she was also asked about the so—called trojan horse scandal.muslims was taking control of some schools in birmingham. i'm just wondering, in terms of the trojan horse scandal, whether or not he think that's a tip of the iceberg or a one—off? in terms of... we are very honest in their review about this, which is in terms of some of the things that we are seeing during what's called the trojan horse, we didn't have to find it very difficult to find things like segregation of girls, some of the sort of what i would describe as anti—equal opportunities or antiliberal values. i again think that, that there's too much... because there are court cases and various things going on, i don't want to go into too much detail over the actual trojan horse. but is it happening elsewhere? but, yes, it's happening elsewhere. one idea in the casey review was for immigrants to swear an integration oath. dame louise said symbolic acts could have a powerful impact. the rights and wrongs of immigration are for other people to judge but what is clear is that we ought

in my view this is a trojan horse of tax cuts for the wealthy and the most fortunate. when you look at both sides of the ledger, you see how unfair this scheme actually is. on the website of tens of millions was insurance and suffer economic pain. on the other side, those at the top of the income scale one of the questions i've asked nearly every day in the paul's by many in the press and elsewhere whether democrats are going to take part in this effort and what ideas democrats would put forward. so off describe why that question is so off the mark. you have to look beyond the process itself. budget reconciliation is in inherently it's not a process that brings people together. it's a process that drives people apart. it is inherently partisan. a difficult proposal that comes to the senate floor subject on limited debate and amendments. usually it takes 60 senators on both parties to come together and passed legislation. it is very rare a party builder that super majority on its own. so the two sides have to work together. that is the senate at its best. i see my frien

lose our environmental protections, our food standards, our food assurances, and this will be a trojan horse. britain can of course offer trump something back in some areas. if the donald accuses many nato allies of being freeloaders, that's not so different to long—held a downing street views. instead of planning expensive new headquarters or dreaming of a european army, what europe needs to do now is to spend more on its own defence. that is the best possible approach to the trump presidency. but on so many questions, from policy towards israel to torture, putin or withdrawal of funding from the un, britain is on a quite different page. how to break the news to trump gently? this is not going to be easy for her. she's got to steer between not behaving like a british poodle to the american president, but at the same time, creating a atmosphere in which, as she said herself, you can invest new meaning in the special relationship. these days, and we saw this during the last visit here by the chinese president, diplomacy as demanded by many on twitter or even from the floor of the house of com

in my view this is a trojan horse of tax cuts for the wealthy and the most fortunate. when you look at both sides of the ledger, you see how exceptionally unfair this scheme actually is. on one side tens of millions of americans lose insurance and suffer economic pain. that's the typical family. on the other side, substantial tax breaks for those at the top of the income scale. one of the questions i've asked nearly every day in these halls, and i'm asked this by many, many in the press and elsewhere is whether democrats are going to take part in this effort and what ideas democrat would put forward. and i want to take just a minute to describe why that question is so off the mark. first you have to look at the nature of the reconciliation process itself. budget reconciliation is inherently a partisan exercise, inteerntsly it's not -- inherently it's not a process that brings people together. it's a process that drives people apart. it's inherently partisan. a typical proposal that comes to the senate floor subject to unlimited debate and unlated amendment. usually it

in my view this is a trojan horse of tax cuts for the wealthy and the most fortunate. when you look at both sides of the ledger, you see how exceptionally unfair this scheme actually is. on one side tens of millions of americans lose insurance and suffer economic pain. that's the typical family. on the other side, substantial tax breaks for those at the top of the income scale. one of the questions i've asked nearly every day in these halls, and i'm asked this by many, many in the press and elsewhere is whether democrats are going to take part in this effort and what ideas democrat would put forward. and i want to take just a minute to describe why that question is so off the mark. first you have to look at the nature of the reconciliation process itself. budget reconciliation is inherently a partisan exercise, inteerntsly it's not -- inherently it's not a process that brings people together. it's a process that drives people apart. it's inherently partisan. a typical proposal that comes to the senate floor subject to unlimited debate and unlated amendment. usually it

in some ways the comments thing was a trojan horse to ask before we end here about this part of it. you really are now, truly, a public figure. you are not just an invisible name or an invisible face behind a microphone, but the way journalism and news production and all that has changed, the expectation is that you're gonna interact with your audience, whether it's through comments or anything else. are you good with that? - as long as it's in the right context. again, i think it goes back to what we were talking about earlier, about how much of you should be out there in the world. do i really need to be telling everybody what i had for lunch? maybe some journalists want to do that, you know, posting every picture of every meal. that's fine. i guess i'm always asking myself, "how much of my opinions, how much of my story, how much of that needs to be out there?" because, how much will it affect the perception of the work that i'm doing? that i am transparent, and that i am fair, and that i'm truthful. - you want the focus on your work. - yeah. - interestingly enough, your colleagu

