xh is appeal number 1 3-051nga tu lam, appellant(s) vs. dept. of public health, respondent.appealing the sixty (60) day suspension on april 15, 2013, of massage practitioner permit. director's case no. msg-13-19. >> and we can start with the apell lant. >> my name is christopher hall and appealing with the appellant. and this is as you so rightly pointed out it is an appeal pertaining to a $500 fine, within 60 days of suspension and then, it is our position that the appellant's position first of all that dr. aragon the director who issued the decision which is dated april the 15th, 2013, that is attached to the notice of appeal as the exhibit a. and i want to point out that that decision that he rendered is a date there which is paragraph three. and it mentions that, he violated 647 via the penal code in 2013 and his decision is inconsistent and that date, july the 12th, it is inconsistent with the notice of citation that was issued to miss lamb. way back on july the 27th. she was not working on july the 12th, 2012, so if you look closely at tha