> 130 teams around the world entered. it is proving what is possible. >> the design phase was first. cars had to pass a looks test. >> then came the safety and performance test. most teams were eliminated. >> oh, well, we had the range and the

the triad ethanol plant and the hundreds of billions wasted on sin fuel. >> some things work out.'t. >> progressives say it is worth the risk. >> i like the idea of government taking my tax dollars and investing in the technologies of tomorrow. >> progressives also like government forcing private companies to do it. >> those fuel efficiency standards have forced detroit to innovate in ways that it might not have without them. dictatevernment didn't tick 35 miles per gallon we wouldn't get there? we need government to force it? >> i do think we need government to force it. >> we don't. while government spent billions x prize offered a $10 million prize for a car that gets 100 miles per gallon. >> the announcement sparks an immediate and powerful worldwide since. >> wresponse. >> some teams used gasoline, electricity, even compressed air. >> 130 teams around the world entered. it is proving what is possible. >> the design phase was first. cars had to pass a looks test. >> then came the safety and performance test. most teams were eliminated. >> oh, well, we had the range and the mil

it is about 34 minutes triad >> let's talk to >>gary: gary >> darya >>darya: i wanted to talk about thewin. -- six-one play. i love right there were he sweeps an up with the glove and the clear hand rolling. gary that is always been the thing with the giants. they have led gray defense. >>darya: said that the less >>gary: to oakland a's season with the hit in the game is great. did you hear anyone say, glow is too heavy lately? only because i did this for a living, he looks about the same as he did last year. >>darya: when i look to the pitches, hundred and eight pitches and five innings. >>gary: the cities you get to 100 the people start looking. and the old days they used to let the pitcher throw hundred and 30 and hundred and 40. but today they do not want them to get hurt. they pull you more times than not. >>darya: i am a little league mom and they count. they will not let our little guys throw more than 30 pitches. >>gary: is your stomach turn up in knots when your son is that back? . diane has >>darya: a employed to pay him every time he does good. >>gary: >>darya: i wish is stil

we triad grand bargain but he upped the ante.-- playing off the statistic that 56 percent think we are, the country, is off on the wrong track. what the republics and romney are trying to do, not define the race on their terms with a vision for the future but to say it is all obama's fault. >> this is the first time i have seen the republican leadership mount an attack on the president that was anywhere in the ballpark which is he's not leading. we were willing to compromise. rather than whatever they have been doing they went right at the achilles' heel. he is not a real leader that is why it sounds effective. he has been attacking the republicans with such end vehemence this is reciprocal. >> 38 straight months of unemployment above 8 percent and he added $5 trillion to the debt, gas prices have doubles and the keystone xl pipeline is haunting him, now, and home sales are down, and housing in a free fall that is tough to run on. >> so why shouldn't we republicans be able to win? we should be able to beat that guy. >>greg: you s

. >> well, i think it's critically important because it was part of the nuclear triad at the time. and a long reach and it can basically for conventional nuclear weapons, it's got a variety of precision strikes and those kind of thing. >> right. >> how many people fit in that aircraft and how long-- i've often heard how long the things can travel, too, the amount of fuel can go for a long time. >> right. and as far as the cockpit, it's ten people max. in the old day, we used to have a gunner on board and the gunner is no longer on the airport, but the thing can fly unrefueled -- i mean, with refueling the airplane can fly basically around the world. >> how important was it. you've got a long legacy, with it a no-brainer for you to fly in the air force? >> something i wanted to do, want today see my dad coming home in a flight suit and go to my grandparents for christmas and talk to my grandfather, i would be a pilot flying. so i knew from a young age as far as back as i remembered that i wanted to be a pilot and just, didn't really know what plane i was wanting to fly, but knew i w