at the refugee act is nothing but a trojan horse. we've seen it over and over again. innocent americans are being killed and hurt. our ally also in western europe say the same thing. it tens of thousands of illegal, criminal aliens are being released upon the streets to roam at will, and their native countries will not repatriate them. these bills, one will cause the program until we can let them properly. the second one with put some teeth to take away their visa programs for the countries who refused to repatriate their criminal citizens, and also cut off their foreign aid. it's a no-brainer. it needs to be passed. >> lou: a couple of powerful texans with you. brady. what does he say? did you find some help there? even the speaker? come on. >> brian: lou, we have it a change in the political scene appear since the election of donald j. trump. he has been talking about these fothe last six months, the last year as he was running. i'm telling you, how we introduced these bills. tonight, if they don't get into law in some form of fashion, i will be very greatly surpris

the trojan horse in your house part in which it will be the nerve center of your home.i technology as you are alluding to his facebook, it should live on your phone or your watch. there's no reason that the command or responsiveness should live on a tower device inside your house. you will have a device inside your house that will become the nerve center. on the other hand, the ai will live in your phone. there are privacy concerns because there are our cases emerging that might go to the supreme court asking whether cops should be able to listen in on it these devices and whether the recordings they make should be housed in the cloud or automatically deleted. very responsible companies doing it but the edges always receding. we were talking about facebook and one of the areas they made forays in the was virtual reality. the are become dominant? michael: i'm not hearing a lot about it. there's -- is it because the headset is still attached by a wire to the wall? the experience is not quite where you wanted to be. being ables idea of to live in a virtual world and being

one of these devices -- >> open up a trojan horse into the invasion of your privacy mierks colleagues here among them. >> hacking. >> we have to give a shout out to our company, comcast. x1 system, that's voice activated. apple tv. >> but it doesn't order paper towels also. >> ooh. >> or turn on your -- >> i disconnected mine. i had this stuff and took it out because i didn't see a benefit and ended up integrating with the xfinity system. i'm not saying that because i'm a comcast employee. >> my 3-year-old is now running around the house yelling commands to alexa. if that's the way they're trained to grow up, be careful. >> be careful. >> good point. >>> jason, ed, mark, thank you very much. i don't know who ed is. it's getting ugly over here. >> alex's brother. >> eddie, order me some cigars and lighter fluid. we're going up in smoke! >>> democrats are coming out firing over the future of health care. the latest and why if you own hospital stocks you might want to pay close attention. eddie, keep on "power lunch." we're back in two. you do all this research on a perfect car, then sma

which is really trojan horse for buying stuff a lot and maybe overvalued.e're in the opposite situation now. the u.s. market has done really well. a lot of other markets haven't done really well and they look kind of cheap. i think investors should think about diversifying, using this weakness, relative weakness in foreign markets to diversify away from the u.s. market. i'm not bearish on u.s. market. in fact i think it is going to new highs but i think it is a good time to diversify. liz: if we start to look a little rich at this point, we head into the inauguration, markets sell off into inauguration. >> there is pattern pretty predictable, after an election you see enthusiasm, good sentiment, somewhere around now, period before the inauguration or mod prattly later, maybe week or two later you do tend to see a top. liz: what is the investment warning you feel compelled to give people right now who are listening? >> i don't really have much of a warning other than, really on the stock market. i have advice that the rally that is now happening in the bond

cabinet, a strong labour authority, where we know there has been issues before, there has been trojan horseis not taking these things seriously, we need to have zero tolerance on this kind of behaviour. birmingham council told newsnight school governing bodies decide on uniform but that it is working with saint clare's to make sure its policy is in line with legal requirements as well as talking to all schools in the area to ensure they know their responsibilities. the posts on facebook by the councillor who sparked this row have apparently now been removed. donald trump news now. it's coming thick and fast. mark urban, our diplomatic editor has been in the us but is here now. and today... a change of tack on the keystone pipeline. you had better explain. it is a pipeline running from canadian oil fields, or is meant to, into the american system, stopped by president obama in 2015 and donald trump this morning made an executive order to try to get it going and the dakota access pipeline under construction stopped by lawsuits. the aim is to announce big and bold, we put american jobs, americ

it is a trojan horse. disguised as depth of production plans, it is really an attempt to impose a radical vision on our country. thinly veiled social darwinism. will you except the support of clan organizers before you are president, the support after your president? >> sean: mr. bring us all together, clan synthesizers. while running for president in '07 and '08, he blamed president bush for all of the problems. once he got into office, he did the same thing for eight straight years. here are just a few examples. >> we are inheriting so many challenges, we knew this was going to take time. because we got this big, messy, tough democracy. previous administrations, previous congress brought an expensive new drug program, past massive tax cuts for the wealth wealthy. if we had taken office during ordinary times, we should've started bringing down these deficits immediately. these are far from the best of times. by any measure, my administrations and parroted of fiscal disaster. >> sean: the bush blame game b

