. >> it was very troublingng. the criteria that was u used was very backward-looking and therere was s very littlee consideration to the revenues, profits and margins and what w in front of us. the ctrac had counterparties that were federal government-related or d.c. government-related. that was completely left aside more so checking boxoxes methodology. >> as you all pointedut in the story, you had no lawsuits or in any major debt hanging over you. it looked like a good proposition. you u had this contract on the table. you got a small loaoan but at a higher rate. >> it was the size of t loan sutantlly smaller than what we really need to fulfill the contract so we had to sisize dow our opopportunity d we left lot of money on the table. we were able to secure som financing. it i expensive capital. e ultimately did not use the relalationship. i can see how a a lot of businesses would go out of business without that financing but at the same time e as oth avenues availilablei would not know what an appropriate strat