how do you feel about the idea of ​​creating such a tsc?mocratic parliamentary control, which is effective enough in developed democracies. i don't i can say that the democratic parliamentary control in ukraine is quite effective and in this context the creation of the tsc where there is a monomajority where in principle the institution mechanism of, say, the tsc was somewhat discredited when they were formed exclusively from representatives of one faction, from a formal point of view - this is absolutely correct, absolutely logical, if it was still in peacetime, it would be directly supported today, from my point of view, the most effective would be the creation of a corresponding board from representatives of the countries that provide us with weapons under the ministry of defense or under to the general staff in order to be able to carefully monitor and track the use of our provision of high-precision weapons to us, and after their use by our armed forces, supplies increase , and this is actually a very good signal that nothing is used,

, deputy of the voice, uh, such a tool as the tsc in the parliament, to what extent will it be effective control, what will happen from this commission? i am sure that this is more advisory, such a story will be more about public, more about contacts with the mass media and the public, because now, i know exactly what the ministry of defense of ukraine there, the general staff is not actively in contact with our friends from the west , the us constantly reports on the use of certain weapons, not certain, but all the weapons that come to ukraine, to which areas it goes, how it is distributed, the ways of its transfer the movement of the measures of the conspiracy, the measures of the conspiracy report to you the lost equipment here were the reports what are these howitzers, some of them were damaged somewhere captured by the russians, all processes are reported, including the prohaimas, and they are still there with gps sensors, that is, the americans themselves can see where this or that piece of equipment is now conditionally online, where it is moving according to the agreed directions

you've been very active in an organization that fights against school choice in arizonaa tsc. se you chosen an area of the laws that really requires you to wear jersey to clearly do havear a liberal world view, liberal world view. >> that's an understatement atvi first, reported by fox digital, deci serves on the board ofs just o communities arizona. g it's a group whose mission is to create a world free of prisons and punishment. >> so how do you seriously t consider having someonehe on the bench who doesn't seem to believe in our criminalve justice system? that's wild even for the 9th circuit. she also works as an attorney for planned parenthood and helped launch the state's la marijuana program. she's a real gem here now as mike davis said, a free project . nsrmer chief counsel for nominationsel to the senate judiciary committee. mike , great to see you in studio. why is this nomination tot the court of appeals so bad and how why does it have to be stopped? this one is particularly bad out of all the nominees.s. she's right up there with one of the worst. she's worked with