they did not come here as trojan horses. >> the san bernardino couple. that is another case where the wife was using immigration system to get here. does the u.s. have the big problem that the president seems to think it does? >> not according to his critics. there is frustration that not only would this move not fix the problem, it would, in fact, cause more anger. something that donald trump does not think is possible. one thing i saw fascinating is that one of the demographics who got behind donald trump most, white he vevangelicals. to see their response to this is fascinating for two reasons. one, the president promised he would do this. it is not a surprise to many people. two, there were many people who got on the trump train because they thought a lot of these promises were just talk. to your point, he proven that he is a man of action. whether or not he will move congress and other agencies is not yet clear. as of now, he is trying. >> he is trying. he signed a number of actions and directives to push the country along the path he promised. cong

just like the iraq refugee program, we're seeing that terrorists have found a way to make this a trojan horse to get into the united states. and that's what we're trying to stop by doing this. >> but on the issue of extreme vetting which sounds very important, how do you do that specifically? >> it's a great question. in the memo we outlined some specific ways to ramp up the vetting process, ask more specific questions, look at social media. but that's also in term of what that means will be a determination that general kelly is now going to be required by this executive order to make in the next 30 days. >> as you know, refugee officials here in the united states say already it takes at least a year or two for a refugee to be admitted into the united states. >> yeah, i would argue there are a lot of technologies, wolf, out there that i have been presented to me that can actually detect whether someone is lying about having terrorist ties that we're not implementing. right now i think we should be looking at that kind of stuff that could really better protect america. and then be able to dete

. >> the trojan horse in the unassuming u-haul. it knocks over a hefty a.t.m. the trio shout orders lifting and shoving the money machine in the u-haul. within minutes the truck peels out. cargo door is still ajar. >> this is the first time it has happened to me. it was >> the gas station owner says the a.t.m. was bolted in the concrete. likely had a few grand inside. >> i call 911. kevin: the overnight clerk hiding in the cash booth felt the ground shake. last month alone the thieves tried to steal six a.t.m.'s from businesses. on monday, d.c. police found this abandoned u-haul in a southeast a.m. with a.t.m.'s and -- southeast alley and a.t.m.'s and a safe in the cargo hold. they won't say if it's connect told this case but it has the same sack -- sack -- sacawajea image on the side. there is no rental contract to track them down. this happened between 2:00 and 5:00 a.m. maureen: we begin with the continued breaking news from fort lauderdale, florida, where the airport is still shut down after a deadly shooting. jonathan: we can tell you five people are dead

a big part of this debate really seems to be about creating a trojan horse to give tax cuts to some of the most fortunate while infect raising health care costs for millions of others and breaking the medicare promise which is what my colleagues are seeking to protect in their amendment number 20. madam president, mr. president, we're going to be talking more about this. certainly as the senior democrat on the senate finance committee, we'll be having significant debates about these issues in the committee, but i'm very appreciative that senator donnelly and senator hirono have allowed us to jumpstart what this debate is really all about and that is keeping the promise of medicare, keeping the promise of guaranteed benefits, working in a bipartisan way to update the guarantee to deal with chronic illness and improve options for home care. i commend them both for their good work and i yield the floor. mr. president, i note the absence of a quorum. the presiding officer: the clerk will cal th -- will call e roll. quorum call: quorum call: the presiding officer: the senator from kentucky.

there is the fear here and you know this, that we're letting in people who he called it the trojan horse during the campaign. can you speak to that? because there are people who are frankly a little afraid about that. so they're not fighting this. >> this is how donald trump views all of immigrants. it was always in the context of rapists and murderers and drug dealers from mexico for example. that's how he views immigration. and when it comes to people coming as refugees even though that is part of the historical tradition of this country, he views refugees as all potential terrorists. and that is a very dark view obviously of the rest of the world. it doesn't comprehend the fact that this country was built by immigrants, that people who come here enrich the country, that frankly the hundreds of thousands of people that have come as refugees since 9/11 have been helping to build this country. we've had very few problems with any of them. so as an attitude of fear and unfortunately, we now have a president who plays upon those fears. we had a president who just left office who drew on pe

in people from places like syria where we know for a fact there are people coming in like in a trojan horseosing as refugees who are going to try to come and do us harm. that we have to stop for a moment on places where we could really be facing harm and assess what's going on there, which actually isn't that much different from what we heard at these congressional hearings when it was said, well, no, we're not going to ban people based solely on a religion. but we may pursue a line of questioning based on, you know, four people who are muslim and say, well, you're muslim, do you want to come here to kill people? i don't know who it is, honestly. but that's where the questioning went. since they're clarifying to a logical point what trump did kind of say when he clarified down the road. no? >> yeah. and i think there's a lot of stuff he puts out there, and he definitely doesn't like to -- the devil's in the details, and he doesn't really focus on that. i think he's a delegator. so i think that they're clarifying a little bit more where he stands on that. but at the same time, i think it's i

instead of actually moving us forward and uniting us, this is a trojan horse, poppy, just like the wallromote an extremist ideology, dividing americans along religious and ethnic lines. now, about keeping us safe, it's both ineffective and counterproductive. why is it ineffective? because it's called the measure to protect americans from terrorist attack by foreign nationals. kato institute, a conservative institute, did a study. in the past 40 years, poppy, do you know how many foreign national from these seven muslim majority national countries have killed americans in terrorist attacks in america? zero. state department has resettled 785,000 people, refugees, since 9/11 -- >> none of them from iraq has killed an american? that's an interesting statistic. no one from iraq has killed an american? >> no foreign national on american soil. >> you said no from these seven -- >> no terrorist attacks, they have not been killed in terrorist attacks on american soil. >> i just don't see why you're -- >> also, 785 -- congressman -- >> it's a failed policy that we've inherited with, and he is tr

created in the european union a belief, not wholly unfounded perhaps that she is being used as a trojan horsefuture, she has damaged her bargaining power with europe and we will be less able to get the good deal she says she needs from the european union and at the same timel from the european union and at the same time i have to say, dangling buckingham palace in front of him has only brought us into a position where when he comes here, they will be the biggest public demonstration that has been seen, whether it embarrasses her majesty, we don't know and shouldn't ask, she will do her duty, but it is likely to end up with him being embarrassed. what is britain gaining from this? we have made ourselves look rather stupid abroad and we generate add situation from which nobody will emerge unembarrassed. number ten say what this is about is trying to cement in place a long—term strategic relationship with america, our key ally, that's what it's about? there was a better way of doing it, by perhaps leaving it longer before she went. here is the inevitable outcome. i know this because i was speaki

bottom line, the aca repeal scheme that was kicked off last week is a trojan horse of tax breaks for the most fortunate. it is paid for by taking tax benefits for health insurance away from millions of working people. then it is back for round two. under an emerging republican plan to fast-track an even bigger tax break for the wealthy. in my view, this is proof that the campaign promises of fixing the tax system were pretty much a head fake. the president-elect said he would close the carried interest loophole. it is a favorite of investment fund managers. but his plan actually gives them a 25% tax cut. n fact, it slashes tax rates for corporations and the wealthy across the board at a cost of trillions of dollars. sounds to me like the mnuchin rule is already on the ropes. now, what with the new administration's tax plan do for people of more modest income. millions of working parents, mostly single, would get hit with tax increases because they lose head of household status hen they file. in my view, senators need to -- if you want to push folks out of the economic winners circle,

your biggest critics will be republican governors and would be more diplomatic to see this as a trojan horse to cut spending that is why allied of us are concerned about the safety net. so with then all across the country will use choice providers in dues said fact it how leaflet with this pharmaceutical pieces for you did not the answer the question faugh of the republican vince could howff foot that is what concerns me about all of this fall on the ethics questions. to correct for one key point said earlier the congressmen does not have control over the of brokerage account that doesn't clarify the of level of control and told senator murray's quotation i did that prayer a broker for. but the third on the point that this is not a blind trust let the record reflect that also to put this in the record on investments specifically for companies that manufacturer urfa products. >> without objection. >> one last point. ever since i was director for almost seven years to be interested n1 thing five a system for largely from the health the end the of wealthy i had eight democrats and eight republi

republican governors and there will be probably more diplomatic than me, are going to see this as a trojan horse to cut spending. and that's why a lot of us are concerned about shredding the safety net. i asked you about women's health care and here the concern is women all across the country are concerned that they're going to lose a choice of providers if they want, they have today, and coverage and you just said hey, i disagree with the congressional budget office. i asked about drugs and how we're going to lower the pharmaceutical prices. and you told me about pharmaceutical benefit managers, you told me about part d, i voted for part d. one of the relatively few democrats who did. but you didn't answer the question about whether you would get republicans to help you fulfill the president's pledge on bargaining. so that's what concerns me about all of this, on the ethics questions, we want to correct one key point, was said earlier in the hearing, that the congressman doesn't have control over his brokered accounts. first, the congressman has not provided copies of the agreements that would